Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 58
Page 26
... garbage can model of organizational choice . 2.1 Garbage Can Decision Processes Suppose we view a choice opportunity as a garbage can into which . various problems and solutions are dumpted by participants . The mix of garbage in a ...
... garbage can model of organizational choice . 2.1 Garbage Can Decision Processes Suppose we view a choice opportunity as a garbage can into which . various problems and solutions are dumpted by participants . The mix of garbage in a ...
Page 37
... garbage can process and our specifications requires computer simulation . We acknowledge immediately that no real system can be fully characterized in this way . Nonetheless , the simulated organizations exhibit behaviors which can be ...
... garbage can process and our specifications requires computer simulation . We acknowledge immediately that no real system can be fully characterized in this way . Nonetheless , the simulated organizations exhibit behaviors which can be ...
Page 335
... garbage can available for such general issues as participation , power , and university governance . Because of this , it attracted parti- cipants who had little direct interest in the physics department . Physics was the only arena ...
... garbage can available for such general issues as participation , power , and university governance . Because of this , it attracted parti- cipants who had little direct interest in the physics department . Physics was the only arena ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote