UNION, EASTERN. [See Eastern Union.]

UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Buffalo, N. Y. Organized 1874; capital, $200,000. O. E. Foster, president; John H. Lascelles, vice-president; C. Lee Abell, secretary.

UNION INSURANCE COMPANY (Marine), Bangor, Me. Organized 1862; capital, $300,000. A. F. Stetson, president; A. W. Staples, secretary.

UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, Pittsburgh, Pa. Organized 1871; capital, $100,000. A. W. Mellon, president; Thos. Walker, vice-president; J. W. J. McLain, secretary; Edwin J. Krueger, general agent.

UNION MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., OF LIVERPOOL, England. H. K. Fowler, United States manager, New York.

UNION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Montpelier, Vt. Organized 1875. James W. Brock, president; Herbert F. Brigham, vice-president; Harlan W. Kemp, secretary; Ralph B. Denny, treasurer.

UNION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Providence, R. I Organized_1863. Frederick W. Moses, president and treasurer; Charles G. Easton, vice-president; Clarence H. Cady, secretary; Carlos F. Hunt, assistant secretary.

UNION, THE, an association of officials of fire insurance companies doing business in the Western and Northwestern states, often called, for sake of distinctiveness, the "Western Union," has its headquarters in the city of Chicago.

The Union has jurisdiction over Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, except as modified or restricted by the laws of the respective states.

The "governing committee" is appointed by the president of The Union, and is composed of two classes, the first of members whose terms expire in September, annually, and the second of members whose terms expire in April, annually.

At the annual meeting held at Hartford, Conn., in September, 1917, officers were elected for the year as follows: President, John Marshall, Jr., Chicago; vice-president, C. R. Tuttle, Chicago; secretary, Edward B. Hatch, Chicago.

The following constitute the Governing Committee: C. R. Street, Chairman, J. W. Cochran, J. C. Corbet, C. R. Tuttle, terms expiring April, 1919; George H. Batchelder, Dugan & Carr, Thos. E. Gallagher, Fred S. James, C. A. Ludlum, terms expiring September, 1918.

The following is a list of companies composing the membership,

UNION COMPANIES, MAY 7, 1918

UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Pittsburgh, Pa. Organized 1873; capital, $200,000. W. J. Patterson, president; W. H. Barker, vice-president; E. P. Niebaum, secretary.

UNITED BRITISH INSURANCE COMPANY, LT'D., London, Eng. Entered the United States in 1918 to transact a fire and marine business. C. P. Stewart & Co., Inc., New York, United States managers; George A. Viehmann and Gresham Ennis, underwriters for the fire insurance department; Wade Robinson, marine underwriter.

UNITED DRUGGISTS' MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Boston, Mass. Organized 1908. Louis K. Liggett, president; James C. Beady, vice-president; James C. McCormick, treasurer; Archie W. Campbell, secretary; Wm. H. Abare, assistant secretary.

UNITED FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY of Philadelphia; incorporated April 1, 1860, and began business on April 2, 1861; capital, $400,000. President, William H. Clark; vice-president, Thos. K. Ober, Jr.; secretary, M. B. Yates; treasurer, Jas. M. Canning; assistant secretary, Wm. G. Wible.

UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, New York City. Organized 1824; capital, $1,400,000. George R. Branson, president; Chas. A. Norris, M. L. Allen, F. H. Douglass, vicepresidents; D. G. Wakeman, secretary.

URBAINE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Paris, France. Organized 1838. Fred S. James & Co., New York and Chicago, United States managers.

USE AND OCCUPANCY INSURANCE.* Use and Occupancy Insurance," in the broad sense, insurance against the loss caused by fire in the way of interruption of business in a going concern, has had but a comparatively small development in the United States, and much of that development has apparently been in a wrong direction. There are two chief reasons for this. In the first place, in those states requiring or encouraging the use of a standard fire policy there is no separate provision for insuring contingent interests, such as rents, profits, use and occupancy, leasehold interest, etc., although these interests manifestly cannot be properly covered under the ordinary standard fire policy, with its express exclusion of loss due to interruption of business, its requirement for the payment of any loss in one sum and at one time, and its manifold minor provisions designed only for regular property insurance and losses. And in the next place, partly because a higher rate is ordinarily charged for so-called profit insurance than for so-called use and occupancy insurance, and partly because of the failure to understand and measure the real interest sought to be covered, the forms employed have been confused, evasive, or quite inadequate.

By Willis O. Robb, Manager, New York Fire Insurance Exchange, New York.

The first of these handicaps can be overcome only by amending or overriding the statutes enacting and establishing the standard policy; either greater liberty must be given fire underwriters by the law in the matter of insuring these contingent interests, or riders largely modifying the regular provisions of the standard fire policy for the sake of a clear cover for such interests must be employed and tolerated. The removal of the second handicap would appear to be mainly a question of education.

Strictly speaking, use and occupancy insurance, as was held in the well-known New York Court of Appeals case of Michael vs. the Prussian National Insurance Company, the so-called Buffalo Grain Elevator case, covers only the loss to the owner or occupant of the ability to use the property described in the policy. In the Tanenbaum cases in the Supreme Court of the same state, it was expressly, and no doubt properly, held that "use and occupancy,' as that expression is used in a contract to procure insurance which was described only by that term, was not and could not be profits from earnings, however ascertainable. Apparently, therefore, use and occupancy in its proper sense is substantially the same as rental value, and to be measured in the same way as to insurable value and recoverable loss. But as understood by American underwriters generally, use and occupancy insurance is a form of contract that promises to indemnify the policyholder (usually a manufacturer) at a certain rate per day, in case of total interruption, and at a pro rata of that rate in case of partial interruption, caused by a fire in his premises. Only the vaguest understanding of the proper method of fixing that per diem rate, or the total insurable value of the interest insured, is usually found among either underwriters or policyholders. That is because they do not clearly see, or (on account of the question of rate already referred to) do not wish to acknowledge, that what the applicant wants and the underwriter should furnish is simply and solely a form of profit insurance, not use and occupancy insurance at all, in the proper sense of that expression. In England, this kind of insurance has been for more than a dozen years more correctly handled as the profit insurance it really is, on a form specially adopted throughout to its precise purpose, with great resulting advantage to the public and to the underwriters, so that a really important new branch of fire insurance has been developed. A recent English writer on this subject is therefore quite justified in referring to the American practice in the following curt fashion:

"In the United States of America, a scheme called Use and Occupancy is the system which is intended to compensate the insured for the loss of profits by fire. The company issuing a Use and Occupancy policy agrees to pay a pro rata amount of the sum insured for each day the business is entirely stopped, and in proportion in the event of a partial interruption. It is unnecessary to say that such a system cannot assess the loss of profits sustained, except in businesses where the turnover does not fluctuate. Such businesses are so few that a use and occupancy policy is of little commercial value."

It is true that this summary dismissal of the American Use and Occupancy policy does a little less than justice to it through failure to perceive that, however inaccurate a measuring rod a fixed per diem

"

may be wherewith to measure a fluctuating rate of profit, it is, after all, likely to produce a fair average of result operating through any considerable period. But certainly the English method described by this same writer (Mr. Alex B. Wright, Insurance Against Loss of Profits by Fire Consequential Loss," London, 1912, C. & E. Layton) is vastly more flexible, equitable, and attractive. Under that method the applicant indicates whether he wishes to insure net profits only, or fixed charges only, or the two together under the general name of profits, and whether the basis or standard for measuring the loss is to be the "turnover," measured in money, or the output,' measured in quantity of goods produced. Then, for instance, if profits plus fixed charges are to be insured, and turnover is to be the standard, he is given insurance for the amount he declares his net profits plus fixed charges for a year would represent, and on the occurrence of a loss the actual annual turnover is ascertained, along with the percentage which net profits plus fixed charges have constituted of that turnover, and this percentage is applied to the reduction or loss of turnover due to the interruption by fire, thus giving the profit loss pure and simple, to which will be added the items constituting the increased cost of working necessarily incurred in continuing the business. Several necessary safeguards are introduced into the contract, so that, for instance, if fixed charges were not, in fact, continued after the occurrence of the fire, a corresponding deduction would be made from the amount of the adjustment. Under the English practice the period of liability as distinguished from the term of the policy is limited to a definite number of months following the fire, usually, though not always, less than a year. If in a given case it were longer than a year, instead of taking the annual turnover as the basis or standard of adjustment, the turnover for the longer period of liability is used, while, if the period of liability is a year or less, the standard or basis of adjustment is the annual turnover only. Usually, an audit is made once a month after the occurrence of the fire, until the full restoration of productivity, and monthly payments on account are made by the underwriters, though of course the ascertainment of the basis of entire adjustment, namely, the volume of the annual turnover and the percentage of that turnover represented by profits, is made immediately after the loss occurs. A number of minor checks, balances, and safeguards are introduced into the system, but this synopsis will sufficiently indicate the general character of the English handling of this subject and its manifest superiority to the practice in common use in the United States.

UTAH HOME FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Salt Lake City, Utah. Organized 1886; capital, $300,000. Heber J. Grant, president; George Romney and H. G. Whitney, vice-presidents; Geo. J. Cannon, secretary; Edgar S. Hills, treasurer.

The company, formerly the Home Fire, adopted its present name in 1918.