Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution
Oxford University Press, 1998 M02 26 - 336 pages
Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution challenges the prevailing account of the Supreme Court of the New Deal era, which holds that in the spring of 1937 the Court suddenly abandoned jurisprudential positions it had staked out in such areas as substantive due process and commerce clause doctrine. In this view, the impetus for such a dramatic reversal was provided by external political pressures manifested in FDR's landslide victory in the 1936 election, and by the subsequent Court-packing crisis. Author Barry Cushman, by contrast, discounts the role that political pressure played in securing this "constitutional revolution." Instead, he reorients study of the New Deal Court by focusing attention on the internal dynamics of doctrinal development and the role of New Dealers in seizing opportunities presented by doctrinal change. Recasting this central story in American constitutional development as a chapter in the history of ideas rather than simply an episode in the history of politics, Cushman offers a thoroughly researched and carefully argued study that recharacterizes the mechanics by which laissez-faire constitutionalism unraveled and finally collapsed during FDR's reign. Identifying previously unseen connections between various lines of doctrine, Cushman charts the manner in which Nebbia v. New York's abandonment of the distinction between public and private enterprise hastened the demise of the doctrinal structure in which that distinction had played a central role.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
activities Adkins affected Amendment American appeared application argued argument association authority Back bill Board Brandeis Brief business affected charged Charles Chief Justice citing Coal commerce clause concerned Cong Congress constitutional constitutionality continued contract current of commerce Deal decided decision dissent distinction doctrine due process economic employees engaged exercise fact federal flow held House Hughes industry interstate commerce involved issue Jackson joined Jones judicial Justice labor Lawyers legislation liberty limit majority manufacturing means minimum wage Nebbia necessary NLRB noted opinion organization Parrish police power political presented principle production protection provisions public interest question Railroad reason regulation relation remarks Roberts Roosevelt Schechter Security Senate statute Stone strike suggested Supreme Court thought tion union United upheld vote Wagner Act workers wrote York