Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81Soney and Sage, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 100
Page 40
... negligence , if determined by the court as a judge , was not justified by legal rules , and if found by the court as ... negligent whether he looked or failed to look , and of the two we think that his failure to look would , if one or ...
... negligence , if determined by the court as a judge , was not justified by legal rules , and if found by the court as ... negligent whether he looked or failed to look , and of the two we think that his failure to look would , if one or ...
Page 96
... negligence of the defendant in failing to keep a certain highway grade crossing over its tracks in proper repair . The declaration avers that the tracks of the defendant com- pany cross a certain public highway in the county of Warren ...
... negligence of the defendant in failing to keep a certain highway grade crossing over its tracks in proper repair . The declaration avers that the tracks of the defendant com- pany cross a certain public highway in the county of Warren ...
Page 142
... negligence of a railway in failing to blow a highway crossing signal ( Pamph . L. 1903. p . 663 ) consisted solely in the testimony of a witness who said that he did not hear it , coupled with a statement that on account of a strong ...
... negligence of a railway in failing to blow a highway crossing signal ( Pamph . L. 1903. p . 663 ) consisted solely in the testimony of a witness who said that he did not hear it , coupled with a statement that on account of a strong ...
Page 143
... negligence in the failure . to give the statutory signals by bell or whistle was suffi- ciently made out to carry the case to the jury , yet we think the proof clearly exhibits the concurring negligence of the plaintiff but for which ...
... negligence in the failure . to give the statutory signals by bell or whistle was suffi- ciently made out to carry the case to the jury , yet we think the proof clearly exhibits the concurring negligence of the plaintiff but for which ...
Page 145
... negligence of the defendant , or of contributory negligence of the plaint- iff , the judgment must be reversed , for the refusal to charge the defendant's requests . The following requests to charge were refused , such refusal having ...
... negligence of the defendant , or of contributory negligence of the plaint- iff , the judgment must be reversed , for the refusal to charge the defendant's requests . The following requests to charge were refused , such refusal having ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1911-Decided June 44 Vroom 52 Vroom action affirmed alleged amendment amount appears application assessment assigned Atlantic City BERGEN BOGERT bond cause Central Railroad certiorari charge CHIEF JUSTICE claim condition CONGDON construction contract contributory negligence council court was delivered crossing damages declaration defendant in error defendant's demurrer District Court duty election entitled Erie Railroad Co evidence fact feet fendant ground held injury Insurance Jersey City judgment jury land legislative legislature liability March 23 ment MINTURN mortgage Newark nonsuit notice objection opinion ordinance owner Pamph PARKER parties payment Pennsylvania Railroad person plaintiff in error plea present proof prosecutor Public Service Railway question railroad company Railway reason recover refused road statute street Supreme Court SWAYZE testimony thereof tion track TRENCHARD trial court trial judge verdict VOORHEES VREDENBURGH West Jersey writ of error