Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 54
Page 103
... ( Table 6.0 ) . Four candidates should have been activated following the model but were not . They were all people of very high reputations , national leaders in their fields . One possible reason for not activating them may be a learning ...
... ( Table 6.0 ) . Four candidates should have been activated following the model but were not . They were all people of very high reputations , national leaders in their fields . One possible reason for not activating them may be a learning ...
Page 122
... ( Table 6.6 ) . This lack of interest apparently was partly connected to the view that none of these three candidates was good enough to be accepted . Some also gave as their reason for not meeting the candidates that it was impossible to ...
... ( Table 6.6 ) . This lack of interest apparently was partly connected to the view that none of these three candidates was good enough to be accepted . Some also gave as their reason for not meeting the candidates that it was impossible to ...
Page 390
... Table 17.0 . Table 17.1 shows the intercorrelations ( gamma ) among the 14 variables involved in the study across all respondents . Correlations that are not significant at the .05 level are shown in parentheses.3 Inspection of this table ...
... Table 17.0 . Table 17.1 shows the intercorrelations ( gamma ) among the 14 variables involved in the study across all respondents . Correlations that are not significant at the .05 level are shown in parentheses.3 Inspection of this table ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote