Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 18
Page 185
... natural , therefore , that presidents should have a special concern with academic policy decisions . Most presidents take pride in the academic program of their school and see themselves as performing an important supportive role with ...
... natural , therefore , that presidents should have a special concern with academic policy decisions . Most presidents take pride in the academic program of their school and see themselves as performing an important supportive role with ...
Page 189
... natural sciences . The major participants will not ordinarily see it that way , of course . Policy is negotiated without clear distinctions between nobility and necessity . We observed little inclination among administrators to ...
... natural sciences . The major participants will not ordinarily see it that way , of course . Policy is negotiated without clear distinctions between nobility and necessity . We observed little inclination among administrators to ...
Page 267
... natural outgrowth of a sharing of interests , Jones , Watkins , and Larson began talking about a three - course sequence ( one course taught by each ) they might jointly offer . Late in 1969 Jones approached the chairman of the ...
... natural outgrowth of a sharing of interests , Jones , Watkins , and Larson began talking about a three - course sequence ( one course taught by each ) they might jointly offer . Late in 1969 Jones approached the chairman of the ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote