TON PER MILE RATE-Continued. the same or adjacent lines in the immediate territory where the same conditions exist are of much greater significance and afford a much more accurate basis for the Commission's action. Dallas Freight Bureau v. G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. 223. TRADE CENTERS. In a territory under the basing-point system, rates to a complaining point made by a combination of the through rate to the nearest trade center and the local beyond need not, under the construction of the fourth section of the act by the Supreme Court, be reduced to the basis of every neighboring point of like distance, when the other points have the advantage of water or other competition. Commerical & Industrial Asso. of Union Springs v. L. & N. R. Co. 372. Grown up with Texas system. Dallas Freight Bureau v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. 427. Rate from intermediate point higher by local from trade center, not condemned. Durham v. I. C. R. Co. 37. Moultrie, Ga., entitled to be considered as. Co. 229. Southern Grocery Co. v. G. N. Ry. The act does not bar a carrier from providing for costs of transfer in making delivery to a certain carrier, but if it so provides, it must publish and file a tariff showing where the transfer will be made, the kind of transfer service re quired, and the charges to be exacted therefor. Schwager & Nettleton v. G. N. Ry. Co. 521. A shipper is entitled to notice of a transfer charge other than one coming to him through the collection of the charge from his consignee, and as he is not obliged to follow his shipment and make the transfer himself, he is entitled to the protection afforded by a published definite rate. Id. A carrier can not excuse the collection of an unpublished and unknown drayage and transfer charge by proof that it had a rule which forbade the sending of its own cars beyond its own line during a period of car shortage and congestion of business, especially where no notice of the rule, either actually or by reference in a published tariff, had been brought to the shipper. Id. Grain, Council Bluffs to Omaha. A rate of 1 cent per 100 pounds, minimum charge $5 per car, for transferring grain in carloads from Council Bluffs, Iowa, to Omaha and South Omaha, Nebr., defendant's rate for service in reverse direction, for delivery upon its own tracks, being $2 per car; made to induce construction and maintenance of a modern and capacious elevator on its line in Council Bluffs; a higher rate being charged on grain transferred to Council Bluffs for delivery to elevators or industries on other lines; the delivery of grain by defendant in Omaha or South Omaha being for industries or elevators on other lines for which, under car-service rules, it must allow such other lines $2 per diem rental; the grain rates from the west to Omaha, South Omaha, and Council Bluffs being the same, and the rates from the east to Council Bluffs being less-under all the circumstances and conditions is not unjust and unreasonable. Omaha Grain Exchange v. Un. Pac. R. Co. 65. TRANSFER COMPANIES. Not subject to act. Re Right of Railroad Companies to Exchange Transportation, 39. TRUCKING FIRM. No unreasonable preference shown to, by carrier. New York Team Owners UNIFORM CLASSIFICATION. Efforts to agree upon. Paper Mills Co. v. Pa. R. Co. 438. UNLAWFUL DEVICE. Carrier or carrier's agent acting as forwarding or reconsigning agent for ship- UNREASONABLE RATES. See also CONCESSIONS; DISCRIMINATION; EXPRESS Can not be imposed upon shipper by reason of contracts which an express com- Unusually high rate charged for special and expedited service not reasonable Amarillo, Tex. Class rates from Kansas City to, as compared with those Augusta, Ga. 41 cents per 100 pounds on cotton waste in bales, to New York Augusta suburban points. Class rates from North Atlantic ports to suburban Cleburne, Tex. 27 and 29 cents per 100 pounds on cotton seed in carloads Columbus, Ohio. Express rate of $350 per car for horses to Kansas City and Coolidge, Lakin, Garden City, Cimarron and Dodge City, Kans. Coal to, from Cullman, Ala. 22 cents per 100 pounds on shipments of salt to, in carloads Enid, Okla. Coal to, from San Bois district, Ind. T., 225 miles average dis- Enid, Okla. Coal to, from Henryetta district, Ind. T., 180 miles, of $1.95 for UNREASONABLE RATES-Continued. Frederick, Md. Class rate of $3.80 per ton on brick, carloads, to Elberon, Granite Falls, Minn. Rate of 56 cents per 100 pounds on butter and eggs in Kansas points. See COOLIDGE, supra. Macon and Atlanta, Ga. Rate of 81 cents on peaches from, to Philadelphia Marquette and Phillips, Nebr. 75 cents per 100 pounds on wheat to California New Mexico points, see RoSWELL, infra. New York City. Rates on cut flowers from New Jersey and Pennsylvania Oklahoma City, Okla. 28 cents per 100 pounds on wheat from, to Gaines- Pemberton, N. J. Through rate to, on grain, flour and feed, carloads, from Plano, Tex. 45 cents on cotton seed in carloads from Marietta, Okla., un- Quanah, Tex. 18 cents per 100 pounds on cement plaster to St. Louis, Mo., Roswell, Artesia, Hagerman, and Carlsbad, N. Mex. Class rates to, from St. Paul, Minn. Grass twine and matting, St. Paul to Boston. Rate of 62 UNREASONABLE RATES-Continued. Wichita, Kans. 96 cents on cotton goods from producing points in Texas, com- Wichita, Kans. 96 cents on cotton goods from producing points in Texas, com- VALUE OF SERVICE. As measure of rate. Society of American Florists v. U. S. Express Co. 120. WASTE. See COTTON WASTE. WATER COMPETITION. Transcontinental. Enterprise Manufacturing Co. v. Ga. R. Co. 130. Exists at Decatur, Ala. Farmers Warehouse Co. v. L. & N. R. Co. 457, 520. WATER RATES. See also LAKE AND RAIL RATES; OCEAN RATES; RAIL AND Warren Manufacturing Co. v. Ga. R. Co. 381. WEAK AND STRONG ROADS. The defendant road being unfinished, without through connections, not ex- WEIGHING ASSOCIATION. Leonard v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. 538. WEIGHTS. See also ESTIMATED WEIGHTS; MINIMUM WEIGHTS. Cotton goods, baled. Enterprise Mfg. Co. v. Ga. R. Co. 451. Reparation awarded for error in weight of coal. Leonard v. M., K. & T. Ry. WHEAT. See also GRAIN. Kansas to California. Howard Mills Co. v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. 258. Ponca City Mill Co. v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. 26. Poor Grain Co. v. C., B. & Q. Ry. Co. 418. Mitchell v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. 324. WHISKY. Manufacture and transportation. Railroad Commission of Oregon v. C. & A. |