Argumentation in Practice

Front Cover
Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser
John Benjamins Publishing, 2005 M09 22 - 368 pages
Since the late 1950s the study of argumentation has developed from a marginal part of logic and rhetoric into a genuine interdisciplinary academic discipline. After having first been primarily concerned with creating an adequate philosophical perspective on argumentation, argumentation theorists have gradually shifted their focus of attention to a more immediate concern with the ins and outs of argumentative praxis. What exactly are the characteristics of situated argumentative discourse in different argumentative action types ? How is the discourse influenced by institutional and contextual constraints? In what way can prominent cases of argumentative discourse be fruitfully analysed? Argumentation in Practice aims to provide insight into some important facets of argumentative praxis and the different ways in which it can be approached. The first part of this volume, Conceptions of problems in argumentative practice , introduces useful theoretical perspectives. The second part, Empirical studies of argumentative practice , contains both empirical studies of a general kind and several types of specific case studies.
 

Contents

Introduction
1
Forms and conceptions of argumentation
9
The issue in argumentation practice and theory
11
Hearing is believing
29
Lets talk
43
Indicators of dissociation
53
A collaborative model of argumentation in dyadic problemsolving interactions
69
The argumentative dimension of discourse
87
Competing demands multiple ideals and the structure of argumentation practices
181
Arguments of victims
197
Coductive and abductive foundations for sentimental arguments in politics
215
Reparations or separation?
231
Discursive collisions
251
Aesthetic arguments and civil society
267
The use of arguments from perceived opposition in US terrorism policy
285
How could official speakers communicate reasonably with their king?
305

Designing premises
99
On the pragmatics of argumentative discourse
115
From argument analysis to cultural keywords and back again
125
Empirical studies of argumentative practice
143
The accusation of amalgame as a metaargumentative refutation
145
Constructing the imagined antagonist in advertising argumentation
163
Argument density and argument diversity in the license applications of French provincial printers 16691781
321
Inventional capacity
337
The conventional validity of the pragmadialectical freedom rule
349
Index
367
the series Controversies
369
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information