Rules of Evidence: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, First Session, Volume 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973 - 589 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 65
Page 1
... Preliminary Draft of 1969 nor the Revised Draft of 1971 made provision for a privilege of this kind . The position taken in those drafts was not based upon any conclusion that government files , except to the extent made privileged by ...
... Preliminary Draft of 1969 nor the Revised Draft of 1971 made provision for a privilege of this kind . The position taken in those drafts was not based upon any conclusion that government files , except to the extent made privileged by ...
Page 3
... preliminary proof of authenticity when so provided by Act of Congress . ( p . 146 ) The Advisory Committee's Note cites several illustrative statutes . ( p . 148 ) Rule 1001 ( 4 ) . The Advisory Committee's Note refers to cited ...
... preliminary proof of authenticity when so provided by Act of Congress . ( p . 146 ) The Advisory Committee's Note cites several illustrative statutes . ( p . 148 ) Rule 1001 ( 4 ) . The Advisory Committee's Note refers to cited ...
Page 4
... Preliminary Draft . Several factors underlay the discussion : much preliminary matter is harmless , regardless of the eventual ruling of the judge ; much that is admissible on the issue of admissibility is also admissible as bearing on ...
... Preliminary Draft . Several factors underlay the discussion : much preliminary matter is harmless , regardless of the eventual ruling of the judge ; much that is admissible on the issue of admissibility is also admissible as bearing on ...
Page 30
... Preliminary Study of the Feasibility of Developing Uniform Rules of Evidence for the Federal Courts , " 30 F.R.D. 79 , 97–98 ( 1961 ) . On the subject of freedom of federal courts from state rules covering the scope of cross ...
... Preliminary Study of the Feasibility of Developing Uniform Rules of Evidence for the Federal Courts , " 30 F.R.D. 79 , 97–98 ( 1961 ) . On the subject of freedom of federal courts from state rules covering the scope of cross ...
Page 36
... preliminary question , such as the volu itariness of a confession , this is not to be taken as a complete waiver . Many cases limit the waiver to the particular issue , because it is felt that to do otherwise would penalize the defen ...
... preliminary question , such as the volu itariness of a confession , this is not to be taken as a complete waiver . Many cases limit the waiver to the particular issue , because it is felt that to do otherwise would penalize the defen ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accused admissible adopted Advisory Committee Advisory Committee's Note amendment apply ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Article authority believe Chairman character character evidence civil claim Code of Evidence common law concerning Congress constitutional conviction counsel credibility crime Criminal Justice cross-examination decision declarant defendant deleted direct examination disclosure District draft effect fact federal courts Federal Criminal Laws fifth amendment hearing hearsay exceptions hearsay rule HERBERT E HOFFMAN impeachment issue Judicial Conference judicial notice Judiciary limited litigation matter McCormick officer party permit person physician-patient privilege practice preliminary present presumption prior inconsistent statements prior statement privilege problem Procedure proposed Federal Rules proposed rule question reason record Reform of Federal relevant requirement Rules of Evidence self-incrimination Special Subcommittee specific statute Subcommittee on Criminal Subcommittee on Reform subdivision submitted substantial suggested supra Supreme Court testify tion trial judge Trial Lawyers trustworthiness United United States Code waiver Washington Wigmore WILLIAM L
Popular passages
Page 7 - Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
Page 124 - The head of each department is authorized to prescribe regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the government of his department, the conduct of its officers and clerks, the distribution and performance of its business, and the custody, use. and preservation of the records, papers, and property appertaining to it.
Page 61 - Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, to which the various advisory committees report.
Page 386 - A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, unless the source of information...
Page 253 - The court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, (2) avoid needless consumption of time, and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
Page 327 - ... (8) contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or (9) geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
Page 164 - ... a juror may testify on the question whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury's attention or whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror.
Page 156 - Except as otherwise required by the Constitution of the United States or provided by Act of Congress or in rules prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority, the privilege of a witness, person, government, State, or political subdivision thereof shall be governed by the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason...
Page 369 - When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken previously, would have made the event less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event.
Page 171 - A witness so appointed shall be informed of his duties by the court in writing, a copy of which shall be filed with the clerk, or at a conference in which the parties shall have opportunity to participate.