Reports of Patent Causes: Decided in the Circuit Courts of the United States Since January 1, 1874, Volume 5L. K. Strouse & Company, 1883 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 80
Page 9
... an analysis of it in detail , I am of opinion that both the mechanism and application of the principle involved in its operation are shown to have been Gottfried v . Phillip Best Brewing Co. the product of DECEMBER , 1879 . 9.
... an analysis of it in detail , I am of opinion that both the mechanism and application of the principle involved in its operation are shown to have been Gottfried v . Phillip Best Brewing Co. the product of DECEMBER , 1879 . 9.
Page 27
... shown the drawing of which the model in evidence is a representation , he says that when he saw the machine they did not use the kind of blower represented in the drawing . The witness Emma Stelcener , who is a daughter of Beck , says ...
... shown the drawing of which the model in evidence is a representation , he says that when he saw the machine they did not use the kind of blower represented in the drawing . The witness Emma Stelcener , who is a daughter of Beck , says ...
Page 31
... shown in his model . All are agreed , even the members of his family , that the instrument used for creating a draft of air through the fire was an ordinary blacksmith bellows , and it seems difficult to under- stand , if this be so ...
... shown in his model . All are agreed , even the members of his family , that the instrument used for creating a draft of air through the fire was an ordinary blacksmith bellows , and it seems difficult to under- stand , if this be so ...
Page 43
... shown by the patents which had been granted before 1858 , and upon the facts thus proved , denied the valid . ity of the Whitcomb patent , and that the defendants in- fringed it . LOWELL , J. Edgarton v . Breck . I do DECEMBER , 1879 . 43.
... shown by the patents which had been granted before 1858 , and upon the facts thus proved , denied the valid . ity of the Whitcomb patent , and that the defendants in- fringed it . LOWELL , J. Edgarton v . Breck . I do DECEMBER , 1879 . 43.
Page 45
... shown and described , whereby the head is supported above the rear upper edge of the axle , as shown , and the lower ends of the teeth , when gathering the hay , occupy positions in rear of the head of the wheels , and forward of a ...
... shown and described , whereby the head is supported above the rear upper edge of the axle , as shown , and the lower ends of the teeth , when gathering the hay , occupy positions in rear of the head of the wheels , and forward of a ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
18 Blatchf alleged apparatus application armature arranged assignment Atlantic Giant attached barrel bill blast BLATCHFORD bobbin Burglar Alarm Telegraph cask circuit breaker Circuit Court combination complainant complainant's patent construction covered cylinder decree defendant's defendants device Diamond Rock diaphragm Dittmar drawings edge EQUITY evidence fact fendant filed flange frame Francestown Gottfried heat held Holbeck Holmes Burglar Alarm hot blast improvement infringement injunction interlocutory decree inventor issued jointer kerosene license machine Manufacturing Massachusetts mechanical ment metal mode motion nitro-glycerine Nöbel operation original patent parties patent granted Patent Office Phillip Best Brewing piston plaintiff plaintiff's patent plate pocket powder prior profits proof purpose question rails ratchet-wheel reissued letters patent reissued patent result screw second claim set screw shoe shown side specification spindle substantially as described suit Sutherland Falls Term of patent testimony tion U. S. Stat valid vibrating WHEELER wire xyloidine York
Popular passages
Page 301 - ... upon a decree being rendered in any such case for an infringement the complainant shall be entitled to recover, in addition to the profits to be accounted for by the defendant, the damages the complainant has sustained thereby; and the court shall assess the same or cause the same to be assessed under its direction.
Page 368 - ... that there was probable cause for the act done by the collector or other officer, or that he acted under the directions of the Secretary of the Treasury or other proper officer of the Government, no execution shall issue against such collector or other officer, but the amount so recovered shall, upon final judgment, be provided for and paid out of the proper appropriation from the Treasury.
Page 238 - And no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against an inhabitant of the United States, by any original process in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, or in which he shall be found at the time of serving the writ...
Page 148 - But every patent granted for an invention which has been previously patented in a foreign country shall be so limited as to expire at the same time with the foreign patent, or, if there be more than one, at the same time with the one having the shortest term, and in no case shall it be in force more than seventeen years...
Page 33 - it is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not.
Page 368 - When a recovery is had in any suit or proceeding against a collector or other officer of the revenue for any act done by him, or for the recovery of any money exacted by or paid to him and by him paid into the Treasury...
Page 294 - ... granting to such petitioner, his heirs, administrators or assigns, for any term not exceeding fourteen years, the sole and exclusive right and liberty of making, using and vending to others to be used, the said invention or discovery.
Page 146 - Commissioner that the same had been invented or discovered by any other person in this country prior to the alleged invention or discovery thereof by the applicant...
Page 159 - That every patent shall be assignable in law, either as to the whole interest, or any undivided part thereof, by any instrument in writing; which assignment, and also every grant and conveyance of the exclusive right under any patent, to make and use, and to grant to others to make and use, the thing patented within and throughout any specified part or portion of the United State.1?, shall be recorded in the Patent Office within three months from the execution thereof, for which the assignee or grantee...
Page 587 - That such power to punish contempts shall not be construed to extend to any cases except the misbehavior of any person in their presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice...