Selected Cases and Case Studies in Transportation Regulation and ManagementW.C. Brown Company, 1963 - 268 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 43
Page 44
... served directly by it was erroneous . 8. The fact that the Oregon - Washington Railroad & Navigation Company held a certificate to build the line gave rise to an implied agreement to serve the dis- trict and therefore discouraged other ...
... served directly by it was erroneous . 8. The fact that the Oregon - Washington Railroad & Navigation Company held a certificate to build the line gave rise to an implied agreement to serve the dis- trict and therefore discouraged other ...
Page 46
... serve all of the public , including group one carriers , if they desired to continue to serve the public as common carriers . B. Group Two Carriers & Interveners 1. Their inability to serve joint - line movements of freight was caused ...
... serve all of the public , including group one carriers , if they desired to continue to serve the public as common carriers . B. Group Two Carriers & Interveners 1. Their inability to serve joint - line movements of freight was caused ...
Page 94
... serving many of the port cities that were involved in the application but did not serve Crescent City . 9. The railroads maintained that they were able and willing to carry all the traffic moving between the cities considered in the ...
... serving many of the port cities that were involved in the application but did not serve Crescent City . 9. The railroads maintained that they were able and willing to carry all the traffic moving between the cities considered in the ...
Contents
CHAPTER PAGE 1 Constitutional Basis for Regulation 3 22 | 3 |
Intrastate v Interstate Commerce | 15 |
Types of Carriers | 25 |
Copyright | |
22 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agent agreed airport amount applicable Arguments in Favor beneficial owner bill of lading carload shipments carriage carrier or party carriers of property cars cents Charles River Bridge Chicago claim classification coal company's consignee consignor contract carrier Court The Supreme decision delivering carrier delivery destination District Court equipment Explain express company F T F filed forwarded freight charges held Illinois Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission intrastate joint rates judgment liable live stock loss or damage Louis-San Francisco Railway lower court lumber Madisonville ment Mills Missouri Pacific Railroad motor carrier motor common carriers moved negligence operations paid pany payment pounds prepaid Questions for Discussion rail Railway Company received refused regulate respect routes and joint sales manager statute Suffern Supreme Court tariff terminal terms and conditions Texarkana tion traffic manager trailer transit privilege truck uniform bill United vessels warehouse weighing scales weight York