If the company is deprived of the power of charging reasonable rates for the use of its property, and such deprivation takes place in the absence of an investigation by judicial machinery, it is deprived of the lawful use of its property, and thus, in... United States Supreme Court Reports - Page 100by United States. Supreme Court - 1926Full view - About this book
| 1911 - 460 pages
...Thus, as the Supreme Court said, in the case of Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul BB Co. v. Minnesota: "If the company is deprived of the power of charging...and such deprivation takes place in the absence of investigation by judicial machinery, it is deprived of the lawful use of its property, and thus, in... | |
| Ernst Freund - 1911 - 718 pages
...eminently a question for judicial investigation, requiring due process of law for its determination. If the company is deprived of the power of charging...reasonable rates for the use of its property, and such depriva»o Section 9 (f) of the act of Minnesota (Laws 1887, c. 10) provided: "Said commission may... | |
| Samuel Charles Wiel - 1911 - 1112 pages
...all presumptions in favor of the rate) so low as to deprive the company of a fair return on the value of its property, " and thus, in substance and effect, of the property itself. ' ' 19 Where, however, the rate clearly amounts to confiscation of the distributor's property, the... | |
| United States. District Court (Hawaii) - 1911 - 864 pages
...allegations to the effect that he was being deprived of his liberty under an order of a Texas court but without due process of law and in violation of the Constitution of the United States. After a hearing, the circuit court dismissed the writ. The Supreme Court affirmed the... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1932 - 146 pages
...eminently a question for judicial investigation, requiring due process of law for its determination. If the company is deprived of the power of charging...of law and in violation of the Constitution of the United States. * * * From that judgment Mr. Justice Bradley dissented in this vigorous manner : I can... | |
| |