Page images
PDF
EPUB

and for the Third Judicial Department and he having filed his written request that such designation be revoked;

NOW THEREFORE In accordance with the statute in such case made and provided the designation heretofore made of date October 7 1895 of the Honorable D. CADY HERRICK to sit as Associate Justice of the Appellate Di vision of the Supreme Court in and for the Third Judicial Department is hereby and at his own request revoked; to take effect May I 1900.

GIVEN under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State at the Capitol in the city of Albany this [LS] twenty-fourth day of April in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred.

By the Governor:

WM. J. YOUNGS

THEODORE ROOSEVELT

Secretary to the Governor

DESIGNATION OF JUSTICE EDWARDS TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION

STATE OF NEW YORK

Executive Chamber

It appearing to my satisfaction that the public interest requires it;

THEREFORE In accordance with section 2 of article VI of the Constitution the

Honorable SAMUEL EDWARDS

of the city of Hudson who is a justice of the Supreme Court of the Third Judicial District is hereby designated.

as Associate Justice of the Appellate Division of the Su-
preme Court in and for the Third Judicial Department
from and after the first day of May 1900, in the place of
D. CADY HERRICK whose designation as such Associate
Justice has been revoked at his own request.

GIVEN under my hand and the Privy Seal of the
State at the Capitol in the city of Albany this
twenty-fourth day of April in the year of our
Lord nineteen hundred.

[L S]

By the Governor:

WM. J. YOUNGS

THEODORE ROOSEVELT

Secretary to the Governor

MEMORANDUM FILED WITH THE APPOINT-
MENT OF THE NEW YORK CHARTER RE-
VISION COMMISSION

STATE OF NEW YORK

Executive Chamber

Albany, April 25, 1900

Memorandum filed with the appointment of the commission to revise the charter of the city of New York, created by chapter 465 of the Laws of 1900

The act under which this commission is appointed is an Act providing for the revision of the Greater New York Charter. The law does not impose any restrictions

1

on the freedom of the Commissioners; and I desire that they exercise their judgment with entire liberty. Of course the law contemplates the revision of the existing Charter in the light of experience. It does not contemplate the framing of a new Charter. Nothing is easier than to make a city charter which is not to be enacted into law, and nothing is harder than to frame one which is to be enacted into law; that is to secure general assent to any new instrument which affects vitally important interests. In the existing charter there are many points where experience has shown amendment to be absolutely necessary; and on all such points favorable action can surely be secured. I am confident that the commission now appointed will strive to make its suggestions of such a character, and to present them in such a form, that favorable action by the Legislature may reasonably be expected to follow their deliberations. I shall venture specially to call the attention of the commission to one or two matters; notably to the question of New York water supply, in order that effectual steps may be taken to remove all danger from the Ramapo or any similar scheme to exploit the city's needs of water in the interest of a private corporation.

THEODORE ROOSEVELT

VETO OF ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1358, TO APPOINT A COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION IN THE CITY OF TROY

STATE OF NEW YORK

Executive Chamber

Albany, April 25, 1900

Memorandum filed with Assembly bill No. 1358, entitled

66

An Act to appoint a Commissioner of Education in and for the city of Troy, and to provide for the government and support of the public schools of said city" - Not approved

I withhold my signature from the Troy School bill. There are many excellent features in the proposed bill, but it is so revolutionary in its nature that I deem it inexpedient to sign it at the present time, especially in view of the fact that the present Mayor will during his term be able to change completely the personnel of the present board. With all of this legislation it must be remembered that the legislation itself, though it may be important, is less important than the administration. Whether we get good or bad government in our cities is mainly a matter of administration. Beyond question this bill has been pushed with a desire to better the conditions of the schools of Troy, and equally beyond question the desire for some such bill has arisen because of the summary dismissal of teachers for political reasons at times in the past. It is exceedingly important to get rid entirely of political considerations in dealing with the schools. By

section ten of the proposed bill, this is recognized and provided for in excellent shape, but at present it seems to me unwise to turn the schools over to a single commissioner who would change whenever a new party came into power. I think this would deprive the schools of a needed element of permanence.

THEODORE ROOSEVELT

MEMORANDUM FILED WITH APPROVED SENATE BILL NO. 1060, RELATING TO COURT ATTENDANTS IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS

STATE OF NEW YORK

Executive Chamber

Albany, April 25, 1900

Memorandum filed with Senate bill No. 1060, entitled “ An

"

Act relating to attendants upon the Supreme Court and
County Court in and for the County of Queens
Approved

This bill was passed in both branches of the Legislature and went to the mayor of the city of New York for approval. It was returned to the Executive Department not approved. This is the first instance in which a bill vetoed by the mayor has received Executive approval except where it has been re-passed by both houses of the Legislature over the mayor's veto, and it is proper that the reasons which influenced the Governor in signing this bill should be stated.

« PreviousContinue »