Page images
PDF
EPUB

91. F. J. Zilla & Company v. Great Northern Railway Company. May 3, 1907. Refund of $7.76 on carload of wire and nails from Chicago, Ill., to Hutchinson, Minn., on account of excessive charge.

92. B. Presley Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. May 3, 1907. Refund of $60 on carload of flour from Orrville, Shuburt, and Falls City, Nebr., to St. Paul, Minn., on account of oversight in connection with publication of rate.

93. Orrville Milling Company v. Cleveland, Akron & Columbus Railway Company. May 3, 1907. Refund of $60 on a carload of flour from Orrville, Ohio, to Alexandria, Va., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

94. Crosby Roller Milling Company v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. May 3, 1907. Refund of $3.07 on carload of flour from Topeka, Kans., to Modesto, Ill., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

95. New Prague Flouring Mill Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. April 11, 1907. Refund of $10.68 on 2 carloads of flour from New Prague, Minn., to Rice Lake and Cameron, Wis., on account of excessive through rate.

96. R. P. Burnett v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. May 2, 1907. Refund of $19.83 on carload of stone from Albion, N. Y., to Cleveland, Ohio, on account of excessive through rate.

97. Northern Ohio Paving & Construction Company v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. May 2, 1907. Refund of $192.31 on 7 carloads of stone from Albion and Eagle Harbor, N. Y., to Cleveland, Ohio, on account of excessive through rate.

98. George B. Herring & Son v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. May 2, 1907. Refund of $127.59 on 6 carloads of block stone from Albion and Eagle Harbor, N. Y., to Cleveland, Ohio, on account of excessive through rate.

99. Southern Cotton Oil Company v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad Company. May 3, 1907. Refund of $41.83 on carload of cooking fat from New Orleans, La., to Fort Wayne, Ind., on account of excessive through rate. 100. George J. Kindel v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. May 4, 1907. Refund of $2.77 on 2 bales of domestic cheviots from Greensboro, N. C., to Denver, Colo., on account of excessive through rate.

101. J. H. Furman v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. May 6, 1907. Refund of $139.83 on 52 casks of muriate of ammonia from Antwerp, Belgium, and shipped by the Illinois Central Railroad from New Orleans, La., to Chicago, Ill., on account of error in routing by custom-house broker.

102. William Volker & Company v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. May 6, 1907. Refund of $21 on carload of shade rollers from Hammond, Ind., to Denver, Colo., by way of Chicago, on account of excessive through rate.

103. Simon Cook Company v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company. May 8, 1907. Refund of $6 on carload of scrap iron from Delphos, Ohio, to Fort Wayne, Ind., on account of excessive rate.

104. Cleveland Trinidad Paving Company v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. May 4, 1907, refund of $68.92; May 6, 1907, refund of $97.77; May 6, 1907, refund of $1,243.34; all on shipments of stone from Albion and Medina, N. Y., to Cleveland, Ohio, on account of excessive through rates.

105. Northwest Thresher Company v. Great Northern Railway Company. May 7, 1907. Refund of $27.61 on 2 carloads of thrashing machinery from Stillwater, Minn., to Brandon, Manitoba, on account of oversight in publication of tariff.

106. New England Granite Works v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. May 9, 1907. Refund of $5.57 on granite monument from West Quincy, Mass., to Bridgeport, Conn., on account of excessive rate.

107. Newton Oil & Manufacturing Company v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad Company and Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Company. May 11, 1907. Refund of $205.92 on 18 carloads of kainit from Fort Chalmette, La., to Newton, Miss., on account of excessive rate.

108. International Forwarding Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Com

Antwerp, Belgium, by way of New Orleans, to Chicago, Ill., on account of error in publication of tariff.

109. E. L. Hedstrom & Company v. Southern Indiana Railway Company. May 17, 1907. Refund of $15 on 5 carloads of coal from Coalmont, Ind., to Chicago, Ill., on account of improper switching charge.

110. Max Atlass v. Wabash Railroad Company. May 6, 1907. Refund of $113.54 on 8 carloads of ice from Madison, Wis., to Decatur, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

111. Milne Lumber Company v. Wabash Railroad Company. May 6, 1907. Refund of $9.56 on carload of lumber from St. Louis, Mo., to Blockton, Iowa, on account of excessive rate.

112. United States Leather Company v. Wabash Railroad Company. May 6, 1907. Refund of $204.45 on 5 carloads of hides from Fort Worth, Tex., to Marlinton, W. Va., on account of excessive rate.

113. Milwaukee Worsted Mills v. Wabash Railroad Company. May 6, 1907. Refund of $78.63 on 8 carloads of wood from St. Louis, Mo., to Milwaukee, Wis., on account of improper minimum carload charge.

114. Nichols-Chisolm Lumber Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. August 19, 1907. Refund of $11.26 on carload of lumber from Frazee, Minn., to Waukegan, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

115. W. B. Northrup & Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. May 14, 1907. Refund of $121.65 on 2 carloads of apples from Bracken, Nebr., to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of excessive rate.

116. American Glue Company v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. May 20, 1907. Refund of $10.50 on carload of glue stock from Danbury, Conn., to Springdale, Pa., on account of excessive rate.

117. Upham & Agler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. May 18, 1907. Refund of $11.05 on carload of lumber from Kelso, Mo., to Cairo, Ill., on account of mistake in quoting rate.

118. New Orleans Acid & Fertilizer Company v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Company. August 6, 1907. Refund of $35 on carload of fertilizer from New Orleans, La., to Stamps, Ark., on account of excessive through rate.

119. Northwestern Washed Coal Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. May 18, 1907. Refund of $3.86 on carload of coal from East St. Louis, Ill., to Omaha, Nebr., on account of excessive rate.

120. Bessemer Washed Coal Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. May 18, 1907. Refund of $82.55 on 11 carloads of coal from East St. Louis, Ill., to Omaha, Nebr., on account of excessive rate.

121. Red River Lumber Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. May 20, 1907. Refund of $33.65 on 3 carloads of lumber from Ackley, Minn., to Leola, S. Dak., on account of excessive rate.

122. Gamble-Robinson Commission Company v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. May 21, 1907. Refund of $27.20 on carload of melons from Coan, Iowa, to Mankato, Minn., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

123. W. W. Sivright v. Great Northern Railway Company. May 23, 1907. Refund of $9.38 on carload of wire and nails from Chicago, Ill., to Hutchinson, Minn., on account of excessive through rate.

124. Crookston Lumber Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. May 22, 1907. Refund of $108.93 on 5 carloads of lumber from Bermidji, Minn., to Garrison, N. Dak., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

125. Cudahy Packing Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. May 24, 1907. Refund of $62.40 on carload of lard oil from South Omaha, Nebr., consigned to San Francisco and diverted in transit to Seattle, Wash., on account of diversion of shipment.

126. Crocker Brothers v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. May 23, 1907. Refund of $10 on carload of pig iron from Fox Point, R. I., to Warren, R. I., on account of excessive rate.

127. Crocker Brothers v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. May 23, 1907. Refund of $148.10 on 20 carloads of pig iron from Fox Point, R. I., to Whitens, Mass., on account of excessive rate.

128. Woonsocket Machine & Press Company v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. May 23, 1907. Refund of $58.31 on 17 carloads of pig iron from Fox Point, R. I., to Woonsocket, R. I., on account of excessive rate.

129. E. Arthur Tutein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. May 24, 1907. Refund of $50 on carload of pig iron from Fox Point, R. I., to Taunton, Mass., and on car of pig iron from Fox Point, R. I., to Weir, Mass., on account of excessive rate.

130. Ostrander Fire Brick Company v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. May 24, 1907. Refund of $12.58 on carload of fire clay from Perth Amboy, N. J., to Bellows Falls, Vt., on account of excessive rate.

131. J. A. Miller & Company v. Manistee & Northeastern Railroad Company. May 27, 1907. Refund of $88.33 on 2 carloads of potatoes from Glengarry, Mich.. to Chicago, IH., on account of technical failure in issuing tariff.

132. Northwest Lumber Company v. Great Northern Railway Company. May 28, 1907. Refund of $23.04 on carload of lumber from Bagley, Minn., to Divide, N. Dak., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

133. American Sugar Refining Company v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad Company. May 29, 1907. Refund of $46.01 on carload of sugar from New Orleans, La., to Dotham, Ala., on account of excessive rate.

134. American Sugar Refining Company v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad Company. May 29, 1907. Refund of $54.90 on carload of sugar from New Orleans, La., to Troy, Ala., on account of excessive rate.

135. Julius Porath v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. May 31, 1907. Refund of $79.74 on 3 carloads of stone from Albion and Eagle Harbor, N. Y., to West Detroit, Mich., on account of excessive through rate.

136. Pennsylvania & Delaware Oil Company v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey. May 31, 1907. Refund of $4.62 on carload of lubricating oil from Bayonne, N. J., to Easton, Pa., on account of excessive rate.

137. Greif Brothers Company v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company and Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company. May 22, 1907. Refund of $35.48 on carload of staves from Cleveland, Ohio, to Janesville, Wis., on account of excessive through rate.

138. McCarthy & Lardie v. Manistee & Northeastern Railroad Company. May 27, 1907. Refund of $265.02 on 10 carloads of potatoes from Buckley, Mich., to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

139. Menomonee Hydraulic Press Brick Company v. Great Northern Railway Company. May 27, 1907. Refund of $3.04 on carload of cement from Superior Lock, Wis., to Watertown, S. Dak., on account of error in publication of tariff. 140. L. Teweles & Company v. Ahnapee & Western Railroad Company and Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. June 3, 1907. Refund of $23.39 on 200 bags of dried peas from Sawyer, Wis., to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

141. Quinn Marshall & Company v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company. May 31, 1907. Refund of $0.63 on shipment of hosiery from Doylestown, Pa., to Lynchburg, Va., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

142. Walter Cooper v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. April 26, 1907. Refund of $207.20 on 8 carloads of pine laths from Gordon Siding, Mont., to various destinations on account of adjustment of minimum weight regulations.

143. E. W. Barley & Company v. Central Vermont Railway Company. June 6, 1907. Application of 20 cents per 100 pounds instead of 26 cents per 100 pounds in making settlement with its connecting carriers on a shipment of 40,000 pounds of merchandise which had been misrouted.

144. Little River Lumber Company v. Southern Railway Company. June 6, 1907. Refund of $102.11 on 7 carloads of lumber from Townsend, Tenn., to Cincinnati, Ohio, on account of oversight in publication of tariff.

145. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. June 6, 1907. Refund of $164.76 on 8 carloads of sand from Klondike, Mo., to Kansas City, Mo., on account of error in publication of tariff.

146. Sanger Brothers v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. June 6, 1907. Refund of $58.63 on carload of oilcloth from Rock Island, Ill., to Dallas,

147. Simmons Manufacturing Company v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. June 6, 1907. Refund of $40.40 on shipment of furniture from Kenosha, Wis., to Springfield, Mo., on account of misapplication of minimum carload weight.

148. Carpenter & Boxley v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. June 8, 1907. Refund of $154.80 on 2 shipments of contractor's outfit from Bluefield, W. Va., to Johnson City, Tenn., on account of excessive rate.

149. Carpenter & Boxley v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. June 8, 1907. Refund of $89.40 on 2 shipments of contractor's outfit from Ingleside, W. Va., to Johnson City, Tenn., on account of excessive rate.

150. C. C. Boxley v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. June 15, 1907. Refund of $20.23 on carload of potatoes from Fremont, Nebr., to Paola, Kans., on account of excessive through rate.

151. Myles Salt Company v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Company. June 15, 1907. Refund of $85.02 on carload of salt from Weeks Island, La., to Grand Saline, Tex., on account of excessive rate.

152. McNeill Pressed Brick Company v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. June 7, 1907. Refund of $31.61 on carload of brick from Chicago Heights, Ill., to Valley Park, Mo., on account of excessive through class rate.

153. E. M. Wilhoit v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. June 14, 1907. Refund of amount paid on shipments of refined oil from Erie, Kans., to Joplin, Mo., in excess of 15 cents per 100 pounds on account of error made by carrier's agent in the application of rate.

154. Blackwell Milling & Elevator Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. June 7, 1907. Refund of $14.65 on carload of flour from Tulsa to Broken Arrow, Ind. T., on account of illegal arbitrary charge.

155. American Bottle Company v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. June 12, 1907. Refund of $15.86 on 2 carloads of bottles from Streator, Ill., to Ortonville, Minn., on account of excessive through rate.

156. Raeford Power & Manufacturing Company v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railway Company. June 18, 1907. Refund of $18.24 on 3 shipments of yarn from Raeford, N. C., to Philadelphia, Pa., on account of excessive rate.

157. Sligo Iron Store Company v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. June 18, 1907. Refund of $6.06 on carload of coal from Chicago, Ill., to Cody, Wyo., on account of excessive rate.

158. Western Tin Plate & Sheet Company v. Vandalia Railroad Company. June 25, 1907. Refund of $64.12 on 3 carloads of sheet iron from Greencastle, Ind., to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of excessive rate.

159. Amarillo Ice & Cold Storage Company v. Pecos Valley & Northeastern Railway Company. June 14, 1907. Refund of $1,553.88 on 7 carloads of fuel oil from Chanute, Kans., to Amarillo, Tex., on account of excessive rate.

160. W. B. Bradley Company v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company. June 21, 1907. Refund of $581.53 on 18 carloads of limestone from Hummelstown, Pa., to New Village, N. J., on account of excessive rate.

161. Brighton Stock Yard Company v. Boston & Albany Railroad Company. June 20, 1907. Refund of $44.64 on 6 shipments of saco dust from Plymouth, N. H., to Brighton, Mass., on account of excessive switching charge.

162. Sligo Iron Store Company v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. June 20, 1907. Refund of $4.21 on carload of coal from Chicago, Ill., to Cody, Wyo., on account of excessive rate.

163. Little River Lumber Company v. Southern Railway Company. June 20, 1907. Refund of $29.16 on 2 carloads of lumber from Townsend, Tenn., to Cincinnati, Ohio, on account of oversight in publication of tariff schedules.

164. B. Presley Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. June 24, 1907. Refund of $349.31 on 12 carloads of apples from Shubert, Rulo, and Falls City, Nebr., to St. Paul, Minn., on account of excessive rate.

165. Shoal Creek Coal Company v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company. June 18, 1907. Refund of $11.28 on shipment of coal from Panama, Ill., to Hannibal, Mo., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

166. Works Biscuit Company v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company. June 15, 1907. Refund of $20.07 on shipment of wrapping paper from Niles, Mich., to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of excessive class rate.

167. Perry Mills Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. June 15, 1907. Refund of $110.92 on 8 carloads of flour and bran between various points in Oklahoma and Indian Territory on account of illegal arbitrary charge.

168. Southern Cement Company v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company. June 20, 1907. Refund of $40.40 on carload of cement from Birmingham, Ala., to New Iberia, La., on account of excessive through rate.

169. Barns & Mauk v. Wisconsin Central Railroad Company. June 21, 1907. Refund of $21.21 on shipment of shingles from Sergo Quarry, Wash., to Boonville, Ind., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

170. Portland Flour & Meal Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. June 25, 1907. Refund of $7.70 on carload of flour from Spokane, Wash., to Clarks Fork, Idaho, on account of adjustment of minimum carload weight.

171. Highland Iron & Steel Company v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company. June 24, 1907. Refund of $26.30 on carload of bar iron from Terre Haute, Ind., to Fairfield, Iowa, on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

172. Plansifter Milling Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. June 22, 1907. Refund of $29.91 on 2 carloads of grain product from McAlester, Ind. T., to Carbon, Ind. T., on account of excessive rate.

173. Simonds-Shields Grain Company v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company. June 27, 1907. Refund of $650.62 on 59 carloads of wheat from Kansas City, Mo., to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive milling-in-transit charge.

174. Goodyear Lumber Company v. Buffalo & Susquehanna Railroad Company. May 17, 1907. Refund of $170.70 on 10 carloads of lumber from points on defendant's line to Newark, N. J., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

175. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. July 17, 1907. Refund of $36.29 on carload of nails, wire, and fencing from St. Paul, Minn., to Sentinel Butte, N. Dak., on account of excessive through rate.

176. Gideon-Anderson Lumber & Mercantile Company v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company. June 21, 1907. Refund of $4.30 on shipment of baled hay from Decatur, Ind., to Gideon, Mo., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

177. Arnold-Evans Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. July 8, 1907. Refund of $90.50 on carload of heating apparatus from Chicago, Ill., to Sprague, Wash., on account of excessive through rate.

178. In the matter of the relief of certain agents of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. July 3, 1907. Refund of $653.24 on shipments of apples from various points of origin to various destinations on account of adjustment of minimum carload weight.

179. Duluth Iron & Metal Company v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. July 6, 1907. Refund of $324.23 on 5 carloads of scrap rails from Hawthorne, Wis., to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

180. In the matter of the relief of the agent of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company at Minneapolis. July 8, 1907. Refund of $20.90 on shipment of sleighs from Wayne, Mich., to Minneapolis, Minn., on account of excessive through rate.

181. American Car & Foundry Company v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company. June 26, 1907. Refund of $1,198.40 on 20 carloads of steel car frames from Berwick, Pa., to Chicago, Ill., on account of excessive rate.

182. Wm. Parr & Company v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company. July 3, 1907. Refund of $16 on shipment of cement from Galveston, Tex., to Columbus, Nebr., on account of misrouting by carrier's agent.

183. Carolina Portland Cement Company v. Alabama Great Southern Rail

« PreviousContinue »