By the sundry civil act-Continued.
For construction of a light-vessel for use off the
mouth of the Columbia River, Oregon, within
the limit of cost of $130,000, in addition to
the appropriation of $50,000 therefor, a con-
tract is authorized for (p. 298)...
For constructing a light and fog-signal station at
Hinchinbrook entrance, Prince William Sound,
Alaska, within the limit of cost of $125,000, in
addition to the appropriation of $25,000 there-
for, a contract is authorized for (p. 298)..
For the construction of new buildings to replace
the main building of the Reform School, Dis-
trict of Columbia, within the limit of cost of
$100,000, in addition to the appropriation of
$50,000 therefor, a contract is authorized for
(p. 338)...
For constructing a light vessel to be placed near the entrance to Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, within the limit of cost of $115,000, in addition to the appropriation of $50,000 therefor, a contract is authorized for (p. 381)
For constructing a light and fog signal at Miah Maul Shoal, Delaware River, within the limit of cost of $75,000, in addition to the appropriation of $40,000 therefor, a contract is authorized for (p. 381)
For constructing a light and fog signal station on the Joe Flogger Shoal, Delaware River, within the limit of cost of $75,000, in addition to the appropriation of $40,000 therefor, a contract is authorized for (p. 381)..
For constructing a light and fog signal station at
Ragged Point, Potomac River, within the limit
of cost of $30,000, in addition to the appropria-
tion of $15,000 therefor, a contract is authorized
for (p. 381).
For constructing a light vessel, to be placed off
Martins Reef, northwest end of Lake Huron,
Michigan, within the limit of cost of $45,000, in
addition to the appropriation of $25,000 therefor,
a contract is authorized for (p. 381).
For constructing a light and fog signal station
near Point Cabrillo, California, within the limit
of cost of $50,000, in addition to the appropria-
tion of $25,000 therefor, a contract is authorized
for (p. 381)
For constructing a new tender for inspection
service in the thirteenth light-house district,
within the limit of cost of $110,000 in addition
to the appropriation of $35,000 therefor, a con-
tract is authorized for (p. 382).
![[blocks in formation]](https://books.google.com.bd/books/content?id=wkdZAAAAIAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA768&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=Reservation&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U2lbv1sONOFfeR6yfdUswFmlFF3Tw&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=615,216,267,1149)
By the urgent deficiency act:
The limit of cost of the heating, lighting, and power plant authorized and provided for under the sundry civil act approved April 28, 1904, is extended from $757,800 to $1,393,000, so that when said plant shall have been completed it will be of sufficient size and capacity to furnish heat, light, and power for the office building, House of Representatives, the Capitol building, the Congressional Library building, the office building, United States Senate, and for such other buildings as may hereafter be erected on grounds adjacent to the Capitol grounds at the east of the Capitol building and facing the same, and contracts are authorized to be entered into for said difference in limit of cost (p. 402). For the construction of a subway system to connect the office building of the United States Senate with the Capitol building, within the limit of cost of $168,500, contracts are authorized for (p. 402)
By the act to increase the limit of cost of certain public
buildings, etc.:
In addition to the respective appropriations there-
for in the act making appropriations for certain
public buildings, pp. 438 to 445, inclusive, con-
tracts are authorized as follows:
Under the provisions and limitations of sec-
tion 1 of said act--
For post-office and court-house at Selma,
Ala.; contract authorized for (p. 421).
For post-office and court-house at Colorado
Springs, Colo.; contract authorized for
(p. 421)
For post-office at Meriden, Conn.; contract
authorized for (p. 421).
For post-office and land office at Gaines-
ville, Fla.; contract authorized for (p.
421)...
For post-office at Decatur, Ill.; contract
authorized for (p. 421)
For post-office at Flint, Mich.; contract
authorized for (p. 421) ..
For post-office at Owosso, Mich.; contract
authorized for (p. 422)
For post-office, court-house, and custom-
house at St. Paul, Minn.; limit of
cost, $150,000; appropriation, $50,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 422, 438). .
For post-office at Nevada, Mo.; contract
authorized for (p. 422)
For post-office at Reno, Nev.; contract au-
thorized for (p. 422)
For post-office at Elizabeth, N. J.; contract
For post-office at Ithaca, N. Y.; contract
By the act to increase the limit of cost of certain public
buildings, etc.-Continued.
In addition to the respective appropriations there-
for, etc.-Continued.
Under the provisions and limitations of sec-
tion 1 of said act-Continued.
For post-office at Kingston, N. Y.; con-
tract authorized for (p. 422)
For post-office at Little Falls, N. Y.; con-
tract authorized for (p. 422)
For post-office at Rochester, N. Y.; limit
of cost, $60,000; appropriation, $30,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 422, 438)..
For post-office at Saratoga Springs, N. Y.;
contract authorized for (p. 422).
For post-office at Warren, Ohio; contract
authorized for (p. 422) -
For post-office and court-house at Ogden,
Utah; contract authorized for (p. 422)..
For post-office, court-house, and custom-
house at Spokane, Wash.; contract au-
thorized for (p. 422) .
For post-office, court-house, and custom-
house at Takoma, Wash.; contract author-
ized for (p. 422)
For post-office and court-house at Eau
Claire, Wis.; contract authorized for (p.
422)
For post-office and court-house at Green Bay,
Wis.; contract authorized for (p. 422)
For post-office and land office at Wausau,
Wis.; limit of cost, $30,000; appropria-
tion, $20,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 438)
Under the provisions and limitations of section
2 of said act:
For post-office and court-house at Council
Bluffs, Iowa; limit of cost, $75,000; ap-
propriation, $30,000; contract authorized
for (pp. 423, 438)..
For assay office at New York, N. Y.; limit
of cost, $350,000; appropriation, $20,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 423, 438).
For post-office at Ottumwa, Iowa; limit of
cost, $35,000; appropriation, $20,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 423, 438) -
For post-office and court-house at Wichita,
Kans.; limit of cost, $50,000; appropria-
tion, $15,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423,438)...
For post-office and court-house at Detroit,
Mich.; limit of cost, $325,000; appropria-
tion, $75,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 438)
For post-office and court-house at Jackson,
Miss.; limit of cost, $40,000; appropria-
tion, $30,000; contract authorized for (pp.
423, 438)...
30, 000. 00 35,000.00
30,000.00
By the act to increase the limit of cost of certain public
buildings, etc.-Continued.
In addition to the respective appropriations there-
for, etc.-Continued.
Under the provisions and limitations of sec-
tion 2 of said act-Continued.
For post-office and court-house at Trenton,
N.J.; limit of cost, $125,000; appropria-
tion, $20,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 439)
For post-office and court-house at Asheville,
N. C.; limit of cost, $50,000; appropria-
tion, $20,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 439) - -
For post-office and court-house at Colum-
bus, Ohio; limit of cost, $400,000; appro-
priation, $40,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 439)
For post-office at Youngstown, Ohio; limit
of cost, $100,000; appropriation, $40,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 423, 439)..
For post-office and court-house at Chatta-
nooga, Tenn.; limit of cost, $110,000;
appropriation, $15,000; contract author-
ized for (pp. 423, 439).
For post-office and court-house at Fort
Worth, Tex.; limit of cost, $150,000;
appropriation, $30,000; contract author-
ized for (pp. 423, 439).
For post-office and court-house at San An-
tonio, Tex.; limit of cost, $45,000; appro-
priation, $20,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 439)
For post-office and court-house at Tyler,
Tex.; limit of cost, $40,000; appropria-
tion, $20,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 439)
For post-office and custom-house at Peters-
burg, Va.; limit of cost, $50,000; appro-
priation, $25,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 439)
For post-office and court-house at Lynch-
burg, Va.; limit of cost, $80,000; appro-
priation, $20,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 423, 439)
For post-office at Sheboygan, Wis.; limit of
cost, $30,000; appropriation, $20,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439).
Under the provisions and limitations of sec-
tion 3 of said act as follows:
For subtreasury and other governmental
offices at San Francisco, Cal.; limit of
cost, $375,000; appropriation, $200,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439)
For post-office and court-house at Peoria,
III.; limit of cost, $200,000; appropria-
tion, $40,000; contract authorized for
(pp. 424, 439)..
![[blocks in formation]](https://books.google.com.bd/books/content?id=wkdZAAAAIAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA771&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=Reservation&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U1nJlZzdCE0uwCX3XiuoCMEj1xnQg&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=615,271,128,1072)
By the act to increase the limit of cost of certain public
buildings, etc.-Continued.
In addition to the respective appropriations there-
for, etc. Continued.
Under the provisions and limitations of sec-
tion 3 of said act as follows-Continued.
For post-office at Rockford, Ill.; limit of
cost, $25,000; appropriation, $10,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439).
For post-office at South Bend, Ind.; limit
of cost, $100,000; appropriation, $40,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439) -
For post-office at Lafayette, Ind.; limit of
cost, $60,000; appropriation, $15,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439).
For post-office and court-house at Cedar
Rapids, Iowa; limit of cost, $200,000;
appropriation, $60,000; contract author-
ized for (pp. 424, 439) .
For post-office and custom-house at Spring-
field, Mass.; limit of cost, $90,000; appro-
priation, $45,000; contract authorized
for (pp. 424, 439)..
For post-office, court-house, and custom-
house at Duluth, Minn.; limit of cost,
$125,000; appropriation, $20,000; con-
tract authorized for (pp. 424, 439)
For post-office at Springfield, Ohio; limit
of cost, $30,000; appropriation, $20,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439) -
For post-office at Lancaster, Pa.; limit
of cost, $75,000; appropriation, $20,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439). .
For post-office and court-house at Knox-
ville, Tenn.; limit of cost, $155,000;
appropriation, $20,000; contract author-
ized for (pp. 424, 439)
For post-office at Roanoke, Va.; limit of
cost, $75,000; appropriation, $30,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439)...
For post-office and court-house at Green-
ville, S. C.; limit of cost, $80,000; ap-
propriation, $50,000; contract author-
ized for (pp. 424, 439, 442)
Under the provisions and limitations of sec-
tion 4, of said act:
For post-office at St. Louis, Mo.; limit of
cost, $400,000; appropriation, $200,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 424, 439)...
Under the provisions and limitations of sec-
tion 6 of said act:
For post-office at Bessemer, Ala.; limit of
cost, $60,000; appropriation, $25,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 425, 440)...
For post-office at Florence, Ala.; limit of
cost, $50,000; appropriation, $25,000;
contract authorized for (pp. 425, 440)..
For post-office and court-house at Tusca-
loosa, Ala.; limit of cost, $150,000; ap-
propriation, $30,000; contract authorized
for (pp. 425, 440)..
|