Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 22
Page 321
... Physics who also took an active part in its work . It consisted of four full professors , one junior faculty and the secretary who later became department - secretary in the physics department . Other groups either reacted , trying to ...
... Physics who also took an active part in its work . It consisted of four full professors , one junior faculty and the secretary who later became department - secretary in the physics department . Other groups either reacted , trying to ...
Page 329
... physics department took place . Reorganization took place in a specific economic and professional context . In Norway , as in most other industrialized countries , the decade from 1958-1968 was an exciting one for people in physics . A ...
... physics department took place . Reorganization took place in a specific economic and professional context . In Norway , as in most other industrialized countries , the decade from 1958-1968 was an exciting one for people in physics . A ...
Page 335
... physics department . Physics was the only arena available for expressing their concerns . Major features of the process , such as the drop in outside participants during the second phase of the process , is related to the increase in ...
... physics department . Physics was the only arena available for expressing their concerns . Major features of the process , such as the drop in outside participants during the second phase of the process , is related to the increase in ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote