Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 21
Page 326
... Physics than in most other places . In this way it would be important to provide a model which could be used in future bargaining in other departments . However , the garbage can moved too fast in the first period . The participation ...
... Physics than in most other places . In this way it would be important to provide a model which could be used in future bargaining in other departments . However , the garbage can moved too fast in the first period . The participation ...
Page 334
... Physics . The external critique of university governance found the reorganization garbage can attractive here , as it did in many universities around the world . First , the criticism raised through several publications of the ...
... Physics . The external critique of university governance found the reorganization garbage can attractive here , as it did in many universities around the world . First , the criticism raised through several publications of the ...
Page 336
... physics to interpret what had taken part in the physics department . While our data indicate that the rewriting of the constitution had only moderate effects upon the everyday life of the Department of Physics , the results were ...
... physics to interpret what had taken part in the physics department . While our data indicate that the rewriting of the constitution had only moderate effects upon the everyday life of the Department of Physics , the results were ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsų Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote