Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 123
... faculty ( Table 6.8 ) . Asking the faculty members whom they had been talking to about the deanship , we use ( a ) how people report their own activity , and ( b ) what each faculty member's activity has been , as reported by his ...
... faculty ( Table 6.8 ) . Asking the faculty members whom they had been talking to about the deanship , we use ( a ) how people report their own activity , and ( b ) what each faculty member's activity has been , as reported by his ...
Page 124
... faculty was not really involved , this was even more true for some other groups . The students were never really activated . No new representative was appointed when the student member of the search committee left the campus , and the ...
... faculty was not really involved , this was even more true for some other groups . The students were never really activated . No new representative was appointed when the student member of the search committee left the campus , and the ...
Page 186
... faculty rarely do more than condition slightly and ratify the actions of the departments and individual teachers ... faculty handbook . Consider as a first example of academic policy the academic expecta- tions of faculty and students ...
... faculty rarely do more than condition slightly and ratify the actions of the departments and individual teachers ... faculty handbook . Consider as a first example of academic policy the academic expecta- tions of faculty and students ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote