The Constitutional Rights of Women: Cases in Law and Social ChangeUniversity of Wisconsin Press, 1988 - 637 pages Goldstein provides a legal casebook examining women's constitutional rights as determined by U.S. Supreme Court decisions. This revised and updated edition of her 1979 work contains cases through the 1987 Supreme Court term. The cases discuss women's rights and 20th-century civil rights concepts equal protection of the laws, discriminatory practices, and privacy. The analysis traces the interactions between social change movements and the law and gives careful attention to concurring and dissenting opinions. This book is highly recommended for persons interested in law, social movements, and civil rights dimensions in our society. Steven Puro, St. Louis Univ. Copyright 1988 Cahners Business Information. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 344
... state laws have held that the State's determinations to protect health or pre- natal life are dominant and constitutionally justifiable . IX The District Court held that the ap- pellee failed to meet his burden of demon- strating that ...
... state laws have held that the State's determinations to protect health or pre- natal life are dominant and constitutionally justifiable . IX The District Court held that the ap- pellee failed to meet his burden of demon- strating that ...
Page 380
... State's interest in the health of the pregnant woman . The District Court did not reject this argument , but rather found the evidence " not . . . so convincing that it is willing to discard the Supreme Court's formulation in Roe " of a ...
... State's interest in the health of the pregnant woman . The District Court did not reject this argument , but rather found the evidence " not . . . so convincing that it is willing to discard the Supreme Court's formulation in Roe " of a ...
Page 429
... State has ad- vanced no compelling state interest to jus- tify its interference in that choice . Although Connecticut does not argue it as justification , the Court concludes that the State's interest " in protecting the poten- tial ...
... State has ad- vanced no compelling state interest to jus- tify its interference in that choice . Although Connecticut does not argue it as justification , the Court concludes that the State's interest " in protecting the poten- tial ...
Contents
Early Interpretations of Due Process | 3 |
Substantive Due Process | 19 |
18681975 | 66 |
Copyright | |
15 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion adoption appellant appellee applied argument basis benefits Boren burden Califano challenged child claim classification combat compelling conclude concurring Congress consent constitutional right constitutionally contraceptives Craig criminal decision denied disability dissenting District Court draft Due Process Clause employees Equal Protection Clause excluded exemption fact federal female fetus Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Frontiero fundamental gender gender-based governmental Griswold Hyde Amendment interest judgment JUSTICE BRENNAN JUSTICE POWELL JUSTICE REHNQUIST justify Kahn legislative legislature legitimate liberty majority male married ment mother opinion parents percent persons physician preg pregnancy prohibition purpose question reason Reed registration regulation relationship require rule scrutiny sex discrimination sexual sexual intercourse Shevin similarly situated spouses stat State's statute statutory scheme strict scrutiny substantial substantive due process supra tion tional Title VII treatment U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional unmarried unwed fathers violation widows Wiesenfeld woman women