Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 14
Page 295
... completely with the statement . 38.2 % agreed partly . 39.0 % disagreed completely . 3.3 % did not have any opinion or did not answer , and 2.1 % gave other answers . ( N = 751 ) . ( b ) On the question : What would your attitude be ...
... completely with the statement . 38.2 % agreed partly . 39.0 % disagreed completely . 3.3 % did not have any opinion or did not answer , and 2.1 % gave other answers . ( N = 751 ) . ( b ) On the question : What would your attitude be ...
Page 297
... completely 21.5 18.4 14.9 De a Istan EL : other as one Agree partly Disagree completely Total ( N ) 37.7 38.4 47.8 40.8 43.2 37.3 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % ( 191 ) ( 359 ) ( 161 ) gamma - coefficient : 0.01 ion s ( b ) Attitudes towards ...
... completely 21.5 18.4 14.9 De a Istan EL : other as one Agree partly Disagree completely Total ( N ) 37.7 38.4 47.8 40.8 43.2 37.3 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % ( 191 ) ( 359 ) ( 161 ) gamma - coefficient : 0.01 ion s ( b ) Attitudes towards ...
Page 307
... completely that the chairman should be given all formal authority , 42 % agree partly and 38 % disagree completely , as against 16 % , 34 % , and 50 % of those unsatisfied . Of those satisfied with own influence 50 % agree completely ...
... completely that the chairman should be given all formal authority , 42 % agree partly and 38 % disagree completely , as against 16 % , 34 % , and 50 % of those unsatisfied . Of those satisfied with own influence 50 % agree completely ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote