Hard Power: The New Politics of National SecurityBasic Books, 2006 M10 3 - 319 pages Our ideas about national security have changed radically over the last five years. It has become a political tool, a "wedge issue," a symbol of pride and fear. It is also the one issue above all others that can make or break an election. And this is why the Democratic Party has been steadily losing power since 2001. In Hard Power, Michael O'Hanlon, an expert on foreign policy at the Brookings Institution, and Kurt Campbell, an authority on international security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, explain how the Democrats lost credibility on issues of security and foreign policy, how they can get it back--and why they must. They recall the successful Democratic military legacy of past decades, as well as recent Democratic innovations--like the Homeland Security Office and the idea of nation-building--that have been successfully co-opted by the Republican administration. And, most importantly, they develop a broad national security vision for America, including specific defense policies and a strategy to win the war on terror. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 48
Page
... role of energy to a new strategy to win the war on terror . Rather than promote partisan opposition , the authors present a better blend of hard and soft power , of ( continued on back flap ) Advance Praise for Hard Power " This is a ...
... role of energy to a new strategy to win the war on terror . Rather than promote partisan opposition , the authors present a better blend of hard and soft power , of ( continued on back flap ) Advance Praise for Hard Power " This is a ...
Page xii
... role too . O'Hanlon decided to write a piece staking a claim to the Democrats ' con- tribution to this triumph . To his surprise , not a single Democratic strategist or spinner picked up on the idea of taking credit for the successful ...
... role too . O'Hanlon decided to write a piece staking a claim to the Democrats ' con- tribution to this triumph . To his surprise , not a single Democratic strategist or spinner picked up on the idea of taking credit for the successful ...
Page 1
... role for themselves as a loyal opposition party in a democracy at war . " The tendency to conflate Republicanism with loyalty and Democracy with treason assumed [ various forms ] during these war years . For radi- cal Republicans ...
... role for themselves as a loyal opposition party in a democracy at war . " The tendency to conflate Republicanism with loyalty and Democracy with treason assumed [ various forms ] during these war years . For radi- cal Republicans ...
Page 4
... role in the world , and just a third thinks that the government has done a good job of protecting the country . Such figures are especially startling when compared to the strong consensus about America's interests and role in the world ...
... role in the world , and just a third thinks that the government has done a good job of protecting the country . Such figures are especially startling when compared to the strong consensus about America's interests and role in the world ...
Page 22
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
Its the War Stupid Why National Security Is the Essential Electoral Issue | 11 |
Irag The Myth of Republican Superiority and the Future | 47 |
Managing the Military | 75 |
Homeland Security Taking It to the Next Level | 119 |
Winning the Long War | 137 |
The Real Triple Threat Energy and Security Global Climate Change and Terrorist Financing | 159 |
Other editions - View all
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt Campbell,Michael O'Hanlon Limited preview - 2007 |
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt M. Campbell,Michael E. O'Hanlon Limited preview - 2006 |
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt Campbell,Michael O'Hanlon No preview available - 2007 |
Common terms and phrases
accessed addition allow American approach armed Asia attacks become better billion Brookings budget build Bush administration campaign candidate challenges China Chinese Clinton continue costs create critical dangerous deal defense democracy Democrats Department develop East economic effective efforts election energy example fact forces foreign foreign policy fuel further future George given global greater groups ideas important improve increase initiative Institute Iran Iraq Iraqi Islamic issues Kurds leaders least less major March matters means Michael military mission national security national-security North Korea nuclear Office operations party percent planning political possible President prevent problem produce progress protect recent region Relations remains Report Republicans require response result rise role Senator stabilization strategy strong successful terrorism terrorist threat tion troops types United Washington weapons