Report of the State Civil Service Commission, Volume 29, Part 1The Commission, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 51
Page 68
... 25 , 1907 June 1 , 1908 Nov. 8 , 1908 May 1 , 1908 July 10 , 1911 April 3 , 1902 June 21 , 1907 Jan. 14 , 1908 Oct. 1 , 1910 Jan. 13 , 1908 Oct. 1 , 1911 $ 2,250 00 2,250 00 $ 5 per day . $ 900 00 720 00 600 00 Aug. 1 , 1911 Aug. 1 ...
... 25 , 1907 June 1 , 1908 Nov. 8 , 1908 May 1 , 1908 July 10 , 1911 April 3 , 1902 June 21 , 1907 Jan. 14 , 1908 Oct. 1 , 1910 Jan. 13 , 1908 Oct. 1 , 1911 $ 2,250 00 2,250 00 $ 5 per day . $ 900 00 720 00 600 00 Aug. 1 , 1911 Aug. 1 ...
Page 71
... 25 , 1909 Feb. 25 , 1909 900 00 Blanche R. Heflich July 12 , 1909 July 12 , 1909 900 00 Katherine V. Kelley Feb. 1 ... per day . Elias Stiller . 3 per day . 3 per day . May 15 , 1911 May 15 , 1911 3 per day . Process server . Law clerk ...
... 25 , 1909 Feb. 25 , 1909 900 00 Blanche R. Heflich July 12 , 1909 July 12 , 1909 900 00 Katherine V. Kelley Feb. 1 ... per day . Elias Stiller . 3 per day . 3 per day . May 15 , 1911 May 15 , 1911 3 per day . Process server . Law clerk ...
Page 72
... per day . George W. Egbert . Aug. 31 , 1910 Aug. 31 , 1910 Examiner . Examiner . E. T. Eshelman . Oct. 11 , 1909 Oct. 11 , 1909 10 per ... 25 , 1907 Oct. 1 , 1907 1,200 00 Stenographer . Mary H. Shields .. Feb. 1 , 1906 Oct. 21 , 1907 ...
... per day . George W. Egbert . Aug. 31 , 1910 Aug. 31 , 1910 Examiner . Examiner . E. T. Eshelman . Oct. 11 , 1909 Oct. 11 , 1909 10 per ... 25 , 1907 Oct. 1 , 1907 1,200 00 Stenographer . Mary H. Shields .. Feb. 1 , 1906 Oct. 21 , 1907 ...
Page 79
... per day . Jan. 1 , 1909 Jan. 1 , 1909 9 per day . Mar. 15 , 1909 Mar. 15 , 1909 9 per day . May 1 , 1900 May 1 ... 25 , 1909 Oct. 25 , 1909 1,500 00 POSITION COMPTROLLER ( continued ) — Name Date of entrance. CLASSIFIED CIVIL LIST STATE ...
... per day . Jan. 1 , 1909 Jan. 1 , 1909 9 per day . Mar. 15 , 1909 Mar. 15 , 1909 9 per day . May 1 , 1900 May 1 ... 25 , 1909 Oct. 25 , 1909 1,500 00 POSITION COMPTROLLER ( continued ) — Name Date of entrance. CLASSIFIED CIVIL LIST STATE ...
Page 80
... 25 , 1908 Archibald C. Calhoun John J. Magilton . Jan. 1 , 1908 Nov. 1 , 1910 July 11 , 1910 Jan. 1 , 1908 Nov. 1 , 1910 July 11 , 1910 $ 2,700 00 1,500 00 1,500 00 1,200 00 $ 10 per day . 9 per day . 9 per day . 12 per day . 12 per day ...
... 25 , 1908 Archibald C. Calhoun John J. Magilton . Jan. 1 , 1908 Nov. 1 , 1910 July 11 , 1910 Jan. 1 , 1908 Nov. 1 , 1910 July 11 , 1910 $ 2,700 00 1,500 00 1,500 00 1,200 00 $ 10 per day . 9 per day . 9 per day . 12 per day . 12 per day ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
00 Agent 00 April 00 Assistant 00 Charles 00 Clerk 00 COMPETITIVE CLASS 00 Edward 00 EXEMPT CLASS 00 George 00 Guard 00 James 00 John 00 Joseph 00 July 00 June 00 POSITION 00 Sept 00 Teacher 00 Thomas 00 William 25 per day 50 per day 900 00 Stenographer April 15 April 20 assistant district attorney Assistant engineer Assistant matron Axeman cents per folio Charles H Chief clerk civil service Date Clerk to Justice COMPETITIVE CLASS continued Confidential clerk County clerk Court Date of entrance Deputy Deputy Deputy Draughtsman Engineering draughtsman entrance into civil entrance into present Fred Game protector George W Highway inspector Inspector of masonry John H July 15 June 15 June 20 Junior assistant Keeper Name Date present position Compensation Process server Recording clerk Rodman Secretary Smith Special deputy clerk Supervisor UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE William H
Popular passages
Page 27 - If the position is clearly one properly subject to competitive examination, the commissioners may be compelled to so classify it. On the other hand, if the position be by statute or from its nature exempt from examination, and the action of the commission be palpably illegal, the commission may be compelled to strike the position from the competitive or examination class, though in such case redress by mandamus would often be unnecessary, as a valid appointment could be made notwithstanding the classification....
Page 42 - He shall likewise notify any candidate who, though admitted to the examination, has been rejected for reasons other than failure to receive the required minimum, stating such reasons specifically.
Page 27 - The result of this conclusion in the Schau case is that the action of the civil service commissioners, in making classifications, is subject to a judicial control that is limited to such questions as may properly be reviewed in proceedings instituted by writ of mandamus.
Page 27 - Sims case and after mature deliberation we decided to retract our earlier views and held that the determination of a Civil Service Commission in classifying positions in the public service, although involving the exercise of judgment and discretion, is more of a legislative or executive character than judicial or quasi-judicial.
Page 23 - ... Service Law requiring appointments to positions in the State Service, the duties of which are confined to a locality outside of Albany county, to be made, so far as practicable, from residents of the judicial district...
Page 23 - ... certifications shall be made of names of residents of the first and second judicial districts for vacancies in state departments or institutions with offices in the borough of Manhattan, New York City.
Page 23 - ... shall be made from the residents of the judicial district in which the vacancy exists except that from the eligible lists of clerks, junior clerks, bookkeepers, stenographers, pages, messengers, inspectors of masonry, watchmen, telephone operators...
Page 25 - Com mission to rescind its resolution changing the classification of the position of transfer tax appraiser from the competitive to the exempt class.
Page 27 - ... other cases involving judicial functions. This was in 1903. Three years of experience under that decision demonstrated that this court had in effect assumed the functions of the Civil Service Commissioners, for every challenged decision of these officers was brought to this court as a question of law. The case of People ex rel. Schau v. McWilliams (185 NY 92), which came to us in 1906, very pointedly presented the unfortunate tendencies of our decision in the Sims case and after mature deliberation...
Page 37 - A uniform system of estimating and recording the relative efficiency of employees could then be adopted and more effectively applied for all bureaus and offices in all departments. This can best be accomplished by the aid of an independent commission or body, such as the Civil Service Commission. To secure uniform methods of procedure and results in all bureaus and departments, it would be well for the commission to prescribe the necessary forms for recording efficiency ratings and to have some part...