Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 70
Page 24
... assume that criteria of relevance are clear . What issues and solutions are associated with what decisions , and what people participate in what decisions are assumed to be relatively unproblematic . In the case of bureaucratic ...
... assume that criteria of relevance are clear . What issues and solutions are associated with what decisions , and what people participate in what decisions are assumed to be relatively unproblematic . In the case of bureaucratic ...
Page 210
... assume that those areas of the country having the greatest power will receive the greatest rewards from the political system . In particular , we assume that colleges will be distributed to the " powerful " . We consider five ...
... assume that those areas of the country having the greatest power will receive the greatest rewards from the political system . In particular , we assume that colleges will be distributed to the " powerful " . We consider five ...
Page 287
... assume that all leaders have the same amount of power , that all non - leaders have the same amount of power , and that the number of leaders and non - leaders is stable over time . Assuming no discounting of future returns , a non ...
... assume that all leaders have the same amount of power , that all non - leaders have the same amount of power , and that the number of leaders and non - leaders is stable over time . Assuming no discounting of future returns , a non ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote