The free flow of internal information and viewpoints is the foundation of Each employee should also be made aware that the Commission intends the Finally I should like you and all the office directors to reemphasize your own commitment to free and open communication within the Commission. This ought to include not only the regular chain by which most issues will be presented and resolved, but regular meetings or other occasions with staff at all levels at which employee concerns of every sort can be aired. As you well know, none of these measures reflects change in course or practice for the Commission. Recent developments, including allegations that dissenting employees are unable to bring their views to the attention of top management within the Commission, however, have suggested the appropriateness of reaffirming our commitment to a regulatory process which is open internally as well as externally. Please take the necessary steps to convey these views to the attention of every NRC employee. This should include providing a copy of this memorandum to each employee. III-9 PHILLIP BURTON, CALIF. ROBERT W. KASTENMEER, WIS. TESHO BONCALID, WTO. JONATHAN B. BENGNAM, N.Y. DE LUGO, V.J. GOCOLOR E. STRON, MD. JUNE BENITEZ, P.R. IM SANTIN, MEV. PALE, E, TECINGAS, MASS, ALLANT. HOWE, UTAN JAMES WEAVER, ONES. BOD CARR, MICH GEORGE MILLER, CALIF. THEDDORE M. (TED) RISENNDOVER, OKLA JAMES J. FLORIO, NJ. JOE SKUBITZ, KANB. A pervasive belief among persons interested in nuclear matters is that important decisions are made without sufficient public understanding of their bases. As I have indicated before, I believe the nuclear industry cannot be viable unless there is widespread confidence in the regulatory process. One means of achieving confidence is to ensure a detailed public record of the Commission's transactions. To this end I am interested in records of the Commission's deliberations. In particular I would appreciate your indicating for the year 1975 the number of meetings held by the Commission, the number of votes taken by the Commission, the breakdown of votes according to the general nature of the subject matter (i.e. adjudicatory, rule making or broad policy making, and administrative), a breakdown of votes among commissioners on specific matters, and the extent to which minutes are kept of discussions so that there might be awareness of the considerations which have influenced the various decisions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Morris K. Udall Chairman, Subcommittee on |