 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1922
...conferred upon the jury in all cases of murder. The act does not itself prescribe, nor authorise the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing...the whole matter of its exercise to the judgment and the consciences of the jury. The authority of the jury to decide that the accused shall not be punished... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1899
...conferred upon the Jury in all cases of murder. The act does not itself prescribe, nor authorize the the consciences of the Jury. The authority of the Jury to decide that the accused shall not be punished... | |
 | 1919
...quotes from Winston v. United States as follows : "The act does not itself prescribe, nor authorize the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing the exercise of this risht, but commits the whole matter of its exercise to the judgment and the consciences of the jury."... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1899
...conferred upon the jury in all cases of murder. The act does not itself prescribe, nor authorize the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing...the whole matter of its exercise to the judgment and the consciences of the jury. The authority of the jury to decide that the accused shall not be punished... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1901
...conferred upon the jury in all eases of murder. The act does not itself preecribe, nor authorize the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing...the whole matter of its exercise to the judgment and the consciences of the jury. The authority of the jury to decide that the accused shall not be punished... | |
 | 1911
...conferred upon the jury in all cases of murder. The net does not Itself prescribe, nor authorize the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing...exercise to the judgment and consciences of the jury. The authority of the jury to decide that the accused shall not be punished capitally is not limited... | |
 | 1899
...Gray wrote the opinion of the court. As he says, the act does not itself prescribe, nor authorize the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing...exercise to the judgment and consciences of the jury. The authority of the jury to decide that the accused ah all not be punished capitally is not limited... | |
 | 1919
...quotes from Winston v. United States as follows : "The act does not itself prescribe. DOT authorize the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing the exercise of this ri^ht, but commits the whole matter of its exercise to the judgment and the consciences of the jury."... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1948
...conferred upon the jury in all cases of murder. The act does not itself prescribe, nor authorize the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing...the whole matter of its exercise to the judgment and the -consciences of the jury. The authority of the jury to decide that the accused shall not be punished... | |
 | North Dakota. Supreme Court, Hiram A. Libby, Robert Milligan Carothers, Robert Dimon Hoskins, Edgar Whittlesey Camp, John McDowell Cochrane, Ames Francis Wilbur, Joseph Coghlan, Edwin James Taylor - 1912
...conferred upon the jury in all cases of murder. The act does not itself prescribe, nor authorize the court to prescribe, any rule defining or circumscribing...exercise to the judgment and consciences of the jury. The authority of the jury to decide that the accused shall not be punished capitally is not limited... | |
| |
... and the consciences of the jury. The authority of the jury to decide that the accused shall not be punished capitally is not limited to cases in which , the court, or the jury, is of opinion that there are palliating or mitigating circumstances. But... 
