Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 163
... discussion , no agreement on whether to discuss goals or structure 3 ) group discussion . The groups can decide themselves what to discuss 4 ) School board demands final decision on their proposal . Many objections . The school board ...
... discussion , no agreement on whether to discuss goals or structure 3 ) group discussion . The groups can decide themselves what to discuss 4 ) School board demands final decision on their proposal . Many objections . The school board ...
Page 172
... discussion was also the chairman of a committee , the task of which was to provide more space for the school . The architect , projected a building which consisted of only one big room , not very suitable for a workshop structure . This ...
... discussion was also the chairman of a committee , the task of which was to provide more space for the school . The architect , projected a building which consisted of only one big room , not very suitable for a workshop structure . This ...
Page 377
... discussion of the educational structure or on a discussion of long - run objectives ? For the most part , the teachers preferred to have the locus of discussion be the problem of goals , while the bulk of the third - grade parents ...
... discussion of the educational structure or on a discussion of long - run objectives ? For the most part , the teachers preferred to have the locus of discussion be the problem of goals , while the bulk of the third - grade parents ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote