Page images
PDF
EPUB

Reformer, Sir D. Sandford, addressed to the Trades' Unions of Glasgow.

"In a contest between capital and labour, taking into account the state of matters in this country, capital must ultimately triumph, at the expense of much confusion and much misery. I can see nothing in this opinion to retract or qualify. It will recommend itself, I think, to the acquiescence of all who examine the question with their eyes open, unblinded by the metaphysical definitions of political economy. The capital by which, in conjunction with labour, our manufactures are carried on, must all be classed under the heads of works and machinery, raw materials, and money. By a unanimous refusal to labour, the workmen may throw the capital of the first description into temporary inactivity; or by an insurrectionary movement, they may destroy both it and the stores of raw material now in the kingdom. Thus may they inflict a heavy loss upon the proprietors; sure, however, in the end to bring want and woe upon themselves. But they cannot at one blow destroy the money already accumulated, or that command of money which credit and connexion give. These potent weapons are in the hands of their employers. Let the workmen meditate upon the inevitable consequence. If one party is to try to starve out the other, the longer purses and wealthier connexions of the masters will carry them through the struggle, and their opponents will gain nothing beyond the suffering attendant on a painful and perilous experiment; or monied capital will take its flight to other lands, where labour assumes a less menacing attitude, and offers the prospect of more secure returns. The labouring classes should remember that capital of this kind, once scared away, is not easily courted back; and they should turn their attention for a moment to certain provinces of Ireland, as a specimen of the condition to which a people may be degraded, chiefly by the absence of capital, arising from the absence of security. Thus I fear that despair at last, if not evil design in the first instance, might drive the working population into the frantic excess of rebellion against law, and attacks on property.

But he who holds out hopes of final success to a movement of that character is either a fool or a villain. Even without the aid of a numerous and welldisciplined army, a British insurrection

of the labouring classes would assuredly
be put down, perhaps with much blood-
The
shed on the field and the scaffold.
holders of property are strong enough to
defend themselves, by a general rally of
the upper and middle ranks in our cities
and our rural districts. I do not appre-
hend a new edition of the Bristol confla-
gration. I am pretty confident that on
the stage of this country, we shall not
behold enacted the dismal scenes of the
first French Revolution. And if these
tragedies were to be repeated in our days,
will any member of the working body
point out one result, beneficial to that
most important but dependent class, to
which they could reasonably be expected
to give birth?"

These observations are deserving
of the most serious consideration,
and by none more than the wretched,
deluded men, who are now tempted
by their democratic leaders to at-
" inert
tempt what they term an
conspiracy" against the whole capi-
tal and wealth of the state. Do they
really conceive it possible they can
succeed in such a design? Is there
any example in the history of man-
kind of such a conspiracy, how
"inert" soever, proving successful?
Have they funds to enable them to
hold out against the capital and re-
sources of the masters, the accumu
lations of centuries, supported, as
they will be, by the banks, the monied
men, the government? The Trades'
Unions tell, and we grieve to hear
the fact, that there are 50,000 families
in and around Glasgow, and as many
in and around Manchester and Bir-
mingham, who do not know at night
that the bread for their little ones
will be baked to-morrow. The Libe-
rator boasts that there were 2000
operatives in Glasgow in January
last, who had struck work, whose
weekly maintenance cost L.500. At
this rate, which is evidently the lowest
on which a human being can sub-
sist, (5s. a-week,) 200,000 operatives
would cost L.50,000 a-week, and a
million, L.250,000.* Are they pre-
pared with vast funds of this de-
scription to sustain their efforts?
And is 78. a-week, the amount, as they
tell us, of their present earnings, a
likely source from which to derive
them?

• Liberator and Trades' Union Gazette, Jan. 24, 1834.

But this is not all.-Such vast assemblages of working-men, thrown out of work simultaneously, will, to the end of time, inevitably generate acts of violence and deeds of blood. Oppression towards their fellow-creatures is the necessary and universal result of the congregation of thirty or forty thousand idle, unrestrained men together-nothing short of military discipline can ever restrain them. Among such vast bodies, there will always be found many daring reckless characters, who will not scruple to perpetrate acts of the greatest atrocity, to forward the purposes of the union. It is not in human nature to sit with its hands across, and see strangers introduced to work at reduced wages, and thus defeat all the purposes of the combination, without taking the short and simple way of knocking them on the head. The rapid growth of the atrocious practice of throwing vitriol in the manufacturing districts, proves how general the operation of these principles has become. It is truly observed in a late publication on this subject

"If the working classes could be brought to combine without using violence towards those who do not enter into their views, the evil, how great soever, would be comparatively inconsiderable to what is now presented; but, unfortunately, this never can be the case. Among the thousands and tens of thousands who are combined together to gain these common objects, there always have been, and always will be, found some reck less and worthless characters who will not scruple to exert violence, or even embrue their hands in the blood of such of their fellow-citizens as, by holding out, threaten to defeat the object of their com bination. To the end of time such worthless characters will be found in all

large bodies of mankind; they may be calculated upon as a given quantity to the last days of the world; and therefore, violence, intimidation, and bloodshed may be permanently expected to attend such combinations. The trades' unions, therefore, however plausible in theory, become, in practice, the mere association of violence and tyranny, over industry and peace; they are the engine by which the most lawless and reckless of society

are enabled securely to exercise a grinding oppression over the more quiet and inoffensive. They subvert the whole objects of society, defeat the chief ends of the social union, and expose the poor to a tyranny the more galling and dangerous, that it is exercised by men of their own rank in society, and supported by the physical strength of vast masses in the state.'

But suppose that this were not to be the result, and that by a simultaneous strike of several hundred thousand men, over the whole country, the present object of obtaining a deduction of two hours a-day from the period of work is gained - What will be the result? Will wages remain at their present level, low as it is, under such a reduction? Unquestionably not. They will, and must fall, just in proportion to the diminution in the produce of looms; and the condition of the workman will be more miserable than ever. By no human contrivance-by no "inert intimidation or violence, or conspiracy," can capitalists and masters be compelled to pay wages, which are a loss to themselves, or abridge materially the present slender rate of profits:-rather than do so, capital will take wings to itself, and emigrate to other and more tranquil lands; and the peopled houses of Britain will be filled with starving millions, deprived by their own suicidal hands of the means of subsistence.

The frantic anarchical course which the workmen are now pursuing, therefore, is as little calculated to afford the many effectual relief, as the blind and infatuated support of the democratic faction in towns has been; while it threatens to produce results more immediately ruinous and destructive than even the Reform Bill, that stupendous monument of general infatuation, is in the course of effecting. The one is a burning delirium, which will at once prostrate the patriot; the other a low fever, which will gradually, but certainly, exhaust his strength.

An extensive struggle has lately broke out in the west of Scot

Thoughts on the Reformed Ministry and the Reformed Parliament.-P. 37. Stillies. Edinburgh, 1834.

land, in consequence of a resolution of the masters to employ no calicoprinters who were members of the Trades' Unions, and bringing down new hands to supply the place of those who refused to abandon these pernicious associations. The result has been just what might have been anticipated. Where the military were in sufficient force to protect the new workmen from the violence of the associated trades, the masters have proved victorious, and the fresh hands are going on; where they were not, the associated operatives succeeded in expelling them. Twelve delinquents, apprehended by the Glasgow police, were liberated by the mob: eight unhappy prisoners are securely lodged within the walls of Stirling Castle. The west of Scotland is approaching the condition of Ireland: the authority of law exists, where soldiers stand, or the guns of fortresses protect the prisoners. Where the defence of the industrious is left to themselves, they are compelled to yield to the unionists. Such are the fruits of Whig Government! We insert with pleasure the following just observations of the Glasgow Herald on this subject:-*

"Nothing can equal the infatuation of the operative printers in the whole of this business: they had comparatively light work and comparatively high wages; but these very circumstances, along with the notion of more skill being required in their profession, led them to consider themselves superior to the ordinary run of workmen, and their vanity thus exposed them to become easy tools in the hands of the revolutionists. Elated with the brilliant figure which they had made in reform processions, they flattered themselves that they were the pets of Government, and would get their own way in every thing, even when they attempted to enact the part of tyrants over their fellow-labour

ers.

While they affected the spirit of independence, they basely submitted to live on contributions from others; and those of them who were married had the injustice and inhumanity to deprive their families of more than a half of their usual rate of subsistence. While they were proudly lording it over others to whom they denied the freedom both of judging and of acting, a large portion of them

selves were abject slaves, trembling under that very intimidation which they were labouring to inflict en others—at least such is the defence that is resorted to by those who have abandoned the Unions.

"Those Trades' Unions, which now cause so much confusion and alarm in the

country, originated in the former Political Unions, which were organized under the direction of itinerant orators and agitators, of which apostles of mischief in this part of the country the chief was Mr Joseph Hume, M. P. No merit would have attached to his successful exertions to abolish the laws against combinations, which had existed in England since the time of Edward I., unless they had been followed by practical results, and those results we now see before us."

Is, then, the cause of industry and production utterly hopeless? Have the monied classes, the traders, the shop-keepers, succeeded, by the insidious spread of democratical principles, in for ever dividing the productive classes, who are the source of all their wealth, but, from want of equal cunning, have been the unhappy victims of their artifice? Are the working classes for ever to follow the red flag of democracy to their own perdition, instead of the old banner of England, under which all classes once throve and were prosperous? Will mankind ever be governed by words, and worship the demon who flatters their passions, regardless of the bread which is vanishing out of their mouths, the furniture which is melting away from their dwellings, the clothes which are slipping from their backs? Such is the force of public delusion, such the astonishing manner in which the productive classes have been arrayed against each other by the arts of the democratic or consuming faction, that we much fear their ascendency will continue, that the situation of the whole industrious classes, both in town and country, under their democratic leaders, will daily become worse, until at length the cup of misery is full, and military despotism closes the scene.

But one thing is perfectly clear, that if this deplorable result does take place, it will not be because the means of extrication are utterly lost

• Glasgow Herald, Feb. 10, 1834.

to the nation. By a cordial union with, and support of, the Conservative body; by a junction of the strength of the agricultural and manufacturing producers, they may yet shake off the monstrous load of shopkeepers, money-lenders, and traders who have risen into such fatal preeminence on their distresses. The classes who constitute the ten millions will be too strong, if united in a constitutional struggle, for the five; the producers of four hundred millions a-year of produce must, in the end, if they will only act together, overcome those who produce one. The Reform Bill, indeed, has quadrupled the political power of the urban and monied party, and reduced to less than a half the forces of industry; the manufacturing operatives have to thank themselves for having given this monstrous addition to the forces of their adversaries, and weakened so alarmingly the strength of their friends. Still the case is not utterly hopeless; their own acts are likely to relieve them; the extremity of suffering, which they have brought upon themselves, may perhaps prove the means of dispelling the universal delusions by which they have been blinded. But let us not be misunderstood; it is by constitutional means, and constitutional means alone, that the bat tle must be fought; the Conserva◄ tives never can, and never will, become Radicals; the Operatives must become Conservatives. We do not say Conservatives, in the false and odious sense in which the falsehood of the urban consumers uses it,-that is, as the supporters of unjust or corrupt power, such as the Democrats falsely assert governed the country before the Reform Bill,-we say Conservatives in the sense in which, and in which alone, we have ever supported it; as the defenders of all the great interests in the State, and especially of the vast bodies of agricultural and manufacturing producers, from whose labours four-fifths of the national income flows; by whose hands all classes are fed and clothed, and lodged. We say Conservatives, not as the enemies of the real and just interests of the consumers and monied men, but of that unjust and oppressive advantage which they have gained by the towndirected legislation of the last fifteen

years, and which has brought on the nation the unspeakable calamities of free trade, contracted currency, Democratic Government, and the threatened change in the Corn Laws. We say Conservatives, as the steady friends of the Church, the shield of the poor against infidel attack and city corruption; as the supporters of the national faith against the combined attacks of Radical violence and public suffering, and as thoroughly convinced that it is only by doing justice, and protecting equally all interests, and most of all the Funds, the great Savings' Bank of the poor, that the national salvation can be accomplished. We say Conservatives, not as deluded by the idea so lamentably prevalent of late years, that it is by destroying the interests, either of rural or urban producers, by the free and unrequited admission of foreign produce, that the great surplus revenue of the nation, the fountain of prosperity to all classes, can be augmented; but by such protecting measures as will secure to our operatives, whether in town or country, a due return for the fruits of their toil, and cease to grind down the British labourers for the benefit of the city Democrats, or the advantage of foreign states.

The views we have now sketched out, explain that gradual, but evidently increasing approximation of the Conservatives and the industrious classes, at which the Whigs so loudly exclaim as a monstrous union of Tories and Radicals. This outcry comes with peculiar consistency and good grace from the correspondents of political unions, from those who bowed to deputations headed by tailors, from the advocates of the brickbat and the bludgeon, and the Journals who, by the open threat of Radical violence, overturned the constitution. The approximation proceeds from no political coalition, from no insidious or designing ambition. It is the result of the experience of common injury; of the instinct which leads men, of whatever opposite opinions, on most subjects, to unite against those by whom they have both suffered wrong. But it must be a very different coalition from that which history will for ever execrate; be attended by no such de

reliction of public duty as that of their opponents. What the servile ministerial Press, the Receivers of mandates from Lord Brougham and Holland House, call an union of Tories and Radicals, must be founded on very different principles from that atrocious combination of monied ambition and Radical delusion which has produced, and is producing, such fatal consequences. It must be founded on an abandonment of all anarchical designs, and all demonstrations of violence by the latter, and of all monied delusions by the former; a return by our rulers to the principles of just remuneration to productive industry, whether in town or country, and by our people to the subordination and loyalty of former times; a recurrence, in short, to the true

principles and practice of the constitution, before the disastrous days of monied ambition, cheap labour, free trade, and Democratic, that is city ascendency. Whether by these or any other methods, it is possible to get the better of the Reform Bill, and the decisive superiority it has given to consumers over producers in the legislature, is perhaps doubtful; but this much at least seems certain, that in no other way is so fair a prospect even opened of shunning perdition, or avoiding that gradual but unceasing degradation of the working classes, and the Conservatives who depend on their labour, which has been constantly increasing since the deporable era when the Nation was surrendered to the guidance of its democratic deceivers.

CASTLE ELMere,

A TALE OF POLITICAL GRATITUDE.

CHAP. I.

MISREPRESENTATION CORRECTED.

Castle Elmere, June 10, 18-. "HERE, my dear Katharine, I am still -not carried off to the mountains by any of the savage Irish-not even penitent for my folly in coming into this land of barbarism and holy water-(too holy, defamers would say, to be employed in very necessary ablutions)-but, let dear Aunt Sarah remember, my own land after all. Here I am, and in my mind the fixed resolve never to rest contented, until I have wiled you hither, and won you to a knowledge, that the report of our poor people's misdeeds is fearfully exaggerated by the distance to which it is borne. Ah! Kate, we suffer much wrong-the pictures of us are very frightful-but, had a lion been the painter!' We are the prey of more ignoble brutes, who slander us as unworthy of trust or regard, and are full of indignation, because, now and then, some victim cries out, and complains of his affliction. Lie still, cries the horrid Polyphemus,-I have no pleasure in my dinner while you scream so;but I forget, he slew his prey before he devoured it. Here our torturers prefer the Abyssinian practice, and

would drag life from their miserable victims by degrees. Who can wonder that the murmurs of the wretched shall not be modulated into mu

sic for them?

"Thank God! thank God! my dear friend, in our peaceful retreat no such murmurings distress us, and no despair is to be dreaded. My window at which I write, is openit is midnight-and midnight still as is now shining on your own beautiful Wycombe. How powerfully I am recalled to the hours, when the dawn stole unobserved on our prolonged good-nights and musings, when we spoke not, but sat together in the shade of your window's deep recess, and felt as if we understood the nightingale's song, and listened to it as the voice of our unspoken emotions. Do you remember, Katharine, when the notes were changed, and the lark that sung so out of tune, straining harsh discords and unpleasing sharps, proclaimed, that the world was come again; and that if we would continue to dream, we must qualify by sleeping?-What a painful endowment memory would be, if we had not hope to beguile it!

I do indeed, Katharine, earnestly

« PreviousContinue »