 The fact that the defendant intended to restore the property stolen or embezzled, is no ground of defense, or of mitigation of punishment, if it has not been restored before complaint to a magistrate, charging the commission of the crime.  Spurious Interpretation - Page 394by Roscoe Pound - 1907 - 386 pagesFull view - About this book
 | New York (State) - 1904 - 1090 pages
...restore property. 549 Pen. £. The fact that the defendant intended to restore the property MoiA"pro«" stolen or embezzled is no ground of defense, or of...magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. § 550 Criminally receiving property. 5^, Pen c A person, who buys or receives any stolen property,... | |
 | New York (State), William Henry Silvernail - 1905 - 1252 pages
...Grim, 3 NY Cr., 317. Sue People e. Ouley, 7 St. Rep., 798. § .119. Intent to restore property. — The fact that the defendant intended to restore the property stolen or embezzled, is DO ground of defense, or of mitigation of punishment, if it has not been restored before complaint... | |
 | New York (State), William Henry Silvernail - 1906 - 1260 pages
...Grim, 3 NY Cr., 317. S. e People v. Ouley, 7 bt. Hep. , 798. , § 549. Intent to restore property.— The fact that the defendant intended to restore the...punishment, if it has not been restored before complaint tb a magistrate, charging the coinmission of the crime. See Chatterton v. People, 15 Abb., 147. §... | |
 | New York (State). Board of Statutory Consolidation - 1907 - 498 pages
...pay demands held against him. [Penal Code § 548.] § 2277. Intent to restore property no defense. The fact that the defendant intended to restore the...magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. [Penal Code § 549.] [chapter] article, knowing the same to have been stolen or so dealt with, or who... | |
 | New York (State) - 1908 - 886 pages
...coniinit. People v. Jarte, 185 NY 41)7, r.'v'g 112 App. Div. 516. { В Г.1. Intent to reHtore property. The fact that the defendant Intended to restore the...of defense, or of mitigation of punishment, if it li;is not been restored before complaint to a magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. Chatterton... | |
 | New York (State) - 1911 - 1204 pages
...State, 25 Tex. App. 333; Meade v. State, 25 Nebr. 444. § 13O7. Intent to restore property no defense. The fact that the defendant intended to restore the...magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. Derivation: Penal Code, § 549. Parr v. Loder (1904), 97 App. Div. 218, 89 NY Supp. 823. § 1308. Buying... | |
 | Clarence Alexander - 1914 - 312 pages
...county into or through which the stolen property is brought. q. Intent to restore property no defense. The fact that the defendant intended to restore the...magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. r. Value of stolen passage ticket; how ascertained. If the thing stolen is a ticket, paper or other... | |
 | 1916 - 1380 pages
...Laws 1909, § 2618), it is provided that "the fact that the accused intended to restore the property embezzled is no ground of defense, or of mitigation...of punishment, if it has not been restored before an information has been laid before a magistrate, charging the commission of the offense." State v.... | |
 | Oklahoma - 1921 - 672 pages
...561, 160 P. 34. 1184. Intent to Restore — The fact that the accused intended to restore the property embezzled is no ground of defense, or of mitigation...of punishment, if it has not been restored before an information has been laid before a magistrate charging the commission of the offense. (2679, RL... | |
| |
