Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 57
Page 102
... candidates whom they would accept immediately . We find ( as did Caplow and McGee , 1958 ) that a majority of the candidates had close relationships with the school before the search started . This connection being of increasing import ...
... candidates whom they would accept immediately . We find ( as did Caplow and McGee , 1958 ) that a majority of the candidates had close relationships with the school before the search started . This connection being of increasing import ...
Page 103
... candidate will be activated if one can answer " yes - yes - no " on the three questions we are wrong only in 7 out of 75 cases ( Table 6.0 ) . Four candidates should have been activated following the model but were not . They were all ...
... candidate will be activated if one can answer " yes - yes - no " on the three questions we are wrong only in 7 out of 75 cases ( Table 6.0 ) . Four candidates should have been activated following the model but were not . They were all ...
Page 104
... candidates related to the committee member's knowledge about them as persons The committee members knowledge about the candidates as persons Two or more know the candidate as a person Less than two know the candidate as a person Candidates ...
... candidates related to the committee member's knowledge about them as persons The committee members knowledge about the candidates as persons Two or more know the candidate as a person Less than two know the candidate as a person Candidates ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote