...US 1, 48, 18 Sup. Ct. 18, 27, 42 L. Ed. 355). It is there said: "The general principle • • • Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies ; aud even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question or fact once...

...court in Southern Pacific B, Co. v. United States, 168 US 1, 48 [18 Sup. Ct. 18, 27 (42 L. Ed. 355)J: 'That a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies.' " Within this definition the presence of an agent of the Bureau of Naturalization, a mere administrative...

...controversy between the parties. The rule is thus stated by the supreme court of the United States : "A right, question, or fact distinctly put In Issue,...cannot be disputed In a subsequent suit between the some parties; and even If the second suit Is for a different cause of action, the right, question,...

...court. If it be treated as being between the same parties or their privies, it is well established that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined in the first suit cannot he disputed in a subsequent suit. Such right, question, or fact is to be taken...

...721, 64 Am. St. Вeр. 830, 41 L. В. A. 703, THE JUDGMENT AS AN ESTOPPEL. §627 question or fact is distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in a former suit between the same parties or their privies, the former adjudication of that fact, right...

...v. United States, 18 S. Ct. 18, 27, 168 U. S. 1. 48 (42 L. Ed. 355), Mr. Justice Harlan said : ' ' The general principle announced in numerous cases...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties and their privies ; and, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question,...

...another action then pending between the same parties, respecting other lands within the same grant. 2. A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, even if that suit is for a different cause of action. 3. The word "designated" in the act of Congresi...

...Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States (168 US 1, 48). "That a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...of competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery can not be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies." And then said:...

...in favor of Wegener. Wegener has prayed an appeal. [1, 2] It is settled by a long line of decisions that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...determined by a court of competent Jurisdiction as ground oí recovery of defense cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or...

...to go to a court of law and relitigate the question. As stated by the United States Supreme Court: "The general principle announced in numerous cases...right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue and rightly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed...