Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States, Volume 243

Front Cover

From inside the book

Contents

Carbon Black from and to Points in United States 226 I C C
52
Miller Lux Inc v Southern Pac Co 41 I C C 617 671
66
Olean Glass Co v Pennsylvania R Co 213 I C C 229
113
Petroleum Rail Shippers Assn v Alton S R 589
115
Carbon Limestone Co v Pennsylvania R Co 173 I C C 167 400
153
Potatoes from Ontonagon Mich to Chicago
161
and supplemental reports 47
165
Morrell Co v New York Central R Co 104 I C C 104_ 536
172
Hauser Packing Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 200 I C C
189
Cement to New England Territory 209 I C C 682 68 249
209
MountainPacific Oil Cases 192 I C C 599 195 I C C
212
Auburn Mills v Chicago A R Co 216 I C C 1
216
Charlottesville Woolen Mills v Chesapeake O Ry Co
222
Proposed Modification ofRules Standards and Instructions
233
Chrysler Corp v New York Central R Co 234 I C C 755 279
234
Chicago A R Co Auburn Mills et al
235
Abrasive Co v Erie R Co 182 I C C 715 388
239
Cincinnati L E R Co 229 I C C 187 232 I C C 267 439
241
National Slag Co v Atlantic City R Co 181 I C C 699
248
Belt R Stock Yards Co v Alton R Co 225 I C C 649
254
Standard Oil Co of Louisiana v Aberdeen R R Co 237
261
Bisbee Linseed Co v Baltimore O R Co 215 I C C 250
270
American Chain Co v Baltimore O R Co 181 I C C 657 357
283
Hooven Allison Co v Baltimore O R Co 225 I C C 456
284
Coal to Alabama Points 235 I C C 385 798
297
Pulp Woodfrom Fernandina Fla to Orange Tex 473
299
Chicago B Q R Co Hood River Canning Co of Illinois v 549
309
Rate Structure InvestigationPart 7 83
310
Nebraska State Ry Comm v Union Pac R Co 232 I C C
321
American Glue Co v Boston M R 191 I C C 37
336
Bituminous Coal Rates to the Southeast 37 I C C 652_ _ _ _ 735
358
Newsprint Paper Investigation 197 I C C 738
360
Anderson Bros Foster v Alabama Central R Co 206
363
Pacific Coast Fourth Section Applications 165 I C C 373
373
Hosiery from Southern Points 156 I C C 117
374
Switching Rates in Chicago Switching District 177 I C C
461
Fertilizer in Central Territory 237 I C C 399
472
Coast Packing Co v Gilmore P R Co 218 I C C 507
507
Transit Commodity Rates in the South
522
HymanMichaels Co v Georgia F R 192 I C C 106
536
Transit Stations Minimum Weights on Beans 167
511
Coffee Roasted in the Southeast 225 I C C 271___
570
Pacific Lbr Co v Northwestern Pac R Co 51 I C C 738
639
Paine Bros Co v Lehigh Valley R Co 7 I C C 218
670
Vegetables from the South to New England
676
Fifteen Percent Case 19371938 226 I C C 41 52 367 377 611
691
Arkell Smiths v Alton S R 234 I C C 447
695
Chicago Belt Ry Co South Chicago Coal Dock Co v 23
700
Mathieson Alkali Works v Louisville N R Co 153 I C C
709
CokeBetween Points in Central and Illinois Territories 194
724
VirginiaCarolina Chemical Corp v Louisville N R Co 469
746
Petroleum and Its Products 171 I C C 286 434 608
750
Chicago Short Line Ry Co South Chicago Coal Dock Co v 23
758
Cancellation of Rates on Lumber to Texas 167 I C C 561 20
773
Armour Co v Akron C Y Ry Co 232 I C C 471 40
778
Firestone Tire Rubber Co v Akron C Y Ry Co 177
779
Coal to Alcoa Knoxville and Maryville Tenn
782
Meats and Packing House Products 136 I C C 651
792
Michigan Paper Mills Traffic Assn v Atchison T S F
799
Cases reported in Motor Carrier Cases under part II of
801
Table of localities_
809
Index digest
823
Waterloo Fruit Comm Co v Illinois Central R Co 271
830
Canned Goodsfrom Pacific Coast 188 I C C 687 553
831
Great Lakes Coal Coke Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co
836
Traffic Bureau Davenport Chamber of Commerce v Alton
837
Asphalt toCincinnati Ohio 237 I C C 309_ 15
847
Wood Pulpfrom Fernandina Fla to Orange Tex 473
853
Pooling Passenger Train Revenues and Service 194 I C C
859
St LouisS F Ry Co Alabama Mining Institute v 43
872

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 211 - It shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this part to make, give, or cause any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, association, locality, port, port district, gateway, transit point, region, district, territory, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 100 - State authorities in the enforcement of any provision of this act. "(4) whenever in any such Investigation the commission, after full hearing, finds that any such rate, fare, charge, classification, regulation, or practice causes any undue or unreasonable advantage, preference. or prejudice as between persons or localities In intrastate commerce on the one hand and Interstate or foreign commerce...
Page 211 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this Act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 211 - Every common carrier subject to the provisions of this act shall, according to their respective powers, afford all reasonable, proper, and equal facilities for the interchange of traffic between their respective lines, and for the receiving, forwarding and delivering of passengers and property to and from their several lines and those connecting therewith, and shall not discriminate in their rates and charges between such connecting lines...
Page 211 - ... and shall not discriminate in their rates, fares, and charges between connecting lines, or unduly prejudice any connecting line in the distribution of traffic that is not specifically routed by the shipper. As used in this paragraph the term "connecting line...
Page 168 - Said commission may, from time to time, make or amend such general rules or orders as may be requisite for the order and regulation of proceedings before it, including forms of notices and the service thereof, which shall conform, as nearly as may be, to those in use in the courts of the United States.
Page 577 - As we have shown in the recent case of Wight v. United States, 167 US 512, the purpose of the second section is to enforce equality between shippers over the same line, and to prohibit any rebate or other device by which two shippers, shipping over the same line, the same distance, under the same circumstances of carriage, are compelled to pay different prices therefor ; and we there held that the phrase " under substantially similar circumstances and conditions...
Page 385 - ... undue or unreasonable advantage, preference, or prejudice as between persons or localities in intrastate commerce, on the one hand, and interstate or foreign commerce, on the other hand, or any undue, unreasonable, or unjust discrimination against interstate or foreign commerce; and...
Page 681 - In the exercise of its power to prescribe just and reasonable rates the Commission shall give due consideration, among other factors, to the effect of rates on the movement of traffic by the carrier or carriers for which the rates are prescribed...
Page 681 - Their meaning, supported also by the legislative history, seems to be that no carrier should be required to maintain rates which would be unreasonable, judged by other standards, for the purpose of protecting the traffic of a...

Bibliographic information