 | 1885 - 544 pages
...Sopp, Lyman & Pusey, for appellant. Wright & Baldwin and Joy, Wright & Hudson, for appellee. SERVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record...train consisted of the engine and several freight cars. When the plaintiff found the train was about to run off, or that a portion of it was off the... | |
 | 1903 - 1112 pages
...case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The crucial question in this case is whether or not the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury of the plaintiff, so that, in the legal acceptation of that term, it contributed to her hurt. "Causo... | |
 | 1913 - 1236 pages
...afterwards performed, and the suffering occasioned thereby, then and in that case I charge you that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury, for which jihiintiff seeks to recover damages." The court refused to give these requested instructions,... | |
 | 1885 - 1062 pages
...The plaintiff appeals. Sapp, Lyman & Pmey, for appellant. Wright & Baldwin and Joy, Wright & Hiulson, for appellee. SEEVERS, J. 1. The material question...train consisted of the engine and several freight care. When the plaintiff found the train was about to run off, or that a portion of it was off the... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1885 - 732 pages
...& Pusey, for appellant. Wright & Baldwin, and Joy, Wright & Hudson,, for appellee. SEEVEES, J. — The material question presented in this record is...train consisted of the engine and several freight cars. When the plaintiff found the train was about to run off, or that a portion of it was off the... | |
 | 1898 - 1132 pages
...the question arises whether the employes of the defendant company were guilty of any negligence which was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The presumption Is that the employCs did their duty, and the plaintiff therefore Is bound by evidence to... | |
 | 1894 - 1150 pages
...from the defendant's negligent act Railroad Co. v. Salmon (Err. & App.) 39 NJ Law, 299. The question whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury was, in this case, one for the jury to determine, and an investigation of the evidence... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1887 - 1004 pages
...recover their value in this action." The court answered it as follows: " We submit to you the question whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the killing of the plaintiff's horses, or whether it was the remote cause. If it was the proximate cause... | |
 | 1887 - 972 pages
...recover their value in this action." The court answered it as follows : " We submit to you the question whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the killing of the plaintiffs horses^ or whether it was the remote cause. If it were the proximate cause... | |
| |
The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. 
