Miller's Law of Freight Loss and Damage ClaimsFirst published in 1948 under title : Motor carrier loss and damage claims. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 204
Tucker , 138 F. 2d 796 ) Some courts hold that the carrier's duty to notify the consignor of nondelivery is not absolute , however , but depends upon the circumstances involved . ( Porter v . Pennsylvania R. Co. , 215 N. Y. S. 727 ...
Tucker , 138 F. 2d 796 ) Some courts hold that the carrier's duty to notify the consignor of nondelivery is not absolute , however , but depends upon the circumstances involved . ( Porter v . Pennsylvania R. Co. , 215 N. Y. S. 727 ...
Page 301
The court held that under the circumstances peculiar to the case , the more accurate measure of damage of the shortage would be the wholesale price , since it was capable of replacement and was in fact replaced , in the course of the ...
The court held that under the circumstances peculiar to the case , the more accurate measure of damage of the shortage would be the wholesale price , since it was capable of replacement and was in fact replaced , in the course of the ...
Page 374
those which are the actual , but not the necessary , result of the injury complained of , and which in fact follow it as a natural and proximate consequence in a particular case , that is , by reason of special circumstances or ...
those which are the actual , but not the necessary , result of the injury complained of , and which in fact follow it as a natural and proximate consequence in a particular case , that is , by reason of special circumstances or ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Condition of Shipment at Delivery to Carrier | 133 |
Connecting Carriers | 163 |
Conversion and Misdelivery | 176 |
Copyright | |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept action actual agent amount apparent apply arrived authority bill of lading caused charges Chicago circumstances claim claimant Commission common carrier condition connection consignee container contents contract cost court court held decision defendant delay delivered delivery destination determine duty effect entitled established evidence Express fact failed failure filed freight further give given held holding indicated injury inspection Interstate Commerce involved issued liability limitation Lines loading loss or damage lost market value matter measure ment motor carrier nature negligence notice occurred original owner packed party person plaintiff possession protection purchaser question rail railroad Railway rates reasonable receipt received recover recovery refused regulations responsible result rule shipment shipped shipper sold specified suit tariff transportation truck United usually York