Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsScandinavian University Press, 1979 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 42
Page 294
... professors and the associate professors have a very strong majority ) , the deans of the seven schools ( Fakultet ) and one representative elected by the assistant professors and one by the students . The director of the university and ...
... professors and the associate professors have a very strong majority ) , the deans of the seven schools ( Fakultet ) and one representative elected by the assistant professors and one by the students . The director of the university and ...
Page 319
... professors had to be relieved of routine- work , but to deny the importance of coordination of different sub- departments . Each sub - department should make all the important decisions and be governed by the full professor in the field ...
... professors had to be relieved of routine- work , but to deny the importance of coordination of different sub- departments . Each sub - department should make all the important decisions and be governed by the full professor in the field ...
Page 332
... professors with the highest teaching load ( lektor ) increased from 2 in 1957 to 29 in 1965. During the first half of the 1960's the ratio of full professors / associate professors to assistant professors was .3 . The prospects for ...
... professors with the highest teaching load ( lektor ) increased from 2 in 1957 to 29 in 1965. During the first half of the 1960's the ratio of full professors / associate professors to assistant professors was .3 . The prospects for ...
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity arena assembly attention attitudes behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects enrollment expect faculty members full professors garbage garbage can model goals Hedmark house meeting ideology illegitimacy implementation important individual interest interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less level of aspiration major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choice outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible presidents problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenure theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo values variables Vest-Agder Vestfold Vice-Chancellor vote