Decisions, Volume 4 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... counsel urged that the basic facts necessary to prove complainant's case before the examiner were before the New York court , and that on the principle of res judicata the final determination of the court favorable to complainant was ...
... counsel urged that the basic facts necessary to prove complainant's case before the examiner were before the New York court , and that on the principle of res judicata the final determination of the court favorable to complainant was ...
Page 10
... counsel for the above parties and counsel for the Board were heard . It is contended , especially by PTL , and it has been found by the examiner , that PFEL does not have the status of an existing operator During 1950 and 1951 the ...
... counsel for the above parties and counsel for the Board were heard . It is contended , especially by PTL , and it has been found by the examiner , that PFEL does not have the status of an existing operator During 1950 and 1951 the ...
Page 26
... Counsel for the Board has stipulated that he will not file exceptions to either the initial or supplemental recommended decisions of the examiner . The record is convincing that the service under consideration is in the public interest ...
... Counsel for the Board has stipulated that he will not file exceptions to either the initial or supplemental recommended decisions of the examiner . The record is convincing that the service under consideration is in the public interest ...
Page 31
... counsel appearing before the Board , both at San Francisco and Washington , argued that section 4 of the Administra- tive Procedure Act is incorrectly cited in the Board's notice as an enabling statutory provision for the proposed rule ...
... counsel appearing before the Board , both at San Francisco and Washington , argued that section 4 of the Administra- tive Procedure Act is incorrectly cited in the Board's notice as an enabling statutory provision for the proposed rule ...
Page 36
... counsel for the Board . We heard oral argument on the examiner's recommended decision in its entirety on May 28 , 1952 , at which counsel for applicant , Waterman , and the Board appeared and were heard . It is conceded by all parties ...
... counsel for the Board . We heard oral argument on the examiner's recommended decision in its entirety on May 28 , 1952 , at which counsel for applicant , Waterman , and the Board appeared and were heard . It is conceded by all parties ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
A. J. WILLIAMS additional Alaska amended American Export Lines American President Lines APL's application approval Atlantic ports charges charter Coastwise combination vessels commodities common carrier competitors complainant cost determine differential dual-rate system effect estimate evidence examiner examiner's Export Fabre FEDERAL MARITIME BOARD filed flag foreign commerce foreign-flag competition foreign-flag vessels freighters Grace Line granted Gulf hearing hereinafter inbound intercoastal Isbrandtsen Isbrandtsen Company issues January Johnson Line liner long tons Lykes Maritime Administrator Maritime Commission ment Merchant Marine Act Mississippi Netherlands nonconference North Atlantic operating-differential subsidy outbound passenger percent period PFEL Philippines proceeding proposed Public Counsel purposes and policy reasonable rebates recommended decision record respondent rule sailings section 605 shipments shippers Shipping Act Steamship Company subsidy agreement subsidy contract substantial tariff testified tion tons Trade Route traffic transportation undue unfair unjustly discriminatory voyage Waterman York
Popular passages
Page 691 - ... fixing or regulating transportation rates or fares ; giving or receiving special rates, accommodations, or other special privileges or advantages; controlling, regulating, preventing, or destroying competition...
Page 31 - ... recommend a decision, except that in rule making or determining applications for initial licenses — (1...
Page 856 - States shall have a merchant marine (a) sufficient to carry its domestic water-borne commerce and a substantial portion of the water-borne export and import foreign commerce of the United States and to provide shipping service on all routes essential for maintaining the flow of such domestic and foreign water-borne commerce at all times...
Page 725 - ... like and contemporaneous service in the transportation of a like kind of traffic under substantially similar circumstances and conditions, such common carrier shall be deemed guilty of unjust discrimination, which is hereby prohibited and declared to be unlawful.
Page 725 - That nothing in this act shall prevent the carriage, storage, or handling of property free or at reduced rates for the United States, State, or municipal governments...
Page 541 - ... no such company shall make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to or in favour of any particular person or company, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 538 - Every such carrier and every other person subject to this Act shall establish, observe, and enforce just and reasonable regulations and practices relating to or connected with the receiving, handling, storing, or delivering of property.
Page 346 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 95 - States and to provide shipping service on all routes essential for maintaining the flow of such domestic and foreign waterborne commerce at all times, (b) capable of serving as a naval and military auxiliary in time of war or national emergency...
Page 695 - ... allotting ports or restricting or otherwise regulating the number and character of sailings between ports; limiting or regulating in any way the volume or character of freight or passenger traffic to be carried; or in any manner providing for an exclusive, preferential, or co-operative working arrangement. The term "agreement" in this section includes understandings, conferences, and other arrangements.