Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81Soney and Sage, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 100
Page 27
... held on November 8th , 1910 , in the county of Ocean , George C. Low was the regularly nomi- nated Democratic candidate for state senator , and Thomas A. Mathis the regularly nominated Republican candidate for that office . " Within the ...
... held on November 8th , 1910 , in the county of Ocean , George C. Low was the regularly nomi- nated Democratic candidate for state senator , and Thomas A. Mathis the regularly nominated Republican candidate for that office . " Within the ...
Page 51
... held that trust companies were taxable upon the market value , not the par value , of their stock , and that therefore the assessment and imposition upon them was the exact equivalent of that upon national bank stock , and , so , that ...
... held that trust companies were taxable upon the market value , not the par value , of their stock , and that therefore the assessment and imposition upon them was the exact equivalent of that upon national bank stock , and , so , that ...
Page 52
... held by individual stockholders ; but the Supreme Court held that taxation in this mode was at least equal to that upon the shares of the individual stockholders , and that there was , therefore , no illegal discrimination against ...
... held by individual stockholders ; but the Supreme Court held that taxation in this mode was at least equal to that upon the shares of the individual stockholders , and that there was , therefore , no illegal discrimination against ...
Page 54
... held that a construction of the act that made trust companies as- sessable only upon the par value of their stock would render it unconstitutional ; that such a construction was not neces- sary since the act could be read to mean that ...
... held that a construction of the act that made trust companies as- sessable only upon the par value of their stock would render it unconstitutional ; that such a construction was not neces- sary since the act could be read to mean that ...
Page 55
... held that a change of language in that act did not suffice to change the existing law , and the same rule is applicable to the present case which arises under a different section of the same act . The language of section 18 of the Tax ...
... held that a change of language in that act did not suffice to change the existing law , and the same rule is applicable to the present case which arises under a different section of the same act . The language of section 18 of the Tax ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1911-Decided June 44 Vroom 52 Vroom action affirmed alleged amendment amount appears application assessment assigned Atlantic City BERGEN BOGERT bond cause Central Railroad certiorari charge CHIEF JUSTICE claim condition CONGDON construction contract contributory negligence council court was delivered crossing damages declaration defendant in error defendant's demurrer District Court duty election entitled Erie Railroad Co evidence fact feet fendant ground held injury Insurance Jersey City judgment jury land legislative legislature liability March 23 ment MINTURN mortgage Newark nonsuit notice objection opinion ordinance owner Pamph PARKER parties payment Pennsylvania Railroad person plaintiff in error plea present proof prosecutor Public Service Railway question railroad company Railway reason recover refused road statute street Supreme Court SWAYZE testimony thereof tion track TRENCHARD trial court trial judge verdict VOORHEES VREDENBURGH West Jersey writ of error