Page images
PDF
EPUB

850. YAWMAN & ERBE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in classification of roller letter copiers as compared with copying presses. Phillip H. Yawman for complainant. Gardiner Lathrop, Robert Dunlap, W. R. Kelly, Burton Hanson, Chester M. Dawes, R. A. Wilkinson, R. A. Jackson, M. T. Rankin, E. L. Williams, S. A. Lynde, C. N. Travous, Martin L. Clardy, William F. Herrin, and D. A. Chambers for defendants. November 12, 1906. Dismissed, on motion of complainant, to file complaint under new law. (See 927.)

853. NOBLES BROTHERS GROCER COMPANY ET AL. v. FORT WORTH & DENVER CITY RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Violation of sections 1 and 3 in differentials against Amarillo, Tex., in favor of other Texas common points. Veale, Crudington & Bailey for complainants. M. A. Low, Gardiner Lathrop, Robert Dunlap, E. E. Whitted, and Spoonts & Thompson for defendants. November 3, 1906. Dismissed, on motion of complainants, to file complaint under new law. (See 924.) 854. F. S. ULMER v. TEXAS & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY.— Violation of sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 in rate on carload shipment of lumber from Rockland, Tex., to Tampico, Mexico. F. S. Ulmer for complainant. Baker, Potts, Parker, and Garwood for defendants. November 1, 1906. Dismissed, on motion of complainant, to file complaint under new law. (See 921.)

859. FORT SMITH TRAFFIC BUREAU v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in rates on pressed glassware, including tableware, lamps, and lamp chimneys from Pittsburg, Pa., and Gas City, Ind., to Fort Smith and other points in Arkansas. J. E. Hundley for complainant. John G. Williams, A. P. Burgwin, L. F. Parker, W. H. Evans, J. G. Egan, and Martin L. Clardy for defendants. November 5, 1906. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

864. D. & K. FERTILIZER COMPANY v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in rate on sulphuric acid in tank cars from La Salle, Peru, and Winona, Ill., to Indianapolis, Ind. Edward D. Kingsbury for complainant. John B. Cockrum, Chester M. Dawes, A. P. Burgwin, W. T. Jackson, M. T. Rankin, and F. S. Winslow for defendants. February 14, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant; complaint satisfied.

868. HOWARD MILLS COMPANY v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in rates on flour from Wichita, Kans., to San Francisco, Cal., and other Pacific coast terminals. J. E. Howard for complainant. Martin L. Clardy, John W.

Baldwin, Chester M. Dawes, R. A. Jackson, M. T. Rankin, William F. Herrin, and P. F. Dunne for defendants. October 30, 1906. Dismissed, on motion of complainant, to file complaint under new law. (See 917.)

870. JOSEPH P. MCCANN v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY.-Violation of section 3 in refusing to handle a personally conducted tour of Kismet Temple of the Mystic Shrine from Brooklyn, N. Y., to Los Angeles, Cal. Alexander & Green for complainant. Gardiner Lathrop and Robert Dunlap for defendants. September 24, 1906. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

871. E. T. RAINEY v. CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY.-Violation of sections 2 and 3 in shipments of dressed poultry, ice packed, from Eldorado, Ill., to New York, N. Y. C. H. Layman for complainant. J. H. Ingalls and L. J. Hackney for defendants. October 19, 1906. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

872. RIVERSIDE MILLS v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.— Violation of sections 1 and 3 in rate on waste from Augusta, Ga., to New York. R. J. Southall for complainant. Ed. Baxter and Claudian B. Northrop for defendants. October 30, 1906. Dismissed, on motion of complainant, to file complaint under new law. (See 916.)

874. TEXAS CEMENT PLASTER COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in rates on wall plaster from Quanah, Tex., to Kansas City and St. Louis. S. M. Gloyd for complainant. L. F. Parker, John G. Egan, and C. H. Gookum for defendant. December 11, 1906. Dismissed, on motion of complainant, to file complaint under new law. (See 945.)

877. J. R. LUCAS & COMPANY v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in reconsignment charge on hay at East St. Louis, Ill. Forman & Whitnell for complainant. Ed. Baxter for defendant. November 3, 1906. Dismissed, on motion of complainant, to file complaint under new law. (See 923.)

881. EDWARD B. GROSSMAN COMPANY v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY EXPRESS.-Violation of section 3 in refusing to accept for transportation packages marked "C. O. D." Edward B. Grossman for complainant. Alexander & Green and William P. Sidley for defendant. March 18, 1907. Dismissed for want of prosecution.

882. E. P.PECK. MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANYViolation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in failure to furnish cars and excessive charge on carload of corn from Tulsa, Ind. Ter., to Galveston, Texas. Sherman & Fletcher for complainant. James Hagerman, Joseph W. Bryson, and Clifford L. Jackson for defendant. May 6, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

900. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF EL PASO, TEXAS, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in refusing to recognize El Paso, Tex., as a Texas common point. E. Moye for complainant. C. K. Dunlap for defendants. October 15, 1906. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

901. CLEVELAND PROVISION COMPANY v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in rates on live hogs from Chicago, St. Louis, and Kansas City and other Missouri River points to Cleveland, and on boxed meats from Cleveland to New York and other Atlantic seaboards. F. W. Treadway for complainant. J. E. Morley for defendants. May 20, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

902. H. CLAY JONES COMPANY v. PHILADELPHIA, BALTIMORE & WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in establishing minimum carload weight on manure and in requiring prepayment of freight charges. H. Clay Jones for complainant. George Stuart Patterson, Francis I. Gowen, and George V. Massey for defendant. October 10, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

921. F. S. ULMER v. TEXAS & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY.Violation of sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 in charge on two carload shipments of lumber from Rockland, Tex., to Tampico, Mexico. Mr. Meyers for complainant. H. M. Garwood, of Baker, Potts, Parker & Garwood, for defendant. November 6, 1907. Dismissed on request of complainant; complaint satisfied.

922. SANTA FE CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in refusing to make joint through rates on passenger traffic at Kennedy, N. Mex., or allowing interchange of round-trip passenger rates. Samuel B. Grimshaw for complainant. Gardiner Lathrop and Robert Dunlap for defendant. January 16, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

932. KINSELLA GRAIN COMPANY v. CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 through failure to allow carload rates on combined shipments of corn and oats from Blairstown, Iowa, to Chicago, Ill. W. E. Kinsella for complainant. S. A. Lynde and C. C Wright for defendants. March 18, 1907. Dismissed for want of prosecution.

937. PITTMAN & HARRISON COMPANY v. MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on animal and poultry food from Sherman, Tex., to Vicksburg, Miss. J. P. Harrison for complainant. James Hagerman and Ed. Baxter for defendants. November 1, 1907. Dismissed; complaint satisfied.

938. GRAY-BRYAN COAL COMPANY v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY.-Car coal overcharge on weight, Kansas City, Mo. C. W. Durbin for complainant. February 21, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

948. S. P. WETHERILL COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on earth paint from Philadelphia to western points compared with import rates. Henry C. Stewart for complainant. B. Hanson for defendants. December 29, 1906. Dismissed on motion of complainant; complaint satisfied.

956. HOME LUMBER COMPANY V. PHILADELPHIA, BALTIMORE & WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on seven carloads lumber Landover, Md., to Hyattsville, Md. Robinson White for complainant. George Stewart and John G. Wilson for defendant. April 1, 1907. Complaint satisfied; dismissed on motion of defendant.

966. WISCONSIN BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY.-Iron bridge rates from Milwaukee, Wis., to Kansas City, Mo. Andrews Allen for complainant. Burton Hanson for defendant. April 1, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

968. M. L. RHODES v. MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY.-Rates on cattle from Kiowa, Kans., to Kansas City, Mo. C. W. Durbin for complainant. James Hagerman and Joseph Bryson for defendant. March 18, 1907. Dismissed for want of prosecution.

972. MAYER COAL COMPANY v. MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY.-Switching charge at Kansas City, Mo. John Mayer for complainant. James Hagerman and Joseph Bryson for defendant. March 19, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

977. FORT SMITH TRAFFIC BUREAU v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on glassware from Pittsburg, Pa., and Gas City, Ind., to Fort Smith, Ark. J. E. Hundley for complainant. M. F. Watts, E. B. Peirce, John G. Williams, Jas. C. Jeffery, Martin L. Clardy, and A. P. Burgwin for defendants. Dismissed for want of prosecution.

980. L. HAROLD FORD v. CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Household goods from Early, Iowa, to Walcott, Wyo. L. Harold Ford for complainant. John W. Baldwin and F. C. Dillard for defendant. Dismissed on motion of complainant; complainant satisfied.

986. WILLIAM L. YETTER WALL PAPER COMPANY ET AL. v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Classification of wall paper and hangings. E. J. McVann and John M. Guild for complainants. A. J. Briggs, W. D. McHigh, James E. Kelby, Elmer H. Wood, F. O. Becker, O. E. Butterfield, M. L. Bell, C. E. Gill, and William Ellis for defendants. October 8, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainants.

987. WILLIAM L. YETTER WALL PAPER COMPANY ET AL. v. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.-Classification of wall paper and hangings. William L. Yetter for complainants. A. P. Burgwin, F. J. Jerome, George F. Brownell, H. A. Taylor, Albert H. Harris, John G. Wilson, Edward Barton, and C. N. Travous for defendants. October 8, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainants.

990. CAMPBELL LUMBER COMPANY v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on lumber from Louisiana and Texas points to Ashley, Ill. W.S. Campbell for complainant. James Hagerman, Joseph Bryson, Ed. Baxter,, S. F. Andrews, S. H. West, James C. Jeffery, and Martin L. Clardy for defendants. April 1, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

1018. SLIGO IRON STORE COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on coal from Libby, Pa. to Potosi, Mo. C. D. Blake and C. Hirdler for complainant. Martin L. Clardy, Wm. Hodgdon, John G. Williams, and George Stuart Patterson for defendants. May 20, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

1022. PETER H. JACKSON & COMPANY v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on sidewalk glass from Ohio and Pennsylvania to Pacific coast. Peter H. Jackson for complainant. Gardiner Lathrop, Robert Dunlap, S. H. West, Wm. R. Begg, P. L. Williams, John G. Wilson, John W. Baldwin, E. B. Peirce, Edwin Barton, William F. Herrin, P. F. Dunne, W. W. Cotton, and D. A. Chambers for defendant. June 17, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

1026. RICHMOND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY.-Rates on coal to Richmond from West Virginia points. James R. Gordon for complainant. H. T. Wickham for defendant. July 1, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant. 1027. DAYTON RECEIVERS & SHIPPERS' ASSOCIATION v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on coal from the Virginias to Dayton, Ohio. Walter B. Moore for complainant. T. B. Harrison, jr., L. H. Hackney, Ed. Baxter, Joseph L. Doran, and H. T. Wickham for defendant. June 8, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant without prejudice.

1038. MCFARLAND & BLACK v. MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.-Rates on cantaloupes from Windsboro, Tex., to northern points. C. W. Durbin and W. L. Black for complainants. James Hagerman and Joseph M. Bryson for defendants. November 4, 1907. Dismissed at request of complainant.

1065. SCHWAGER & NETTLETON, INC., v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY.-Rates on dry fir lumber from Washington to North Dakota, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Austin E. Griffiths for complainant. C. W. Bunn for defendant. November 11, 1907. Dismissed on motion of complainant.

« PreviousContinue »