Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 74
Page 138
... given ( the variable might be unimportant , or a given faculty member may rank a candidate as number one in spite of the fact that he is scoring high on a certain variable ; that is , the criteria is not of such negative importance that ...
... given ( the variable might be unimportant , or a given faculty member may rank a candidate as number one in spite of the fact that he is scoring high on a certain variable ; that is , the criteria is not of such negative importance that ...
Page 248
... given choice . Deadline conditions lead to the emergence of several distinctive alternations in the flow of problems and participation : garbage ejection , energy con- servation and the multiplication of competence . What tactical ...
... given choice . Deadline conditions lead to the emergence of several distinctive alternations in the flow of problems and participation : garbage ejection , energy con- servation and the multiplication of competence . What tactical ...
Page 280
... given point in time , but has a more long run perspec- tive . Given an organization with different positions and different degrees of participation and power connected to each ( which is assumed to be relatively stable ) , we consider ...
... given point in time , but has a more long run perspec- tive . Given an organization with different positions and different degrees of participation and power connected to each ( which is assumed to be relatively stable ) , we consider ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote