Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81Soney and Sage, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 71
Page 97
... crossing was defective or out of repair . We think the declaration sufficient in this respect for two reasons - first , because it avers that the condi- tion existed for three years prior to the accident . That aver- ment raises a ...
... crossing was defective or out of repair . We think the declaration sufficient in this respect for two reasons - first , because it avers that the condi- tion existed for three years prior to the accident . That aver- ment raises a ...
Page 142
... crossing signal ( Pamph . L. 1903. p . 663 ) consisted solely in the testimony of a witness who said that he did not hear it , coupled with a statement that on account of a strong wind one could scarcely hear any sound , and there being ...
... crossing signal ( Pamph . L. 1903. p . 663 ) consisted solely in the testimony of a witness who said that he did not hear it , coupled with a statement that on account of a strong wind one could scarcely hear any sound , and there being ...
Page 143
... crossing signal by whistle was given was the subject of the positive testimony of both engineer and fireman . The plaint- iff's evidence is , " I did not hear any bell or whistle . There was a very strong wind that morning from the west ...
... crossing signal by whistle was given was the subject of the positive testimony of both engineer and fireman . The plaint- iff's evidence is , " I did not hear any bell or whistle . There was a very strong wind that morning from the west ...
Page 144
... crossing . ” It was admitted that a clear view of two thousand feet was obtainable at points in the highway , distant one hundred , seventy - five and fifty feet from the crossing ; at forty feet from the crossing the view is limited to ...
... crossing . ” It was admitted that a clear view of two thousand feet was obtainable at points in the highway , distant one hundred , seventy - five and fifty feet from the crossing ; at forty feet from the crossing the view is limited to ...
Page 145
... crossing of the defendant railroad company . Irrespective , however , of the proof of primary negligence of the ... crossing , and con- tinued until the crossing was passed , there can be no recovery by the plaintiff . " VOL . LII . 10 ...
... crossing of the defendant railroad company . Irrespective , however , of the proof of primary negligence of the ... crossing , and con- tinued until the crossing was passed , there can be no recovery by the plaintiff . " VOL . LII . 10 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1911-Decided June 44 Vroom 52 Vroom action affirmed alleged amendment amount appears application assessment assigned Atlantic City BERGEN BOGERT bond cause Central Railroad certiorari charge CHIEF JUSTICE claim condition CONGDON construction contract contributory negligence council court was delivered crossing damages declaration defendant in error defendant's demurrer District Court duty election entitled Erie Railroad Co evidence fact feet fendant ground held injury Insurance Jersey City judgment jury land legislative legislature liability March 23 ment MINTURN mortgage Newark nonsuit notice objection opinion ordinance owner Pamph PARKER parties payment Pennsylvania Railroad person plaintiff in error plea present proof prosecutor Public Service Railway question railroad company Railway reason recover refused road statute street Supreme Court SWAYZE testimony thereof tion track TRENCHARD trial court trial judge verdict VOORHEES VREDENBURGH West Jersey writ of error