...averment that by his representations or his conduct, the one party has intentionally induced the other to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and to act on that belief. No such averments were made in this case. — M'KEUCHAB v. ANDERSON; 18th October...

...Sears. " The rule of " law is clear that where one, by his words " or conduct, wilfully causes another to " believe in the existence of a certain state " of things, and induces him to act on that " belief, so as to alter his own previous " position, the former is concluded...