COMPLAINTS IN WHICH REPARATION WAS AUTHORIZED ON INFORMAL

PLEADINGS. JANUARY 1, 1907, TO NOVEMBER 30, 1907.

1. T. C. Keller & Company v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company. January 17, 1907. Refund of $54.34 on carload of coal shipped from Clinton, Ind., to Baroda, Mich., on account of excessive rate.

2. Eastern Tablet Company v. Mallory Steamship Company. February 16, 1907. Refund of $105 on shipment of paper tablets from Brownsville, N. Y., to Dallas, Tex., on account of excessive rate.

3. Miller-Vidor Lumber Company v. Texas & Pacific Railway Company. February 18, 1907. Refund of $11.80 on carload of lumber from Sodus, La., to Hallettsville, Tex., on account of misrouting.

4. Surrey Lumber Company v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. February 19, 1907. Refund of $3.75 on box of shooks from Wakefield, Va., to Westminster, Md., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

5. Phoenix Cotton Oil Company v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. February 19, 1907. Refund of $158.04 on 14 carloads of cotton seed from Corning and Newark, Ark., to Memphis, Tenn., on account of misconstruction of tariff.

6. Milwaukee Elevator Company v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. February 19, 1907. Refund of $84.63 on 2 carloads of barley shipped from Bushnell, S. Dak., to Milwaukee, Wis., on account of improper routing.

7. Pillsbury-Watkins Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. February 21, 1907. Refund of $354.73 on shipments of ties from Peoria, Ill., to Minneapolis, Minn., through error in publication of tariff.

8. E. D. Hamlin v. Iowa Central Railway Company. February 21, 1907. Refund of $68 on 2 carloads of oats from Vancleve, Iowa, to Kansas City, Mo., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

9. Rosebrook Coal Company v. Iowa Central Railway Company. February 21, 1907. Refund of $14.35 on carload of coal from Eddyville, Iowa, to Alden, Minn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

10. Macy Brothers v. Iowa Central Railway Company. February 21, 1907. Refund of $29.38 on carload of oats from Sully, Iowa, to Kansas City, Mo., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

11. Taylor Manufacturing Company v. Seaboard Air Line Railway. February 23, 1907. Refund of $14.37 on carload of cotton-seed hulls from Columbus, S. C., to Gastonia, N. C., on account of excessive charges.

12. D. E. Ryan Company and F. B. Scott Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. February 23, 1907. Refund of $14.88 and $53.10 on shipments of apples from Nebraska City, Nebr., to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of improper routing.

13. John S. Owen Lumber Company v. Wisconsin Central Railway Company. February 23, 1907. Refund of $16.35 on shipment of building stone from Portland, Conn., to Eau Claire, Wis., on account of charging less than carload rates instead of minimum carload rates.

14. E. P. Stacy & Sons v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. February 23, 1907. Refund of 4 cents per 100 pounds on 6 carloads of apples from Troy, Kans., to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

15. Rogers, Brown & Company v. Southern Railway Company. February 25, 1907. Refund of $40.50 on 2 carloads of pig iron from Sheffield, Ala., to Moberly, Mo., on account of clerical error in tariff schedule.

593

16. Hayward H. Kendall Company v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. February 25, 1907. Refund of $18.03 on shipment of coal from Lilly, Pa., to Cleveland, Ohio, for the purpose of adjusting excessive switching charges.

17. Holcomb Hayes Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. April 29, 1907. Refund of $555.50 on 70 carloads of ties from Hopkinsville, Ky., to Herrin and Pawnee Junction, Ill., on account of error in publication of rate schedule. 18. Spencer Lumber Company and Floete Lumber Company v. Iowa Central Railway Company. February 27, 1907. Refund of 3 cents per 100 pounds on shipment of 2 carloads of sewer pipe from Monmouth, Ill., to Spencer, Iowa, on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

19. Roswell Gas Company v. Pecos Valley & Northeastern Railway Company. March 2, 1907. Refund of $368.92 on shipment of crude oil from Chanute, Kans., to Roswell, N. Mex., on account of collection of local instead of joint through commodity rate.

20. Price Cereal Food Company v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company. March 2, 1907. Refund of $36.56 on shipment of flaked wheat from Owosso, Mich., to Fort Smith, Ark., on account of improper routing.

21. Archenhold & Company v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. March 2, 1907. Refund of $54.57 on shipments of whisky from Lynchburg, Ohio, to Waco, Tex., on account of improper routing by carrier's agent.

22. Yellow Pine Manufacturers' Association v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. March 4, 1907. Refund of $6.50 on carload of yellow pine lumber from Millville, Ark., to Belleville, Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

23. Shoal Creek Coal Company v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company. March 4, 1907. Refund of $74.67 on 12 carloads of coal from Panama, Ill., to Hannibal, Mo., Davenport, Dubuque, Keokuk, and Fort Madison, Iowa, on account of excessive charges.

24. M. Wolf & Sons v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. March 4, 1907. Refund of $17.10 on shipment of 100 bales of imported cotton waste from Boston, Mass., to Fall River, Mass. on account of excessive charges. 25. William Whitner & Sons v. Central of Georgia Railway Company. March 4, 1907. Refund of $12.36 on carload of cypress lumber from Bellwood, Ala., to Philadelphia, Pa., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

26. Union Oil Company v. Texas & Pacific Railway Company. March 9, 1907. Refund of $262.24 on 6 carloads of crude cotton-seed oil from Bunkie, La., to Memphis, Tenn., on account of excessive charges in connection with refining in transit privilege.

27. Weber Implement Company v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. March 11, 1907. Refund of $7.27 on shipment of corn huskers from Milwaukee, Wis., to Red Bud., Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent. 28. The Mathieson Alkali Works v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. March 12, 1907. Refund of $128.74 on 2 carloads of soda ash from Saltville, Va., to Denver, Colo., on account of excessive charges.

29. Southern Bitulithic Company v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Company. March 13, 1907. Refund of $335.62 on 43 carloads of riprap from Cedar Bluff, Ky., to Baton Rouge, La., on account of excessive charges.

30. Georgetown & Western Railroad Company v. Southern Railway Company. March 10, 1907. Refund of $35 on carload of stoves from Atlanta, Ga., to Georgetown, S. C., on account of adjustment of erroneous excessive charge.

31. American Tobacco Company v. Durham & Southern Railway Company. March 14, 1907. Refund of $132.41 on shipment of smoking tobacco from Durham, N. C., to Denver, Colo., on account of error in publication of tariff.

32. R. F. Hodges v. Wisconsin Central Railway Company. March 14, 1907. Refund of $20.85 on carload of lumber from Butternut, Wis., to Rockford, Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

33. Stetson, Cutler & Company v. Quebec Central Railway Company. March 15, 1907. Refund of $275.40 on 12 carloads of lumber from Dudswell Junction, Quebec, to Katonah and White Plains, N. Y., on account of excessive charges.

34. Sale-Blackledge-Nellis Company v. Vandalia Railroad Company. March 16, 1907. Refund of $73.39 on 5 carloads of canned tomatoes from Effingham,

35. Wallace Grain Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. March 16, 1907. Refund of $17.67 on carload of salt from Superior, Wis., to Walace, S. Dak., on account of collection of local combination instead of through rate.

36. W. W. Truby & Company v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. March 16, 1907. Refund of $11.27 on carload of broom corn from Englewood, Kans., to Mattoon, Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent. 37. Barrett Manufacturing Company v. Chicago Great Western Railway Company. March 16, 1907. Refund of $32.62 on carload of roofing paper from Chicago, Ill., to Lexington, Nebr., on account of collection of joint through rate in excess of combination of local rates.

38. Rogers Brown & Company v. Southern Railway Company. March 22, 1907. Refund of $64.91 on 24 carloads of pig iron from Sheffield, Ala., to Burlington, N. J., via Norfolk, Va., on account of illegal storage charges.

39. C. A. Bonds v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Company. March 22, 1907. Refund of $25 on 4 carloads of shingles from Monroe, La., to Meridian, Miss., on account of clerical error in construction of tariff.

40. Blaisdell Milling Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. March 22, 1907. Cancellation of local charges and to apply joint through rail and lake rates.

41. Crystal Paper Company v. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company. March 23, 1907. Refund of $55.20 on carload of wrapping paper from Middletown, Ohio, to Boston, Mass., on account of erroneous cancellation of rate.

42. Yegen Brothers v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. March 23, 1907. Refund of $112.87 on carload of rice from Estherwood, La., to Billings, Mont., on account of excessive charge.

43. American Hoist & Derrick Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. March 23, 1907. Refund of $18.35 on carload of hoisting machinery from St. Paul, Minn., to Wiggins, Miss., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

44. S. A. Foster Lumber Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. March 23, 1907. Refund of $24 on carload of pine laths from Gordon Siding, Mont., to Havelock, Nebr., on account of adjustment of minimum carload regulation.

45. Thomas H. Argall v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company. March 25, 1907. Refund of $73.38 on 2 carloads of iron bog ore from Champlain, Quebec, to Erie, Pa., on account of error in publication of rate.

46. James Quirk Milling Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. March 25, 1907. Refund of $20.67 on carload of flour from Montgomery, Minn., to Merrill, Wis., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

47. Albert Dickinson Company v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. March 16, 1907. Refund of $60.10 on carload of popcorn from Chicago, Ill., to Denver, Colo., on account of adjustment of excessive through rate.

48. Moore & Munger v. Southern Railway Company. March 23, 1907. Refund of $89.46 on 3 carloads of clay from Warrenville, S. C., to Lyons Falls, N. Y., on account of excessive charges.

49. Ryland & Brooks Lumber Company v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company and Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. March 23, 1907. Refund of $33.13 on 2 carloads of lumber from Ford, Va., to Brooklyn, Md., on account of error in tariff.

50. Carney, Brande & Clark v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. March 25, 1907. Refund of $606.99 on 21 carloads of poles from Black Duck and Funkley, Minn., to Omaha, Nebr., on account of excessive rates.

51. James A. Smith v. Iowa Central Railway Company. March 25, 1907. Refund of $118.81 on 2 carloads of coal from Albia, Iowa, to Vivian, S. Dak., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

52. Clark Coal & Coke Company v. Iowa Central Railway Company. March 25, 1907. Refund of $34.11 on carload of coal from Bartlett, Ill., to Henderson, Minn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

53. E. P. Stacy & Sons v. Company. March 25, 1907.

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Refund of $11.50 on carload of apples from Troy, Kans., to St. Paul, Minn., on account of excessive rates.

54. Ryland & Brooks Lumber Company v. Seaboard Air Line Railway. March 30, 1907. Refund of $18.21 on carload of lumber from Sanford, N. C., to Baltimore, Md., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

55. Mount Airy Furniture Company v. Southern Railway Company. April 2, 1907. Refund of $32.40 on carload of furniture from Mount Airy, N. C., to Turtle Creek, Pa., on account of excessive rates.

56. D. B. Sweet & Company v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. March 30, 1907. Refund of $12 on carload of flour in barrels from New York, N. Y., to New Haven, Conn., on account of excessive rates.

57. Anderson-Tully Company v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Company. April 3, 1907. Refund of $23.70 on carload of box material from Vicksburg, Miss., to Monroe, La., on account of excessive rates.

58. H. A. Dreves Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. March 29, 1907. Refund of $331.83 on 7 carloads of crushed oyster shells from Savannah, Ga., to Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minn., on account of excessive rates.

59. American Tobacco Company v. Durham & Southern Railway Company. April 5, 1907. Refund of $115.92 on shipment of smoking tobacco from Durham, N. C., to Denver, Colo., on account of error in publication of tariff.

60. Barrett Manufacturing Company v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. April 5, 1907. Refund of $8.13 on carload of wrapping paper from Chicago, Ill., to Winona, Minn., on account of error in publishing rate.

61. Sandoval Zinc Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. April 5, 1907. Refund of $30 on 2 carloads of zinc ore from Marion, Ky., to Sandoval, Ill., on account of clerical error in publishing rate.

62. Abilene Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. April 10, 1907. Refund of $2.16 on shipments of mineral water from Abilene, Kans., to Omaha, Nebr., on account of excessive charge.

63. Lange Canning Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. April 5, 1907. Refund of $6.08 on shipment of carload of canned corn from Eau Claire, Wis., to Pueblo, Colo., on account of excessive charges.

64. Goff-Kirby Coal Company v. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company. April 10, 1907. Refund of $597.82 on 71 carloads of coal from Branchton, Pa., to Detroit, Mich., on account of excessive rates.

65. Goemann Grain Company v. Wisconsin Central Railway Company. April 8, 1907. Refund of $128.32 on shipment of 10 carloads of oats from Fairchild, Wis., to Manitowoc, Wis., on account of excessive rates.

66. Armour Packing Company v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company. April 12, 1907. Refund of $69.58 on carload of cotton-seed oil from Paris, Ark., to Kansas City, Mo., on account of excessive charge.

April

67. Wm. Volker & Company v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. 18, 1907. Refund of $28.78 on 2 carloads of linoleum from Philadelphia, Pa., to Kansas City, Mo., on account of excessive rate.

68. J. H. Arnold & Company v. Southern Railway Company. April 18, 1907. Refund of $54.78 on carload of cotton from Gadsden, Ala., to Hudson, N. C., on account of excessive rate.

69. Humbird Lumber Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. April 15, 1907. Refund of $45 on 2 carloads of pine lumber from Sand Point, Idaho, to McClusky, S. Dak., on account of oversight in publication of rate.

70. Acworth Cotton Manufacturing Company v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company. April 18, 1907. Refund of $285.50 on 15 carloads of machinery from Lowell, Mass., to Acworth, Ga., on account of oversight in publication of rate.

71. W. M. Ritter Lumber Company v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. April 19, 1907. Refund of $2.70 on carload of lumber from Panther, W. Va., to Punxsutawney, Pa., on account of excessive rate.

72. Beatrice Corn Mills v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. April 19, 1907. Refund of $198 on carload of brewer's grits from Beatrice, Nebr., to San Francisco, Cal., and diverted on account of the earthquake to Vancouver, Wash., on

73. W. E. Demond v. Central Vermont Railway Company. April 20, 1907. Refund of $9.89 on 3 cars of cord wood from Stratford, Conn., to Springfield, Mass., on account of excessive rate.

74. Acme Storage Company v. Southern Railway Company. April 22, 1907. Refund of $54.80 on 2 carloads of tale from Glendon, N. C., to Chicago, Ill., on account of error in publication of rate.

75. California Sugar & White Pine Agency v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. April 24, 1907. Refund of $4 on carload of doors from San Francisco, Cal., to Kansas City, Mo., on account of improper exaction of demurrage charge.

76. Powhatan Coal & Coke Company v. Buffalo & Susquehanna Railroad Company. April 22, 1907. Refund of $5,359.25 on 152 carloads of coke from Sykes, Pa., to West Seneca, N. Y., on account of excessive charge.

77. National Manufacturing Company v. Toledo St. Louis & Western Railway Company. April 19, 1907. Refund of $22.74 on carload of staves from New

Bavaria, Ohio, to Sterling, Ill., on account of excessive charge.

78. Listman Mill Company v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. April 20, 1907. Refund of $503 on 25 carloads of bran from Minneapolis, Minn., to Lacrosse, Wis., on account of oversight in construction of rate schedule.

79. C. W. Hull Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. April 22, 1907. Refund of $12.15 on carload of coal from Carterville, Ill., to Greenville, Iowa, thence reconsigned to Sheldon, Iowa, on account of improper reconsignment charges.

80. Newaygo Portland Cement Company v. Wisconsin Central Railway Company. April 22, 1907. Refund of $101.95 on 5 carloads of cement from Newaygo, Mich., to Grand Rapids, Wis., on account of excessive charge.

81. C. B. Havens & Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. April 22, 1907. Refund of $81.88 on carload of coal from Chicago, Ill., to Boise, Idaho, on account of excessive charge.

82. Champion Coated Paper Company v. Cincinati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company. April 23, 1907. Refund of $314 on 20 carloads of paper from Hamilton, Ohio, to Baltimore, Md., New York, N. Y., and Boston, Mass., on account of excessive charge.

83. Franklin Sugar Refining Company v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. April 23, 1907. Refund of $20.25 on carload of sirup from Philadelphia, Pa., to St. Louis, Mo., on account of error of carrier's agent.

84. C. F. Keck & Company v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company and Norfolk & Western Railway Company. April 23, 1907. Refund of $35.75 on 2 carloads of feed from Roxbury, Md., to Norfolk, Va., on account of excessive charge.

85. Baker Brothers & Company v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. April 24, 1907. Refund of $28.60 on carload of glass bottles from Sheffield, Pa., to Lynchburg, Va., on account of excessive charge.

86. Muskogee Oil Refining Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. April 23, 1907. Refund of $87.83 on carload of oil from Muskogee, Ind. T., to Little Rock, Ark., on account of excessive charge.

87. Independent Elevator Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. April 25, 1907. Refund of $217.71 on 4 carloads of coal from Duluth, Minn., to Crocker, S. Dak., on account of excessive charge.

88. Tennessee Valley Fertilizer Company v. Southern Railway Company. October 5, 1907. Refund of $1,437.62 on 81 carloads of fertilizer from Florence, Ala., to various points in Tennessee, on account of clerical error in publication of rate schedule.

89. Southern Bitulithic Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. April 25, 1907. Refund of $57.84 on carload of paving cement from Carthage, Ohio, to Baton Rouge, La., on account of excessive charge.

90. Oxford Copper Company v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company. April 25, 1907. Refund of $90.11 on 8 carloads of soda ash from Solvay, N. Y., to Hoboken, N. J., on account of oversight in publication of rate