 The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved.  A Treatise on the Law of Torts - Page 438by Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1876Full view - About this book
 | 1869 - 972 pages
...delivered the judgment of the Exchequer Chamber in this case, and observed as follows : " The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1867 - 468 pages
...sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. (3) That principle is acted... | |
 | Albert Venn Dicey - 1870 - 582 pages
...sensible distiuctlon can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved ... In all ^the] cases [in which... | |
 | India - 1878 - 710 pages
...sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon... | |
 | Francis Wharton - 1874 - 960 pages
...B. Ashton, LR 4 QB 476. § 161. Thus it has been judicially declared in England,1 that "the general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon... | |
 | Thomas William Saunders - 1874 - 238 pages
...serviceable distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule, is that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the matter be proved : (Laugher v. Pointer, 5 B. &... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1874 - 880 pages
...for 1 So in Barwick ». English Joint Stock Bank, LR 2 Ex. 265-6, the Court observe, " The general rule is that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 pages
...benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...as is committed in the course of the service, and lor the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 830 pages
...drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is anewerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is...in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher p. Pointer,... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1876 - 762 pages
...was committed by the agent in the transaction of the ordinary business of the principal. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...express command or privity by the master or principal be proved(c). Thus, a trustee who employs a solicitor to invest the money of the cestui que trust, is... | |
| |
