Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page 31
... handle successfully . Decision - makers use their energy in areas in which they have success , or about which they have concern , or in which they find pleasure . There is societal segmentation . Even the simplest societies order or ...
... handle successfully . Decision - makers use their energy in areas in which they have success , or about which they have concern , or in which they find pleasure . There is societal segmentation . Even the simplest societies order or ...
Page 246
... handle , then the participants actively undertake to eject some of the problems they had previously accepted . Thus , energy deficit calculations appear to be essential elements of the garbage ejection process under deadline conditions ...
... handle , then the participants actively undertake to eject some of the problems they had previously accepted . Thus , energy deficit calculations appear to be essential elements of the garbage ejection process under deadline conditions ...
Page 317
... handle and very time - consuming . ( c ) The department had a strong need for making joint decisions . Projects had become very expensive . When one group got money , all the others were affected . Thus , the department needed an ...
... handle and very time - consuming . ( c ) The department had a strong need for making joint decisions . Projects had become very expensive . When one group got money , all the others were affected . Thus , the department needed an ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote