Page images

act had no other object, and my person is of no account. I have sacrificed it, in order to place in your hands not only the honor of the army, but the imperiled honor of the nation. It appears that I was cherishing a dream in wishing to offer you all the proofs: considering you to be the sole worthy, the sole competent judge. They have begun by depriving you with the left hand of what they seemed to give you with the right. They pretended, indeed, to accept your jurisdiction, but if they had confidence in you to avenge the members of the court martial, there were still other officers who remained superior even to your jurisdiction. Let who can understand. It is absurdity doubled with hypocrisy, and it is abundantly clear that they dreaded your good sense, that they dared not run the risk of letting us tell all and of letting you judge the whole matter. They pretend that they wished to limit the scandal. What do you think of this scandal? Of my act, which consisted in bringing the matter before you, in wishing the people, incarnate in you, to be the judge They pretend also that they could not accept a revision in disguise, thus confessing that in reality they have but one dread, that of your sovereign control. The law has in you its entire representation, and it is this law of the people elect that I have wished for, this law which, as a good citizen, I hold in profound respect, and not the suspicious procedure whereby they hoped to make you a derision. I am thus excused, gentlemen, for having brought you here from your private affairs without being able to inundate you with the full flood of light of which I dreamed. The light, the whole light, this was my sole, my passionate desire! And this trial has just proved it. We have had to fight—step by step—against an extraordinarily obstinate desire for darkness. A battle has been necessary to obtain every atom of truth. Everything has been refused us. Our witnesses have been terrorized in the hope of preventing us from proving our point. And it is on your behalf alone that we have fought, that this proof might be put before you in its entirety, so that you might give your opinion without remorse in your consciences. I am certain, therefore, that you will give us credit for our efforts, and that, moreover, sufficient light has been thrown upon the affair. You have heard the witnesses; you are about to hear my counsel, who will tell you the true story: the story that maddens everybody and which no one knows. I am, therefore, at my ease. You have the truth at last, and it will do its work. M. Meline thought to dictate your decision by intrusting to you the honor of the army. And it is in the name of the honor of the army that I too appeal to your justice. I give M. Meline the most direct contradiction. Never have I insulted the army. I spoke, on the contrary, of my sympathy, my respect for the nation in arms, for our dear soldiers of France, who would rise at the first menace to defend the soil of France. And it is just as false that I attacked the chiefs, the generals who would lead them to victory. If certain persons at the War Office have compromised the army itself by their acts, is it to insult the whole army to say so? Is it not rather to act as a good citizen to separate it from all that compromises it, to give the alarm, so that the blunders which alone have been the cause of our defeat shall not occur again, and shall not lead us to fresh disaster. I am not defending myself, moreover. I leave history to judge my act, which was a necessary one; but I affirm that the army is dishonored when gendarmes are allowed to embrace Major Esterhazy after the abominable letters written by him. I affirm that that valiant army is insulted daily by the bandits who, on the plea of defending it, sully it by their degrading championship, who trail in the mud all that France still honors as good and great. I affirm that those who dishonor that great national army are those who mingle cries of “Vive l'armeel" with those of “A bas les juifs!” and “Vive Esterhazy!” Grand Dieu ! the people of St. Louis, of Bayard, of Condé, and of Hoche: the people which counts a hundred great victories, the people of the great wars of the Republic and the Empire, the people whose power, grace, and generosity have dazzled the world, crying “Vive Esterhazy!” It is a shame the stain of which our efforts on behalf of truth and justice can alone wash off! - You know the legend which has grown up: Dreyfus was

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

condemned justly and legally by seven infallible officers,
whom it is impossible even to suspect of a blunder without
insulting the whole army. Dreyfus expiates in merited
torments his abominable crime. And, as he is a Jew, a
Jewish syndicate is formed, an international sans patric
syndicate, disposing of hundreds of millions, the object of
which is to save the traitor at any price, even by the most
shameless intrigues. And thereupon this syndicate began
to heap crime on crime: buying consciences, casting
France into a disastrous agitation, resolved on selling her
to the enemy, willing even to drive all Europe into a
general war rather than renounce its terrible plan.
It is very simple, nay childish, if not imbecile. But it is
with this poisoned bread that the unclean Press has been
nourishing our poor people now for some months. And
it is not surprising if we are witnessing a dangerous crisis;
for when folly and lies are thus sown broadcast, you neces-
sarily reap insanity.
Gentlemen, I would not insult you by supposing that
you have yourselves been duped by this nursery tale. I
know you; I know who you are. You are the heart and
the reason of Paris, of my great Paris: where I was born,
which I love with an infinite tenderness, which I have been
studying and writing of now for forty years. And I know
likewise what is now passing in your brains; for, before
coming to sit here as defendant, I sat there on the bench
where you are now. You represent there the average
opinion; you try to illustrate prudence and justice in the
mass. Soon I shall be in thought with you in the room
where you deliberate, and I am convinced that your effort
will be to safeguard your interests as citizens, which are,
of course, the interests of the whole nation. You may
make a mistake, but you will do so in the thought that
while securing your own weal you are securing the weal
of all.
I see you at your homes at evening under the lamp; I
hear you talk with your friends; I accompany you into
your factories and shops. You are all workers—some
tradesmen, others manufacturers, some exercising liberal
professions. And your very legitimate anxiety is the de-
plorable state into which business has fallen. Everywhere
the present crisis threatens to become a disaster. The


receipts fall off; transactions become more and more difficult. So that the idea which you have brought here, the thought which I read in your countenances, is that there has been enough of this and that it must be ended. You have not gone the length of saying, like many: “What matters it that an innocent man is at the Ile du Diable? Is the interest of a single man worth this disturbing a great country?” But you say, nevertheless, that the agitation which we are raising, we who hunger for truth and justice, costs too dear! And if you condemn me, gentlemen, it is that thought which will be at the bottom of your verdict. You desire tranquillity for your homes, you wish for the revival of business, and you may think that by punishing me you will stop a campaign which is injurious to the interests of France. Well, gentlemen, if that is your idea, you are entirely mistaken. Do me the honor of believing that I am not defending my liberty. By punishing me you would only magnify me. Whoever suffers for truth and justice becomes august and sacred. Look at me. Have I the look of a hireling, of a liar, and a traitor? Why should I be playing a part? I have behind me neither political ambition nor sectarian passion. I am a free writer, who has given his life to labor; who to-morrow will reenter the ranks and resume his suspended task. And how stupid are those who call me an Italian;–me, born of a French mother, brought up by grandparents in the Beauce, peasants of that vigorous soil; me, who lost my father at seven years of age, who did not go to Italy till I was fifty-four. And yet, I am proud that my father was from Venice,— the resplendent city whose ancient glory sings in all memories. And even if I were not French, would not the forty volumes in the French language, which I have sent by millions of copies throughout the world, suffice to make me a Frenchman? So I do not defend myself. But what a blunder would be yours if you were convinced that by striking me you would reestablish order in our unfortunate country! Do you not understand now that what the nation is dying of is the obscurity in which there is such an obstinate determination to leave it? The blunders of those in authority are being heaped upon those of others; one lie necessitates

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

another, so that the mass is becoming formidable. A
judicial blunder was committed, and then to hide it a fresh
crime against good sense and equity has had daily to be
committed | The condemnation of an innocent man has
involved the acquittal of a guilty man, and now to-day you
are asked in turn to condemn me because I gave utterance
to my pain on beholding our country embarked on this
terrible course. Condemn me, then | But it will be one
more fault added to the others—a fault the burden of
which you will bear in history. And my condemnation,
instead of restoring the peace for which you long, and
which we all of us desire, will be only a fresh seed of
passion and disorder. The cup, I tell you, is full; do not
make it run over!
Why do you not exactly estimate the terrible crisis
through which the country is passing? They say that we
are the authors of the scandal, that it is lovers of truth
and justice who are leading the nation astray, and urging
it to riot. Really this is a mockery! To speak only of
General Billot—was he not warned eighteen months ago?
Did not Colonel Picquart insist that he should take in
hand the matter of revision, if he did not wish the storm
to burst and overturn everything? Did not M. Scheurer-
Kestner, with tears in his eyes, beg him to think of France,
and save her from such a catastrophe 2 No! our desire
has been to facilitate everything, to allay everything: and
if the country is now in trouble, the responsibility lies with
the power, which, to cover the guilty, and in the further-
ance of political interests, has denied everything, hoping
to be strong enough, to prevent the truth from being shed.
It has manoeuvred in behalf of darkness, and it alone is
responsible for the present distraction of consciences
The Dreyfus case ! ah, gentlemen, that has now become
a very small affair. It is lost and far-away in view of the
terrifying questions to which it has given rise. There is
no longer any Dreyfus case. The question now is whether
France is still the France of the rights of man, the France
that gave freedom to the world, and that ought to give it
justice. Are we still the most noble, the most fraternal,
the most generous nation? Shall we preserve our repu-
tation in Europe for equity and humanity? Are not all
the victories that we have won called in question? Open

« PreviousContinue »