Miller's Law of Freight Loss and Damage ClaimsFirst published in 1948 under title : Motor carrier loss and damage claims. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 5
It is not within the scope of the present volume to test this thesis or , assuming it sound , to determine whether the forces of competition are sufficiently at work in the field of transportation to justify a major change in the law of ...
It is not within the scope of the present volume to test this thesis or , assuming it sound , to determine whether the forces of competition are sufficiently at work in the field of transportation to justify a major change in the law of ...
Page 68
which the goods were delivered and by which the bill of lading was issued without being compelled to investigate to determine the identity of the carrier responsible for the damage . The effect of Section 20 ( 11 ) is to impose upon the ...
which the goods were delivered and by which the bill of lading was issued without being compelled to investigate to determine the identity of the carrier responsible for the damage . The effect of Section 20 ( 11 ) is to impose upon the ...
Page 264
If the carrier is unable to determine whether or not the right exists to stop the goods , the carrier may , instead ... his own security resort to legal proceedings to have the question determined , as in the case of adverse claimants .
If the carrier is unable to determine whether or not the right exists to stop the goods , the carrier may , instead ... his own security resort to legal proceedings to have the question determined , as in the case of adverse claimants .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Condition of Shipment at Delivery to Carrier | 133 |
Connecting Carriers | 163 |
Conversion and Misdelivery | 176 |
Copyright | |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept action actual agent amount apparent apply arrived authority bill of lading caused charges Chicago circumstances claim claimant Commission common carrier condition connection consignee container contents contract cost court court held decision defendant delay delivered delivery destination determine duty effect entitled established evidence Express fact failed failure filed freight further give given held holding indicated injury inspection Interstate Commerce involved issued liability limitation Lines loading loss or damage lost market value matter measure ment motor carrier nature negligence notice occurred original owner packed party person plaintiff possession protection purchaser question rail railroad Railway rates reasonable receipt received recover recovery refused regulations responsible result rule shipment shipped shipper sold specified suit tariff transportation truck United usually York