Page images
PDF
EPUB

Magazine of Western History.

Vol. XIV.

SEPTEMBER, 1891.

No. 5.

THE GLACIAL THEORY A FALLACY.

The theory of a glacial period, . or ice age, has been accepted by many of our modern geologists. But it does not follow that the theory has been verified, or that geologists are infallible in their conclusions.

The glacial theory' is a child of the nineteenth century. It was born about the year 1840, at the foot of the Alps. Its godfathers were men of renown in matters of science, who assumed to interpret the language of Nature, as spoken in her ice domains, and to reveal the methods of her work. In a word, they were emulous of making new discoveries in science.

The idea of a glacial period was suggested by the discovery that the glaciers of the Alps are constantly sliding by slow degrees from their sublime heights down into the adjacent valleys, where they melt and deposit what are called "moraines," which are but the debris left by melted glaciers. In many instances glaciers carry with them huge rocks or boulders, which they disrupt from the mountains as they descend into the

valleys. In connection with rock they often detatch and precipitate extensive masses of earth to a lower level, thus changing the natural aspects of the land in the vicinity.

From this state of facts and the stretch of a vivid imagination the advocates of the glacial theory infer that there was, at some time in the remote past, a "glacial period" of many thousand years' duration, when the greater part of both the northern and southern hemispheres of the globe was covered with snow and ice from one to eight miles or more in depth, as estimated by glacial rules, and that these immense fields of snow and ice slid inch by inch from the polar regions towards the equator, a distance of about two thousand miles, ploughing their way over the highest mountains and deepest valleys, in spite of the law of gravity and a globular upgrade, and that they, in their course, excavated the basins of most of our great as well as small lakes, rivers and valleys, striated the rocks, transported boulders, distributed the drift or soil which has

given to the earth its fertility, and finally expired in the temperate zones, where they melted and marked the spot of their decease with a line of gravestones or "terminal moraines.”

This hypothesis seems as incredible as it is inconsistent with the imperative law of gravity, which would hold. the glaciers as solidly in place as it holds the Rocky Mountains in place. The glaciers would not only have to slide in opposition to the law of gravity, but in opposition to a globular upgrade caused by the earth's equatorial axis being twenty-seven miles longer than its polar axis.

How all this could happen, or by what natural law these vast icefields, covering both the northern and southern hemispheres during the glacial period, were generated, recruited and preserved in their movement for thousands of years, none of the eminent advocates of the glacial theory have condescended to tell us, or to give us any reasons for such an occurrence which are consistent with natural law or logical inference.

We all know that rain and snow are generated by the evaporation of water under the influence of heat. The vapors ascend into a higher and colder region of atmosphere where they condense and fall in the form of rain or snow. The two hemispheric ice-fields of the glacial period could not by their own pressure have generated a sufficient degree of heat to produce vapors and at the same time slide in a congealing atmosphere, and thus prolong their

existence by the fall of additional rain

or snow.

If the glacial period ever existed, as claimed, it existed in violation of all known physical laws. All the waters of the globe are insufficient to have furnished the depths of snow that are said to have enwrapped both the northern and southern hemispheres for thousands of years. It has been carefully estimated that if the globe were reduced to an even round surface and all its waters equally diffused over it, the uniform depth of water would be less than one mile. In the light of this fact the entire waters of the globe, if frozen, when thus diffused, would not equal the depth of snow and ice that existed in the glacial period, which was, as our glacialists say, from one to eight miles thick, or more.

Glacialists cannot assume with any consistency that the sun ever failed to shed his rays on the earth as he now does, nor that the earth ever wandered from her orbit, or reversed her axis; nor can they assume or prove, by astronomical calculation, that the precession of the equinoxes, in the course of twenty-one thousand years, resulted in the production of the glacial era. If there ever were any such irregularities, the earth and sun must have changed their relations to each other, and all the rivers, lakes and seas, north and south of the equator, must been frozen to solidity, and, of course, all animal and vegetable life must have perished. Nature has never been known to stultify herself, nor does she

work miracles in violation of her own fixed laws.

It seems evident, therefore, that the so-called "glacial period" of the past was nothing more than the glacial period of the present. All the mountains that lift their heads above the snow-line, wherever located, are capped with snow and ice, and consequently generate more or less massive glaciers, which slide sluggishly into the adjoining valleys, where they melt and leave their debris, or slide, if located near the ocean, into its waters, where they float in the character of icebergs.

Many of these icebergs are immense in their dimensions as well as formidable in their antagonism. They are, in fact, Nature's ships at sea engaged in the commerce of the polar regions with the temperate zones. Their keels are spiked with boulders that striate the rocks in the ocean-bed, and pulverize mineral substances into sediments which, when hardened by heat and pressure, constitute the sheets of clay and stratified rocks which are found in ocean-beds; the counterparts of which are also found beneath the drift or soil of the dry land, and in which are imbedded more or less primitive shells and relics of the flora and fauna of different climes.

The general aspects of the earth's crust, whether under water or above water, are much the same. The oceanbeds have their mountains, hills, plains and valleys. In the course of unmeasured time ocean beds are lifted

into the sunlight of continents, and continents sunk into the darkness of ocean-beds. In Nature's calendar there is no recognition of time. She works in the "eternal now," slowly for the most part, but sometimes violently. By an interchange of continents with ocean-beds she recruits impoverished soils, and prepares new conditions for the production of a still higher order of plant and animal life, and probably a higher order of man.

The crust of the earth has been estimated to be from ten to fifty miles thick. It is doubtless much thinner at some points than at others. Its interior is believed to be composed of molten minerals, which, when cooled, constitute the earth's crust. This vast interior mass includes in all probability more than nine-tenths of the entire material of the globe.

It may be inferred, therefore, that the earth's interior is a billowy sea of molten matter, rolling in majestic fluctuations, or tidal waves, ever beating and breaking against the inside of the earth's crust with a violence that disrupts it, or results at long periods in upheavals and subsidences of continents, throwing both the stratified and conglomerate rocks into strange relations to each other. It is this sublime and irresistible work of Nature which has so distinctly marked in the primitive rocks the succession of the geological ages. There is no reasonable doubt that the igneous and aqueous forces, acting slowly or violently, are the dominant agencies which Nature

employes in the execution of her evolutionary work. She could not, if she would, call to her aid a glacial period.

ocean.

Strange as it may seem, the earth has three oceans, an atmospheric ocean, a surface ocean, and an interior These three oceans are constantly engaged in working out the same ultimate problem and are governed by the same general law of circulation. They all have their currents and counter-currents. The activities of the atmospheric ocean are generated by heat and cold, at different points. The results are counter-currents of hot and cold winds, rain and snow, thunder and lightning, cloudbursts and cyclones. The surface ocean has similar activities for similar reasons, resulting in thermal currents, cold currents, tidal waves, and waterspouts. The interior ocean gives birth to earthquakes, volcanoes, upheavals and subsidences. It is the sublime and violent work of these several oceans that has given to the earth its present aspects. The one ocean sometimes aids the other in a subordinate capacity. Yet all act in harmony and with a view, seemingly, to achieve the same evolutionary results.

It was unquestionably rapid currents of water, or floods in connection with icebergs at sea, that transported both the boulders and the relics of the flora and fauna of different climes from their original localities and deposited them in foreign localities. foreign localities where they are now found on the surface, or imbedded in clay or drift, the

world over. It was rapid currents of water that polished many of the transported boulders, while some were transported in the rough state in which they fell from their birthplace in the mountains upon the surface of floating icebergs at sea, or were hurled broadcast by volcanic explosion. this may have occured in some sections of the earth at one time, and in other sections at another time, and probably did. The changes in the aspects of the earth, thus wrought, are in harmony with Nature's geological record of events.

The fallacy of the glacial theory cannot be better illustrated, perhaps, than by alluding to the views expressed by some of our enthusiastic glacialists in reference to the origin of our Great Northwestern Lakes. They say there was a preglacial period in which these lakes did not exist, except as a great river; and that in the subsequent glacial period, or ice age, huge glaciers followed the line of this river, exca. vated its channel into a series of lake basins, and filled up the interspaces with deposits of drift.

But when we take into consideration the extent and depth of these lakes, it seems not only improbable, but impossible that the excavation of their rocky basins was the work of glacial action. If we may accept the report of the United States Survey, the maximum depth of Lake Superior is 1008 feet, Huron 750 feet, Michigan 870 feet, Erie 270 feet and Ontario 500 feet. It is also shown by the same report

that they all have a mean height above the level of the sea of 517 feet, and a mean depth below the level of the sea of 271 feet, and that the total area of their surface exceeds the total area of England, Scotland and Wales, while the distance, on a central line, from the head of Lake Superior to the foot of Lake Ontario, exceeds twelve hundred miles. If we can believe our Great Lakes were excavated by glacial action, we can with equal reason believe that glaciers excavated the Red Sea, or Gulf of Mexico.

The entire region of our Great Lakes has evidently been, at some remote period, subjected to violent disturbances. This fact induces the supposition that they were originally a range of mountains, and that they suddenly collapsed during an upheaval and subsidence of the entire lake region. This suggestion seems verified by the testimony of the rocks which encircle the lakes. Some of these rocks have a volcanic appearance, while others crop out that belong to the primitive geological series.

It can hardly be doubted that the St. Lawrence river valley and the lake region were included in the same general volcanic disturbance. The rocky channels of both the St. Lawrence and Niagara strengthen the supposition, and what should remove all reasonable doubt is the fact that iron and other metals, the products of volcanic action, are found at various points along the line of these rivers and lakes in connection with relics of the flora

and fauna of widely different climes.

On the southern border of Lake Erie, near Cleveland, a Cleveland company, in boring for gas, in 1889, struck a bed of solid salt, fifty feet thick or more, at the depth of one thousand feet. This fact, in connection with many others that might be cited, proves that the lake region was at one time submerged beneath the waters of the ocean, and that, at an upheaval, it retained in a valley or basin of the earth's crust a broad sheet of salt water, which, by subsequent heat and pressure, crystalized and became salt.

In fact, it would seem that the entire valley of the Mississippi from the Alleghenies to the Rocky Mountains. must have been submerged and upheaved, probably at the same time with the lake region, if we may judge from the volcanic rocks and mineral deposits which abound in different parts of the valley's broad domains.

In Louisiana, an oil company, in 1886, struck, at the depth of six hundred and fifteen feet, an extensive bed of pure sulphur, twenty feet thick, which was unquestionably deposited by volcanic action in some remote geological age.

We have further proof of volcanic disturbances in the fact that there are three distinct ridges of land bordering the southerly shore of Lake Erie, which are composed of the same material as the present shore, and which correspond with its angles. These ridges lie from one to three miles apart, and vary in height above the

« PreviousContinue »