Cases Affirmed.

Cases Affirmed.

the Essex County Circuit Court. (Affirmance in part.)

182

White, Administrator, Appellant. From the Supreme Court,

251

15. Edward Naylor, Sr., Respond6. Overseer of the Poor of the

ent, v. George H. Knapp et al., Town of Montclair et al., Re

Appellants. From the Supreme spondents, v. Charles W. Eason,

Court,

253 Appellant. From the Supreme ('ourt,

199
16. New York Switch and Cross-

ing Co., Appellant, v. Rose Mul7. Gumaerd Lead and Zinc Co..

lenbach et al., Respondent. Respondent, v. Erie Railroad

From the Supreme Court, 254 Co., Appellant. From the Supreme Court,

216
17. Hill Haber, Respondent,

Harris Goldberg, Appellant. 8. Crucible Steel Co. of America,

From the Supreme Court, 367 Appellant, v. Polack Tyre and Rubber Co., Respondent. From

18. State of New Jersey, Defendthe Supreme Court,

221

ant in Error, v. Michael Con

tarino, Plaintiff in Error. From 9. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of

the Supreme Court, 91 N. J. L. Maryland, Appellant, v. Brock's

103,

381 Garage, Incorporated, Respondent. From the Supreme Court.

19. Luke B. Carter et al., Execu239

tors, &c., Appellants, V. New

ton A. K. Bugbee, State Comp10. John B. Burtis. Respondent,

troller, Respondent. From the v. Edward O. Haines, Appel

Supreme Court, 91 N. J. L. 438, lant. From the Supreme Court,

390 91 N. J. L. 4,

248

20. Ingersoll-Rand Co., Appellant, 11. Patrick Crane, Appellant, v.

v. United States Fidelity and The Mayor and Aldermen of

Guaranty

Co.,

Respondent. Jersey City et al., Respondents.

From the Supreme Court, 403 From the Supreme Court, 90 N. J. L. 109,

248 21. Gustave Kein. Respondent. .

Nathan Katz, Appellant. From 12. William E. Crosby, Appellant.

the Union County Circuit 1. The City of East Orange, Re

Court,

406 spondent. From the Supreme Court,

249 22. The Borough of Chatham, Ap

pellant, v. Sisters of Charity of

St. Elizabeth et al., Respond13. Ved K. Finkelstein, Respond

ents. From the Supreme Court, ent, v. Herman Geismar, Ap

409 pellant. From the Supreme Court, 91 N. J. L. 46, 251 23. Hackensack Trust Co.. Ad

ministrator, Appellant, 1. Eva 14. The Board of Chosen Free- Van Den Berg, Administrator,

holders of the County of Bur- Respondent. From the Supreme lington, Respondent, v, J. Harryl Court,

412 Cases Affirmed.

Cases Affirmed.

24. Anna V. Higgins et al., Re- spondent. From the Supreme

spondents, v. Goerke Kirch Co., Court, 90 N. J. L. 355, 508 Appellant. From the Supreme Court, 91 N. J. L. 464, 424 35. Burlington Sewerage Co., Re

spondent, v. The City of Bur25. New York Central Railroad lington, Appellant. From the Co., Respondent, v. Frank Pe- Supreme Court,

508 trozzo, Appellant. From

the Supreme Court,

425 36. Collingswood Sewerage Co.,

Respondent, v. The Borough of 26. Caroline Cronecker, Appellant, Collingswood, Appellant. From

v. Charles R. Hall, Respondent. the Supreme Court, 91 N. J. L. From the Supreme Court, 450 20,

509

27. Transparent Rubber Works,

37. Alfred Crew, Appellant, Respondent, International

Thomas Trainor et t'.

al., ReGlass Co., Appellant. From the

spondents. From the Supreme Supreme Court, 461

512 Court, 91 N. J. L. 87,

28. New Jersey Fidelity and Plate 38. Margaret H. Dixon, RespondGlass Insurance Co., Respond

ent, v. Clayton L. Andrews, ent, v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Appellant. From the Supreme Co., Appellant. From the Su

Court, 91 N. J. L. 373, 512 preme Court,

467

Cases Affirmed.

Cases Affirmed.

ers of Hudson County et al., 153. Edmund B. Conant, RespondRespondents. From the Su- ent, v. Robert M. Pettit, Appreme Court, 91 N. J. L. 137.' pellant. From the Supreme 519 Court,

543

45. Edward L. McCarty, Appel-54. Elizabeth Reilly, Administra

lant, v. Boulevard Commission- trix, Appellant, v. The Mayor ere of Hudson County et al., and Common Council of New Respondents. From the Su- Brunswick, Respondent. From preme Court, 91 N. J. L. 137, the Supreme Court,

547 519

55. Harold Depue et al., Respond46. Borough of Middlesex, Appel-i

ents, v. George D. Salmon Co., lant, V. The Inhabitants of the

Appellant. From the Essex City of Plainfield et al., Re

County Circuit Court, 550 spondents. From the Supreme Court,

520

56. Alita E. Hough, Respondent,

v. Heller Brothers ('o., Appel17. The Inhabitants of the City

lant. From the Essex County of Plainfield et al., Respondents,

Circuit Court,

552 r. The State Board of Taxes and Assessments et al., Appel- 57. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff lants. From the Supreme

in Error, v. Louis Levin. DeCourt,

520
fendant in Error. From the

553 18. The Inhabitants of the City

Supreme Court, of Plainfield et al., Respondents, 1. The State Board of Taxes 58. Samuel B. Garrison, Respondand Assessments et al., Appel

ent, v. The Borough of Fort lants. From the

From the SuSupreme

Lee, Appellant. Court,

506 520 preme Court, 49. Splitdorf Electrical Co., Re- 59. Annie M. Rhodes et al., Respondent, 1. Anna King, Appel

spondents, 1. Fuller Land and lant. From the Supreme Court,

Improvement Co., Appellant. 90 V. J. L. 121,

524

From the Supreme Court, 569 50. The State of New Jersey, De-GO. William Ferris, Admiristrator, fendant in Error,

1. Joseph

Respondent, v. Frank McArdie, Rosenberg, Plaintiff in Error.

Appellant. From the Hudson From the Supreme Court,

580 525

County Circuit Court, 51. The State of New Jersey, De-'61. Charles F. X. O'Brien, Appelfendant in Error, r. Jacob Ru-'

lant, v. The Board of Public bin, Plaintiff in Error.

al.. From

l'tility Commissioners et

Respondents. From the Supreme Court, 91 V. J. L.

the Su308,

527
preme Court, 92 V. J. L. 44,

587 32. Tressa M. Jensen, Respondent,

V. F. W. Woolworth Co., Appel- 62. Inhabitants of the City of lant. From the Supreme ('ourt, Trenton et al., Appellants. 7.

529 The Board of Public Utility VOL. III.

12

Cases Affirmed.

Cases Affirmed.

Commissioners et al., Respond- 72. First National Bank of Freeents. From the Supreme Court, hold, Appellant, v. Abbie M. 92 N. J. L. 61,

587 Rutter, Respondent. From the

Supreme Court, 91 N, J. L. 424, 6. Simpson B. Lyons, Respond

621 ent, r. Pease Piano Co., Appellant. From the Essex County 73. The Board of Chosen FreeCircuit Court,

592 holders of the County of Mid

dlesex. Appellant, v. The Board 61. Sebastian Tronto, Adminis- of Public Utility Commission

trator, Respondent, v. Reo Mo- ers et al., Respondents. From tor Co., Appellant. From the the Supreme Court, 91 N. J. L. Supreme Court, 595 97,

623

05. Frank Browski, Appellant, v. 74. Samuel W. Garrison et al.,

Delaware, Lackawanna and Respondents, v. The Mayor and Western Railroad Co., Respond- Aldermen of Jersey City et al., ent. From the Supreme Court, Appellants. From the Supreme 597 Court,

624

66. Susan C. Conover. Appellant,|75. Mary Howard, Respondent, 2.

1. Delaware, Lackawanna and Essex Mutual Benefit AssociaWestern Railroad Co., Respond- tion, Appellant. From the Suent. From the Supreme Court, preme Court,

630 002

76. Hyatt Roller Bearing Co., Re67. John Feir.

Respondent. u. spondent, v. Pennsylvania Rail. Charles M. Weil and Joseph road Co., Appellant. From the Whitehead, Appellants. From Supreme Court, 92 N. J. L. 94. the Passaic County Circuit

631 ('ourt,

610

77. S. Martin Jacobsen, Respond68. Carmine Savino, Respondent,

ent, v. Peter A. Peterson, Ap

pellant. From 1. David Goldberg, Appellant.

the Supreme

031 From the Bergen County Cir

Court, 91 N. J. L. 404, cuit Court,

617

Cases Affirmed.

Cases Reversed.

U.

81. John J. McMahon, Appellant, 90. Central Railroad Co. of New

v. Frederick Riker, County Col- Jersey, Appellant, v. The State lector, et al., Respondents. Board of Taxes and AssessFrom the Supreme Court, 92 ments et al., Respondents. N. J. L. 1,

637 From the Supreme Court, 92 N. J. L. 332,

648 82. Maria A. Pfeiffer, Respondent,

v. James E. Crossley, Appel- '91. Hudson and Manhattan Raillant. From the Supreme Court, road Co., Appellant, The 91 N. J. L. 433,

638 State Board of Taxes and As

sessments et al., Respondents. 83. State of New Jersey, Defend- From the Supreme Court, 92 ant in Error, v. Salvatore Ag- N. J. L. 332,

648 nesi, Plaintiff in Error. From the Supreme Court, 92 N. J. L. 92. Raritan River Railroad Co., 53,

638 Appellant, v. The State Board

of Taxes and Assessments et al., 84. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff Respondents. From the Su

in Error, v. Haefel Cohn, De- preme Court, 92 N. J. L. 332. fendant in Error. From the Su

648 preme Court,

641

93. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.. So. State of New Jersey, Defend- Appellant, v. The State Board

ant in Error, Linwood of Taxes and Assessments et al., Haines, Plaintiff in Error. Respondents. From the SuFrom the Supreme Court, 642 preme Court, 92 N. J. L. 332.

648 86. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff

in Error, v. Morris Rudner, De- 94. Erie Railroad Co., Appellant, fendant in Error. From the

v. The State Board of Taxes

and Assessments et al., ReSupreme Court, 92 N. J. L. 20.

045

spondents. From the Supreme

Court, 92 N. J. L. 332, 648 87. The Borough of Totowa, Re

spondent, v. The State Board
of Taxes and Assessments et al., CASES REVERSED.
Appellants. From the Supreme

1. Atlantic Coast Electric Railway Court,

646