Sanborn, and Maxwell Evarts, for respondents.
No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to
the United States circuit court of appeals for
the Seventh circuit. Denied. See 27 C. C. A.
305, 82 Fed. 381.

GREAT SOUTHERN FIREPROOF HOTEL
CO. v. JONES et al. (February 27, 1899.) No.
711. J. K. Richards and D. F. Pugh, for peti-
tioner. J. H. Outhwaite, Talfourd P. Linn, and
George K. Nash, for respondents. No opinion.
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United
States circuit court of appeals for the Sixth_cir-
cuit. Granted. See 30 C. C. A. 108, 86 Fed.
370.

HEBBERD et al. v. BALTIMORE BUILD-
ING & LOAN ASS'N. (February 27, 1899.)
No. 694. Henry M. Russell, for petitioners.
Fielder C. Slingluff, for respondent. No opin-
ion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the
United States circuit court of appeals for the
Fourth circuit. Denied.

HILLER et al. v. LADD et al. (February
27, 1899.) No. 673. A. T. Britton, A. B.
Browne, and P. G. Galpin, for petitioners. C.
E. S. Wood, for respondents. No opinion. Pe-
tition for a writ of certiorari to the United
States circuit court of appeals for the Ninth
circuit. Denied. See 29 C. C. A. 394, 85 Fed.
703.

INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AMERICA
▼. THE PRUSSIA. (May 22, 1899.) No. 823.
Lawrence Kneeland, for petitioner. Everett P.
Wheeler, for respondent. No opinion. Peti-
tion for a writ of certiorari to the United States
circuit court of appeals for the second circuit.
Denied.

INTERLAKE TRANSP. CO. et al. v. MA-
SON et al. (February 27, 1899.) No. 693.
James H. Hoyt, for petitioners. C. E. Kremer,
for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a
writ of certiorari to the United States circuit
court of appeals for the Sixth circuit. Denied.

INTERNATIONAL BANK OF ST. LOUIS
v. FABER. (January 9, 1899.) No. 638. Rob-
ert D. Murray, for petitioner. Francis Forbes,
for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a
writ of certiorari to the United States circuit
court of appeals for the Second circuit. Denied.

JAKOBSEN v. SPRINGER et al. (May 1,
1899.) No. 795. John W. Warner, J. D.
Rouse, Wm. Grant, and John S. Blair, for pe-
titioner. Richard De Gray, for respondent. No
opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to
the United States circuit court of appeals for
the Fifth circuit. Granted, upon condition that
petitioner pay one-half of the costs of the rec-
ord and the printing thereof in No. 413, and
that this case be heard with No. 413, as one
case. See 31 C. C. A. 315, 87 Fed. 948.

KIESEL & CO. v. SUN INS. OFFICE OF
LONDON. (October 17, 1898.) No. 391. Ab-
bot R. Heywood, for petitioner. T. C. Van
Ness, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for
a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit
court of appeals for the Eighth circuit. De-
nied. See 31 C. C. A. 515, 88 Fed. 243.

KNIGHTS TEMPLARS & MASONS' LIFE
INDEMNITY CO. v. CONVERSE. (October
31, 1898.) No. 443. Charles H. Aldrich, for

MICHIGAN STOVE CO. v. FULLER-WARRÊN CO. (November 28, 1898.) No. 597. Ephraim Banning and Thomas A. Banning, for petitioner. Edward P. Vilas and Elias H. Bottum, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit. Denied. See 30 C. C. A. 193, 86 Fed. 463.

MITCHELL v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF CHICAGO. (May 15, 1899.) No. 805. Theodore M. Maltbie, for petitioner. William C. Case, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the second circuit. Granted.

MOFFETT, HODGKINS & CLARKE CO. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER et al. (February 27, 1899.) No. 720. Thomas H. Carter and Louis Marshall, for petitioner. John F. Kinney, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Second circuit. Granted.

MORRIS et al. v. STEWART et al. (November 7, 1898.) No. 463. Charles H. Aldrich, for petitioners. Samuel P. McConnell, H. M. Pollard, and Horace K. Tenney, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit. Denied. See 32 C. C. A. 7, 88 Fed. 461; 32 C. C. A. 203, 89 Fed. 290.

MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASS'N V. DU BOIS. (October 17, 1898.) No. 330. J. B. Foraker, for petitioner. R. E. McFarland, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit. Denied. See 29 C. C. A. 354, 85 Fed. 586.

OVERWEIGHT COUNTERBALANCE ELEVATOR CO. v. IMPROVED ORDER OF RED MEN'S HALL ASS'N. (May 15, 1899.) No. 706. Frederic D. McKenney and W. H. H. Hart, for petitioner. M. A. Wheaton, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit. Denied. See 94 Fed. 155.

PELZER v. HORN & BRANNEN MFG. CO. (February 27, 1899.) No. 690. Richard N. Dyer, for petitioner. Hector T. Fenton, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Third circuit. Granted.

P. LORILLARD CO. v. PEPER. (October 31, 1898.) No. 418. M. B. Philipp and Frederic D. McKenney, for petitioner. Smith P. Galt, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Eighth circuit. Denied. See 30 C. C. A. 496, 86 Fed. 956.

RHODES et al. v. MASON et al. (February 27, 1899.) No. 676. Harvey D. Goulder and F. H. Canfield, for petitioners. C. E. Kremer, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Sixth circuit. Denied.

ROBERTS v. UNITED STATES ex rel. VALENTINE. (October 17, 1898.) No. 312. The Attorney General, Henry E. Davis, and D. W. Baker, for petitioner. B. E. Valentine, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of the District of Columbia. Granted.

ROEHM v. HORST et al. (January 23, 1859.) No. 677. R. C. Dale and Samuel Dickson, for petitioner. Frank P. Prichard, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Third circuit. Granted.

RUSSELL v. STEARNS et al. (October 17, 1898.) No. 410. Henry M. Campbell, Ephraim Banning, and Thomas A. Banning, for petitioner. R. A. Parker and C. F. Burton, for respondents. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Sixth circuit. Denied. See 29 C. C. A. 121, 85 Fed. 218.

SAVILLE v. AMERICAN SUGAR-REFINING CO. (January 30, 1899.) No. 687. J. Parker Kirlin, for petitioner. Harrington Putnam, for respondent. No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Second circuit. Denied.

SAXLEHNER v. EISNER & MENDELSON CO. SAME v. SIEGEL-COOPER CO. SAME v. GIES. SAME v. MARQUET. SAME V. NIELSON. (March 6, 1899.) Nos. 712–716. Joseph H. Choate, Arthur v. Briesen, and Antonio Knauth, for petitioner. Charles G. Coe and Edmund Wetmore, for respondents. opinion. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Second circuit. Granted. See 33 C. C. A. 291, 91 Fed. 536.

No